Shaking table tests on a full-scale unreinforced and IMG-retrofitted clay brick masonry barrel vault

The recent earthquakes in Italy demonstrated the extreme vulnerability of historical and cultural structures. Masonry vaults, which represent artistically valuable elements of these constructions, have been recognised among the most vulnerable elements. Traditional vault retrofit methods, such as buttresses or ties, are still widely adopted. These retrofit methods prevent differential displacements between vault supports (e.g., abutments, masonry piers and loadbearing walls). However, the pier differential displacement is not the only vulnerability source for vaults, and in many cases, further retrofit interventions are needed. Innovative retrofit methods based on inorganic matrixes, such as IMG, are aimed to prevent hinge mechanism failures. Such methods are suitable to be applied on vaults already retrofitted using traditional methods. The knowledge of the seismic behaviour of a vault, once the differential displacement between the supports is prevented, can be crucial to the assessment of potential further vulnerabilities of vaults already retrofitted with traditional methods. However, a deep knowledge of vault seismic behaviour is still lacking from an experimental point of view. Indeed, to date, few dynamic experimental studies have been conducted. Therefore, to investigate the seismic behaviour of masonry barrel vaults, several shaking table tests were performed on a full-scale specimen before and after the retrofit interventions. The tests investigated the main seismic properties of the tested structure and clarified the cracking mechanisms and capacity improvement due to the retrofit interventions. A comprehensive overview of the main results of the experimental tests has been presented.

[1]  C Melbourne,et al.  THE BEHAVIOUR OF MULTIRING BRICKWORK ARCH BRIDGES , 1995 .

[2]  D. Rinaldis,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE OF UNCERTAINTY IN SEISMIC RESPONSE OF MASONRY VAULTS , 2008 .

[3]  Francesco Genna,et al.  Stability and strength of old masonry vaults under compressive longitudinal loads: Engineering analyses of a case study , 2012 .

[4]  Jacques Heyman,et al.  The Stone Skeleton: Structural Engineering of Masonry Architecture , 1997 .

[5]  Yong Sheng,et al.  Evaluation of different computational modelling strategies for the analysis of low strength masonry structures , 2014 .

[6]  Matthew J. DeJong,et al.  Failure of masonry arches under impulse base motion , 2007 .

[7]  Arkadiusz Kwiecień,et al.  Round Robin Test for composite-to-brick shear bond characterization , 2012 .

[8]  A. Prota,et al.  Nonlinear Analyses of Tuff Masonry Walls Strengthened with Cementitious Matrix-Grid Composites , 2009 .

[9]  Jacques Heyman,et al.  The stone skeleton , 1995 .

[10]  Marco Di Ludovico,et al.  Composites for Structural Strengthening , 2012 .

[11]  Hamid R. Ronagh,et al.  Lateral performance and load carrying capacity of an unreinforced, CFRP-retrofitted historical masonry vault - A case study , 2012 .

[12]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  Simple Method for the Design of Jet Grouted Umbrellas in Tunneling , 2008 .

[13]  Matthew Gilbert,et al.  Influence of backfill on the capacity of masonry arch bridges , 2012 .

[14]  John B. Mander,et al.  Seismic Resistance of Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures Designed for Gravity Loads: Performance of Structural System , 1995 .

[15]  David García,et al.  Rehabilitation of masonry arches with compatible advanced composite material , 2011 .

[16]  Philippe Block,et al.  Real-time limit analysis of vaulted masonry buildings , 2006 .

[17]  Andrea Prota,et al.  Nonlinear Analyses of Adobe Masonry Walls Reinforced with Fiberglass Mesh , 2014 .

[18]  Paolo Clemente,et al.  LIMIT BEHAVIOR OF STONE ARCH BRIDGES , 1995 .

[19]  C A Coulomb,et al.  ESSAI SUR UNE APPLICATION DES REGLES DE MAXIMIS ET MINIMIS A QUELQUES PROBLEMES DE STATIQUE RELATIFS A L'ARCHITECTURE (ESSAY ON MAXIMUMS AND MINIMUMS OF RULES TO SOME STATIC PROBLEMS RELATING TO ARCHITECTURE) , 1973 .

[20]  Jacques Heyman,et al.  The Stone Skeleton by Jacques Heyman , 1995 .

[21]  Andrea Prota,et al.  Nonlinear Behavior of a Masonry Subassemblage Before and After Strengthening with Inorganic Matrix-Grid Composites , 2011 .

[22]  Jorge Alfaiate,et al.  The effect of the infill in arched structures: Analytical and numerical modelling , 2011 .

[23]  Andrea Prota,et al.  Externally Bonded Masonry Structures , 2012 .

[24]  Mihai Budescu,et al.  Improving structural response of masonry vaults strengthened with polymeric textile composite strips , 2010 .

[25]  P. Lourenço Computational strategies for masonry structures : Proefschrift , 1996 .

[26]  A. Prota,et al.  Numerical Investigation on the Influence of FRP Retrofit Layout and Geometry on the In-Plane Behavior of Masonry Walls , 2012 .

[27]  Gabriele Milani,et al.  Lesson learned after the Emilia-Romagna, Italy, 20–29 May 2012 earthquakes: A limit analysis insight on three masonry churches , 2013 .

[28]  Jacques Heyman,et al.  The safety of masonry arches , 1969 .

[29]  Nicola Augenti,et al.  Earthquake damages to cultural heritage constructions and simplified assessment of artworks , 2013 .

[30]  Vincenzo Giamundo Seismic assessment and retrofit of historical masonry barrel vaults , 2014 .

[31]  Andrei M. Reinhorn,et al.  Simulation of floor response spectra in shake table experiments , 2011 .

[32]  T Mahdi PERFORMANCE OF TRADITIONAL ARCHES, VAULTS AND DOMES IN THE 2003 BAM EARTHQUAKE , 2004 .

[33]  G. Housner The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes , 1963 .

[34]  Thomas E. Boothby Analysis of masonry arches and vaults , 2001 .

[35]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  The Finite Element Method: Its Basis and Fundamentals , 2005 .

[36]  Andrea Prota,et al.  Experimental investigation of the seismic performances of IMG reinforcement on curved masonry elements , 2015 .