A prospective randomised controlled trial of external cephalic version comparing two methods of uterine tocolysis with a non-tocolysis group.

The use of tocolvtic agents to enhance uterine relaxation and facilitate external cephalic version (ECV) has come under recent debate. We studied 90 breech presentations in late pregnancy who did not have contra-indications to ECV. The patients were randomised into 3 groups of 30 patients each: one was administered oral salbutamol 4 mg t.d.s.; another had intravenous salbutamol infused until the maternal heart rate rose above 100 bpm for 30 mins; and the last served as a control group. All patients in each group were matched for parity and gestation, and each had an intravenous line, thereby masking the treatment group from the 2 doctors who performed half the number of ECVs each. There was no significant difference in the success of ECV between the treatment and control groups (46.6% vs 50.0% vs 46.6%). The gestational age, the placental site, the attitude of the breech, the abdominal girth, and the maternal weight and fetal birth weights did not seem to influence results. On the other hand, there was a significant difference in successful ECV between nullipara (26%) and multipara (75%) (p less than 0.001). There were no cases of abruptio placenta or foetal distress, and one patient entered labour one day after the ECV at 39 weeks gestation. There were 2 cases of spontaneous version after failed ECV, and one case of spontaneous reversion to breech after successful ECV. We conclude that the use of salbutamol does not increase the incidence of successful ECV, but multiparity predicts for a successful outcome.

[1]  B. Schifrin,et al.  Update on External Cephalic Version Performed at Term , 1985, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  T. Chimbira,et al.  Controlled trial of external cephalic version , 1985, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[3]  J. P. Vandorsten,et al.  External cephalic version with tocolysis. Observations and continuing experience at the Los Angeles County/University of Southern California Medical Center. , 1984, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[4]  B. Schifrin,et al.  Randomized control trial of external cephalic version with tocolysis in late pregnancy. , 1981, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  B. Nilsson,et al.  External Cephalic Version in Breech Presentation Under Tocolysis , 1979, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  D. Berg,et al.  Critical remarks on external cephalic version under tocolysis Report on a case of antepartum fetal death , 1977, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[7]  J. Bock The Influence of Prophylactic External Cephalic Version on the Incidence of Breech Delivery , 1969, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[8]  D. Hay Observations on breech presentation and delivery. , 1960, The Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of the British Empire.

[9]  D. Hay OBSERVATIONS ON BREECH PRESENTATION AND DELIVERY , 1959 .

[10]  A. J. White Spontaneous cephalic version in the later weeks of pregnancy and its significance in the management of breech presentation. , 1956, The Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of the British Empire.