Are floristic and edaphic patterns in Amazonian rain forests congruent for trees, pteridophytes and Melastomataceae?

Studies in western Amazonian forests have found that similarities in soil cation concentration and texture explain floristic similarities between sites, when these are measured using trees, pteridophytes or Melastomataceae. However, it is not known to what extent the three plant groups react to the same soil characteristics, because tree studies have almost always been conducted in different areas than studies on the understorey plant groups. We made inventories in 23 sites representing non-inundated rain forests on clayey to loamy soil in three regions of western Amazonia. Significant Mantel correlations between the floristic patterns of trees and pteridophytes were found in all three regions when floristic differences were measured with species presence–absence data. When species abundance data were used, and when the floristic patterns of trees and Melastomataceae were compared, significant correlations were found in one or two regions. Mantel correlations between plant groups were highest in the two regions where the observed variation in soil characteristics was largest. In all regions, the same soil variables emerged with significant Mantel correlations with trees, pteridophytes and Melastomataceae. Soil calcium and magnesium were most frequently retained in the models of multiple regression on distance matrices. On average, soil differences explained 50% of the variation in floristic differences (range = 14–84%), and geographical distances explained 16% (range = 0–64%). Our results demonstrate that beta diversities of the three plant groups are highly correlated, and that much of this congruence is explained by similar reactions to soil variation. These results support the idea that pteridophytes, and to a lesser degree Melastomataceae, can be used as indicators of general floristic and edaphic patterns in Amazonian rain forests. Since understorey plants are much quicker to inventory than trees, this would make it possible to recognize and map floristic patterns over huge areas of lowland Amazonia within a reasonable time.

[1]  Stephen P. Hubbell,et al.  Beta-Diversity in Tropical Forest Trees , 2002, Science.

[2]  Kati J. Salovaara,et al.  Classification of Amazonian primary rain forest vegetation using Landsat ETM+ satellite imagery , 2005 .

[3]  O. Phillips,et al.  A comparison of fine-scale distribution patterns of four plant groups in an Amazonian rainforest. , 2000 .

[4]  Jens-Christian Svenning,et al.  ECOLOGICAL DETERMINISM IN PLANT COMMUNITY STRUCTURE ACROSS A TROPICAL FOREST LANDSCAPE , 2004 .

[5]  Oliver L. Phillips,et al.  Habitat association among Amazonian tree species: a landscape‐scale approach , 2003 .

[6]  Kalle Ruokolainen,et al.  LINKING FLORISTIC PATTERNS WITH SOIL HETEROGENEITY AND SATELLITE IMAGERY IN ECUADORIAN AMAZONIA , 2003 .

[7]  J. Terborgh,et al.  1 Maintenance of Tree Diversity in Tropical Forests , 2002 .

[8]  H. Wolda,et al.  Similarity indices, sample size and diversity , 1981, Oecologia.

[9]  H. Tuomisto,et al.  Use of Melastomataceae and pteridophytes for revealing phytogeographical patterns in Amazonian rain forests , 1997, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[10]  H. Ellenberg,et al.  Vegetation Ecology of Central Europe. , 1989 .

[11]  A. Gentry Tree species richness of upper Amazonian forests. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  K. Ruokolainen,et al.  The most widespread Amazonian palms tend to be tall and habitat generalists , 2000 .

[13]  Wesley Rodrigues Silva,et al.  Seed dispersal and frugivory : ecology, evolution, and conservation , 2002 .

[14]  D. C. Malcolm,et al.  The use of ground vegetation and humus type as indicators of soil nutrient regime for an ecological site classification of British forests , 2001 .

[15]  O. Phillips,et al.  Efficient plot-based floristic assessment of tropical forests , 2003, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[16]  Kalle Ruokolainen,et al.  Floristic patterns along a 43‐km long transect in an Amazonian rain forest , 2003 .

[17]  J. Lyon,et al.  Gradient analysis in a riparian landscape: contrasts among forest layers , 1997 .

[18]  J. Plotkin,et al.  HABITAT PATTERNS IN TROPICAL RAIN FORESTS: A COMPARISON OF 105 PLOTS IN NORTHWEST BORNEO , 2002 .

[19]  Hanna Tuomisto,et al.  Dissecting Amazonian Biodiversity , 1995, Science.

[20]  Prediction of forest soil nutrient status using vegetation , 2003 .

[21]  J. F. Duivenvoorden,et al.  Evaluación de recursos vegetales no maderables en la Amazonía noroccidental , 2001 .

[22]  A. Cajander,et al.  Theory of forest types , 1926 .

[23]  Kalle Ruokolainen,et al.  Rapid Tropical Forest Inventory: a Comparison of Techniques Based on Inventory Data from Western Amazonia , 2004 .

[24]  Mark Vellend,et al.  Do commonly used indices of β‐diversity measure species turnover? , 2001 .

[25]  Á. Duque,et al.  Different floristic patterns of woody understorey and canopy plants in Colombian Amazonia , 2002, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[26]  H. Tuomisto,et al.  Two biases in estimating range sizes of Amazonian plant species , 2002, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[27]  L. P. van Reeuwijk,et al.  Procedures for soil analysis , 1995 .

[28]  Alan York,et al.  Spatial Fidelity of Plant, Vertebrate, and Invertebrate Assemblages in Multiple‐Use Forest in Eastern Australia , 1998 .

[29]  P. Walker,et al.  How do indicator groups provide information about the relative biodiversity of different sets of areas?: on hotspots, complementarity and pattern-based approaches , 1996 .

[30]  S. Ferrier Mapping spatial pattern in biodiversity for regional conservation planning: where to from here? , 2002, Systematic biology.

[31]  Kalle Ruokolainen,et al.  Mapping gradual landscape-scale floristic changes in Amazonian primary rain forests by combining ordination and remote sensing , 2005 .

[32]  G. N. Lance,et al.  Studies in the Numerical Analysis of Complex Rain-Forest Communities: II. The Problem of Species-Sampling , 1967 .

[33]  J. Terborgh,et al.  DOMINANCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF TREE SPECIES IN UPPER AMAZONIAN TERRA FIRME FORESTS , 2001 .

[34]  J. Svenning,et al.  Oligarchic dominance in western Amazonian plant communities , 2005, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[35]  Jens-Christian Svenning,et al.  Diversity and dominance in palm (Arecaceae) communities in terra firme forests in the western Amazon basin , 2004 .

[36]  Kalle Ruokolainen,et al.  Beta-diversity in tropical forests. , 2002, Science.

[37]  Kalle Ruokolainen,et al.  Dispersal, Environment, and Floristic Variation of Western Amazonian Forests , 2003, Science.

[38]  K. Young,et al.  Pteridophyte species diversity in the central Peruvian Amazon: Importance of edaphic specialization , 1989, Brittonia.

[39]  P. Legendre,et al.  MODELING BRAIN EVOLUTION FROM BEHAVIOR: A PERMUTATIONAL REGRESSION APPROACH , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[40]  H. Tuomisto,et al.  Influence of edaphic specialization on pteridophyte distribution in neotropical rain forests , 1996 .

[41]  T. Allen,et al.  Will similar forests develop on similar sites , 1985 .