Automatic left ventricle detection in MRI images using marginal space learning and component-based voting

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is currently the gold standard for left ventricle (LV) quantification. Detection of the LV in an MRI image is a prerequisite for functional measurement. However, due to the large variations in orientation, size, shape, and image intensity of the LV, automatic detection of the LV is still a challenging problem. In this paper, we propose to use marginal space learning (MSL) to exploit the recent advances in learning discriminative classifiers. Instead of learning a monolithic classifier directly in the five dimensional object pose space (two dimensions for position, one for orientation, and two for anisotropic scaling) as full space learning (FSL) does, we train three detectors, namely, the position detector, the position-orientation detector, and the position-orientation-scale detector. Comparative experiments show that MSL significantly outperforms FSL in both speed and accuracy. Additionally, we also detect several LV landmarks, such as the LV apex and two annulus points. If we combine the detected candidates from both the whole-object detector and landmark detectors, we can further improve the system robustness. A novel voting based strategy is devised to combine the detected candidates by all detectors. Experiments show component-based voting can reduce the detection outliers.

[1]  Victor Mor-Avi,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Left Ventricular Size and Function: Side-by-Side Comparison of Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography and Computed Tomography With Magnetic Resonance Reference , 2006, Circulation.

[2]  Larry S. Davis,et al.  Bilattice-based Logical Reasoning for Human Detection , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[3]  Gustavo Carneiro,et al.  Automatic Fetal Measurements in Ultrasound Using Constrained Probabilistic Boosting Tree , 2007, MICCAI.

[4]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Accurate polyp segmentation for 3D CT colongraphy using multi-staged probabilistic binary learning and compositional model , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[5]  Zhuowen Tu,et al.  Probabilistic boosting-tree: learning discriminative models for classification, recognition, and clustering , 2005, Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1.

[6]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Fast Automatic Heart Chamber Segmentation from 3D CT Data Using Marginal Space Learning and Steerable Features , 2007, 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[7]  Juyang Weng,et al.  Learning-based ventricle detection from cardiac MR and CT images , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Biomedical Image Analysis.

[8]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Database-guided segmentation of anatomical structures with complex appearance , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[9]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Four-chamber heart modeling and automatic segmentation for 3D cardiac CT volumes , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[10]  Gustavo Carneiro,et al.  Semantic-based indexing of fetal anatomies from 3-D ultrasound data using global/semi-local context and sequential sampling , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[11]  Ludmila I. Kuncheva,et al.  Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms , 2004 .

[12]  Tomaso A. Poggio,et al.  Pedestrian detection using wavelet templates , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[13]  David A. McAllester,et al.  A discriminatively trained, multiscale, deformable part model , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[14]  K. Furie,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2007, Circulation.

[15]  Ramakant Nevatia,et al.  Segmentation of multiple, partially occluded objects by grouping, merging, assigning part detection responses , 2008, CVPR.

[16]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  3D ultrasound tracking of the left ventricle using one-step forward prediction and data fusion of collaborative trackers , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[17]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Simultaneous Detection and Registration for Ileo-Cecal Valve Detection in 3D CT Colonography , 2008, ECCV.

[18]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Learning-based object detection in cardiac MR images , 1999, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[19]  Zhuowen Tu,et al.  Probabilistic 3D Polyp Detection in CT Images: The Role of Sample Alignment , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[20]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[21]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Hierarchical, learning-based automatic liver segmentation , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.