How companies engage customers around accessibility on social media

Social media offers a targeted way for mainstream technology companies to communicate with people with disabilities about the accessibility problems that they face. While companies have started to engage with users on social media about accessibility, they differ greatly in terms of their approach and how well they support the ways in which their users want to engage. In this paper, we describe current use patterns of six corporate accessibility teams and their users on Twitter, and present an analysis of these interactions. We find that while many users want to interact directly with companies about accessibility, companies prefer to redirect them to other channels and use Twitter for broadcast messages promoting their accessibility work instead. Our analysis demonstrates that users want to use social media to become part of the process of improving accessibility of mainstream technology, and suggests the extent to which a company is able to leverage this input depends greatly on how they choose to present themselves and interact on social media.

[1]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  What do people ask their social networks, and why?: a survey study of status message q&a behavior , 2010, CHI.

[2]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  Investigating the appropriateness of social network question asking as a resource for blind users , 2013, CSCW.

[3]  Eileen Fischer,et al.  Social interaction via new social media: (How) can interactions on Twitter affect effectual thinking and behavior? , 2011 .

[4]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  Trent Seltzer,et al.  Dialogic communication in 140 characters or less: How Fortune 500 companies engage stakeholders usin , 2010 .

[6]  Shelley Wigley,et al.  Rules of engagement: Practice what you tweet , 2012 .

[7]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Twitter adoption and use in mass convergence and emergency events , 2009 .

[8]  Jonathan Frank,et al.  Web Accessibility for the Blind: Corporate Social Responsibility  or Litigation Avoidance? , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[9]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Visually impaired users on an online social network , 2014, CHI.

[10]  Gregory D. Saxton,et al.  Engaging Stakeholders Through Twitter: How Nonprofit Organizations Are Getting More Out of 140 Characters or Less , 2010, ArXiv.

[11]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Beyond Microblogging: Conversation and Collaboration via Twitter , 2009 .

[12]  Scott McCoy,et al.  The state of corporate website accessibility , 2009, CACM.

[13]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Beyond Microblogging: Conversation and Collaboration via Twitter , 2009, 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[14]  Michael L. Kent,et al.  Building Dialogic Relationships through the World Wide Web. , 1998 .

[15]  Jonathan Lazar,et al.  Improving web accessibility: a study of webmaster perceptions , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[16]  Huan Liu,et al.  Is the Sample Good Enough? Comparing Data from Twitter's Streaming API with Twitter's Firehose , 2013, ICWSM.