Outcomes in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes randomized to enoxaparin vs. unfractionated heparin: results from the SYNERGY trial.

AIMS Elderly patients are at high risk from non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS) as well as from treatment-related complications. Age-associated changes in physiology may alter the risk and benefit expected from therapy. The SYNERGY database was used to study the influence of age on treatment outcomes with enoxaparin vs. unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients with high-risk NSTE ACS. METHODS AND RESULTS Age was analysed as a continuous and categorical variable (<65, 65-74, and >or=75 years, and <75 and >or=75 years) for descriptive purposes. Logistic regression was used to adjust the outcomes of 30-day death, death or myocardial infarction (MI), and major bleeding for baseline characteristics. Odds ratios compared outcomes by age and by treatment within age groups. Model interaction terms were used to test for statistically different outcomes by treatment and age. Overall, 9977 randomized patients had age information, of whom 25.5% (2540) were >or=75 years of age. Elderly patients (>or=75 years) had more cardiovascular risk factors, prior cardiac disease, and higher acuity at presentation. After adjustment, advanced age (per 10 years) was associated with 30-day death or MI [risk odds ratios (ROR): 1.14, P = 0.002], 30-day death (ROR: 1.54, P < 0.0001), and 1-year death (ROR: 1.47, P < 0.0001), as well with TIMI major bleeding (ROR: 1.21, P = 0.001), GUSTO severe bleeding (ROR: 1.20, P = 0.047), and transfusion (ROR: 1.04, P = 0.324). Although there was a higher rate of GUSTO severe bleeding noted with enoxaparin in elderly patients, the overall relationships between treatment (UFH or enoxaparin) and outcomes did not vary significantly as a function of the patient's age. CONCLUSION Although higher rates of adverse events are seen in the oldest subgroup (age >or=75 years) treated with enoxaparin, statistical comparisons confirm similar efficacy and safety of enoxaparin and UFH across age subgroups as was demonstrated overall in SYNERGY.

[1]  William Wijns,et al.  [Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes]. , 2007, Revista portuguesa de cardiologia : orgao oficial da Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia = Portuguese journal of cardiology : an official journal of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology.

[2]  Angelo Branzi,et al.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2007, European heart journal.

[3]  Elijah Edwards,et al.  Enoxaparin Dosing and Associated Risk of In-Hospital Bleeding and Death in Patients With Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes , 2008 .

[4]  Á. Avezum,et al.  Interactions between heparins, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists, and coronary intervention. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). , 2007, American heart journal.

[5]  M. Naylor,et al.  Acute coronary care in the elderly, part I: Non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology. , 2007, Circulation.

[6]  E. Antman,et al.  Enoxaparin vs. unfractionated heparin with fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction in elderly and younger patients: results from ExTRACT-TIMI 25. , 2007, European heart journal.

[7]  K. Eagle,et al.  Use of heparins in Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. , 2007, The American journal of medicine.

[8]  R. Califf,et al.  Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the Superior Yield of the New Strategy of Enoxaparin, Revascularization and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibi , 2006, American heart journal.

[9]  A. Gitt,et al.  Clinical benefit of enoxaparin in patients with high-risk acute coronary syndromes without ST elevations in clinical practice. , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  W. Gibler,et al.  Low-molecular-weight heparin compared with unfractionated heparin for patients with non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes treated with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors: Results from the CRUSADE initiative , 2006, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.

[11]  E. Antman,et al.  Predictors of one-year mortality in high-risk patients with acute coronary syndromes: the SYNERGY trial one-year results , 2006 .

[12]  K. Alexander,et al.  Excess dosing of antiplatelet and antithrombin agents in the treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. , 2005, JAMA.

[13]  K. Alexander,et al.  Evolution in cardiovascular care for elderly patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: results from the CRUSADE National Quality Improvement Initiative. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  Á. Avezum,et al.  Impact of age on management and outcome of acute coronary syndrome: observations from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). , 2005, American heart journal.

[15]  V. Hasselblad,et al.  Efficacy and bleeding complications among patients randomized to enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin for antithrombin therapy in non-ST-Segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a systematic overview. , 2004, JAMA.

[16]  M. Pfeffer,et al.  Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in patients treated with tirofiban, aspirin and an early conservative initial management strategy: results from the A phase of the A-to-Z trial. , 2004, European heart journal.

[17]  H. White,et al.  Safety and efficacy of enoxaparin vs. unfractionated heparin in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. who receive tirofiban and aspirin ☆ , 2004 .

[18]  R. Califf,et al.  Enoxaparin vs unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes managed with an intended early invasive strategy: primary results of the SYNERGY randomized trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[19]  V. Hasselblad,et al.  Safety and efficacy of enoxaparin vs unfractionated heparin in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes who receive tirofiban and aspirin: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[20]  Carl J Pepine,et al.  ACC/AHA guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--2002: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients , 2002, Circulation.

[21]  GlYcoprotein IIb,et al.  The SYNERGY trial: study design and rationale. , 2002, American heart journal.

[22]  E. Braunwald,et al.  First report of an intravenous and oral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (RPR 109891) in patients with recent acute coronary syndromes: results of the TIMI 15A and 15B trials. , 2000, American heart journal.

[23]  E W Steyerberg,et al.  Predictors of outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation. Results from an international trial of 9461 patients. The PURSUIT Investigators. , 2000, Circulation.

[24]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin in acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation: a meta-analysis , 2000, The Lancet.

[25]  E. Antman,et al.  Enoxaparin prevents death and cardiac ischemic events in unstable angina/non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Results of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 11B trial. , 1999, Circulation.

[26]  M. Keltai,et al.  Comparison of two treatment durations (6 days and 14 days) of a low molecular weight heparin with a 6-day treatment of unfractionated heparin in the initial management of unstable angina or non-Q wave myocardial infarction: FRAX.I.S. (FRAxiparine in Ischaemic Syndrome). , 1999, European heart journal.

[27]  C. Camargo,et al.  Elderly patients receive less aggressive medical and invasive management of unstable angina: potential impact of practice guidelines. , 1998, Archives of internal medicine.

[28]  R. Califf,et al.  A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin with unfractionated heparin for unstable coronary artery disease. Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-Wave Coronary Events Study Group. , 1997 .

[29]  W. Klein,et al.  Comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin with unfractionated heparin acutely and with placebo for 6 weeks in the management of unstable coronary artery disease. Fragmin in unstable coronary artery disease study (FRIC) , 1997, Circulation.