Overcoming barriers to sustainability by combining conceptual, visual, and networking systems

Sustainability challenges rarely align with the conventional boundaries of our disciplines, institutions and means of communication. To address these challenges amid real-world complexity, we need to think holistically and collaborate across disciplines. In this paper, we synthesise three themes: (1) more integrated conceptual frameworks; (2) digital visual communication which provides fluid expression of complex ideas and perceptions; and (3) online networks which can empower sustainability initiatives and communicate them across social and institutional barriers at a global scale. Each of these tools can help to overcome persistent barriers to sustainability. When used together, they provide a strategic basis for the design of digital collaboration platforms for addressing sustainability challenges. Using design thinking, we developed a Synergy Map which identifies relationships among a number of barriers to sustainability and conceptual and digital tools which help to address them. The Map identifies the potential for synthesising these tools into effective digital artefacts. We provide several examples and identify characteristics of particular value for overcoming barriers to sustainability. Combining new theoretical developments in sustainability sciences with recent advances in communication and networking technologies offers substantial potential for advancing sustainability on multiple fronts.

[1]  Thaddeus R. Miller,et al.  Constructing sustainability science: emerging perspectives and research trajectories , 2012, Sustainability Science.

[2]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology , 2020, Systems Approaches to Making Change: A Practical Guide.

[3]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  The Three Cycle View of Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Maik Adomßent,et al.  Sustainability Communication: An Integrative Approach , 2011 .

[5]  Tony Becher,et al.  Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines , 2001 .

[6]  D. Meyer,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S6 References Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups , 2022 .

[7]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[8]  H. Siebert.  Sustainability Communication: A Systemic-Constructivist Perspective , 2011 .

[9]  Erfan Abdi Dezfouli,et al.  A sense of change: media designers and artists communicating about complexity in social-ecological systems , 2014 .

[10]  Mitchell Pavao-Zuckerman,et al.  Conceptual Models as Tools for Communication Across Disciplines , 2003 .

[11]  Gloria Gomez,et al.  CmapTools: A Knowledge Modeling and Sharing Environment , 2004 .

[12]  K. Cronin,et al.  TRANSDICIPLINARY RESEARCH (TDR) AND SUSTAINABILITY , 2008 .

[13]  Jon Kolko,et al.  Abductive Thinking and Sensemaking: The Drivers of Design Synthesis , 2010, Design Issues.

[14]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[15]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation , 2006, DIS '06.

[16]  F. Berkes,et al.  Community Resilience: Toward an Integrated Approach , 2013 .

[17]  C. Folke.  RESILIENCE: THE EMERGENCE OF A PERSPECTIVE FOR SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS ANALYSES , 2006 .

[18]  Gene Bazan.  Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth , 1997 .

[19]  J. Nassauer,et al.  Design in science: extending the landscape ecology paradigm , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[20]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Transformational change: creating a safe operating space for humanity , 2015 .

[21]  Ray Maher.  MetaMAP - a visual collaboration platform for sustainability , 2017 .

[22]  H. Heinrichs.  Participation: Empowerment for Sustainable Development , 2011 .

[23]  Jeffrey V. Nickerson,et al.  Collective Creativity: Where we are and where we might go , 2012, ArXiv.

[24]  Arthur S. Lieberman,et al.  Landscape Ecology , 1994, Springer New York.

[25]  Udo Kruschwitz,et al.  Motivations for Participation in Socially Networked Collective Intelligence Systems , 2012, ArXiv.

[26]  Jessica E. Leahy,et al.  Communication and sustainability science teams as complex systems , 2015 .

[27]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  SEEING INTO SKETCHES: REGROUPING PARTS ENCOURAGES NEW INTERPRETATIONS , 2001 .

[28]  Ines Mergel.  The Use of Social Media to Dissolve Knowledge Silos in Government , 2010 .

[29]  Eli Blevis,et al.  Sustainable interaction design: invention & disposal, renewal & reuse , 2007, CHI.

[30]  Jens Newig,et al.  Climate Change as an Element of Sustainability Communication , 2011 .

[31]  Jennifer Wells.  Complexity and Sustainability , 2012 .

[32]  Robert Costanza,et al.  Overcoming systemic roadblocks to sustainability: The evolutionary redesign of worldviews, institutions, and technologies , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Nigel Cross.  The Routledge Companion to Design Research , 2017 .

[34]  Arran Stibbe,et al.  The Handbook of Sustainability Literacy: skills for a changing world , 2009 .

[35]  D. Lang,et al.  Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability , 2014 .

[36]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI , 2007, CHI.

[37]  Douglas Glandon,et al.  Measuring resilience is not enough; we must apply the research. Researchers and practitioners need a common language to make this happen. , 2015 .

[38]  Erik Hollnagel.  Designing for Complexity , 1997, HCI.

[39]  M. Reynolds,et al.  Critical systems heuristics , 2010 .

[40]  J. Harris,et al.  Tackling Wicked Problems: Through the Transdisciplinary Imagination , 2010 .

[41]  Trygve Faste,et al.  DEMYSTIFYING “ DESIGN RESEARCH ” : DESIGN IS NOT RESEARCH , RESEARCH IS DESIGN , 2012 .

[42]  Pim Martens,et al.  Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges , 2012, Sustainability Science.

[43]  C. Pohl,et al.  Handbook of transdisciplinary research , 2008 .

[44]  Wilmot Li,et al.  Design principles for visual communication , 2011, Commun. ACM.

[45]  Tony Becher.  Academic Tribes And Territories , 1989 .

[46]  Jon Biemer,et al.  Our environmental handprint: The good we do , 2013, 2013 1st IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability (SusTech).

[47]  Jasmin Godemann,et al.  Sustainability Communication – An Introduction , 2011 .

[48]  Kerrie A. Wilson,et al.  Achieving social-ecological fit through bottom-up collaborative governance: an empirical investigation , 2015 .

[49]  S. Moser.  Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions , 2010 .

[50]  Jasmin Godemann,et al.  Sustainability communication : interdisciplinary perspectives and theoretical foundations , 2011 .

[51]  Shannon Kennedy-Clark,et al.  Research by Design: Design-Based Research and the Higher Degree Research student , 2013 .

[52]  J. L. van Genderen.  Only one Earth: the long road via Rio to sustainable development , 2014, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[53]  G. Broman,et al.  A framework for strategic sustainable development , 2017 .

[54]  Greg Walkerden,et al.  Adaptiveness and openness in ecosystem management : an exemplary sensitivity , 2010 .

[55]  John Zimmerman,et al.  An analysis and critique of Research through Design: towards a formalization of a research approach , 2010, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[56]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[57]  Dirk Helbing.  Introduction: The FuturICT knowledge accelerator towards a more resilient and sustainable future , 2013, ArXiv.

[58]  E. Henry,et al.  Kaupapa Maori: Locating Indigenous Ontology, Epistemology and Methodology in the Academy , 2001 .

[59]  Daniel Collins.  Participatory Geographic Information Systems (PGIS) in Visual Research , 2011 .

[60]  P. Lester.  Syntactic Theory of Visual Communication , 2013 .

[61]  F. Chapin,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity , 2009 .

[62]  L. Kruse.  Psychological Aspects of Sustainability Communication , 2011 .

[63]  Jules Moloney.  Planing a thesis: ways, means and tactics for research through design , 2015 .

[64]  D. Lang,et al.  A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science , 2013 .

[65]  R. Glanville.  Designing Complexity , 2007 .

[66]  Janne Hukkinen.  Sustainability Networks: Cognitive Tools for Expert Collaboration in Social-Ecological Systems , 2008 .

[67]  Kevin F. Kelly.  New rules for the new economy : 10 radical strategies for a connected world , 1998 .

[68]  C. Warren.  Positive Development: From Vicious Circles to Virtuous Cycles through Built Environment Design , 2011 .

[69]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology , 2012 .