Diagnosis of endometriotic lesions by sonovaginography with ultrasound gel.

AIMS The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic ability of sonovaginography (SVG) with ultrasound gel in patients with endometriosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a multicentre prospective study, which included 193 patients with symptoms highly suggestive for endometriosis. All patients were investigated by transvaginal sonography and SVG with gel and afterwards underwent laparoscopic surgery. For each category of endometriotic lesions investigated, we calculated and compared the sensitivity, specificity,  positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the imagisticinvestigations used. RESULTS In the case of endometriotic lesions of the uterosacral ligaments, SVG with gel had a sensitivity of 78.5% and a specificity of 96% (p=ns). The lesions of the vagina and rectovaginal septum were diagnosed with a sensitivity of 79%, respectively 94% (p=ns), obtaining a specificity of 99%, respectively of 97% (p=0.007). The lesions of the Douglas pouch were identified with a sensitivity of 81% (p=0.015), and those of the rectosigmoid with a 94% sensitivity (p=0.010). We obtained lower sensitivity (67%) in detecting the lesions of the urinary bladder (p=ns). CONCLUSIONS SGV with ultrasound gel represents a useful investigation tool for the evaluation of endometriotic lesions in the posterior pelvic compartment.

[1]  F. Amor,et al.  Extended Transvaginal Sonography in Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis , 2014, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[2]  G. Condous,et al.  Prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration in women with suspected endometriosis using a new real‐time dynamic transvaginal ultrasound technique: the sliding sign , 2013, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[3]  S. Banerjee,et al.  Transvaginal sonography vs. clinical examination in the preoperative diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis , 2011, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[4]  C. Singer,et al.  Combination of transvaginal sonography and clinical examination for preoperative diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis. , 2009, Human reproduction.

[5]  L. Savelli,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy and potential limitations of transvaginal sonography for bladder endometriosis , 2007, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[6]  M. Bazot,et al.  Accuracy of transvaginal sonography and rectal endoscopic sonography in the diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis , 2007, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[7]  S. Cheewadhanaraks,et al.  Positive predictive value of clinical diagnosis of endometriosis. , 2004, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[8]  E. Cosmi,et al.  Sonovaginography is a new technique for assessing rectovaginal endometriosis. , 2003, Fertility and sterility.

[9]  B. Dousset,et al.  Routine clinical examination is not sufficient for diagnosing and locating deeply infiltrating endometriosis. , 2002, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[10]  P. Koninckx,et al.  Treatment of deeply infiltrating endometriosis. , 1994, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[11]  E. Lesaffre,et al.  Suggestive evidence that pelvic endometriosis is a progressive disease, whereas deeply infiltrating endometriosis is associated with pelvic pain. , 1991, Fertility and sterility.

[12]  P. Koninckx,et al.  Deeply infiltrating pelvic endometriosis: histology and clinical significance. , 1990, Fertility and sterility.

[13]  D. Olive,et al.  Endometriosis: Pathogenetic Implications of the Anatomic Distribution , 1986, Obstetrics and gynecology.