The emotional cost of charitable donations

Donations in support of a charitable cause can create a conflict between moral intuitions (e.g., fulfilling moral obligations and helping as many individuals in need as possible) and the cost entailed by following one's moral intuitions (e.g., spending money). The present paper investigates this conflict by putting people in a situation in which they must choose whether to help three women by giving more money or help one woman by giving less. In addition, the paper uses the attraction effect paradigm to counteract the single victim effect and reduce the conflict. Experiment 1 demonstrates that in a two-alternative context the majority of participants choose to help one woman by giving €150 instead of helping three women by giving €450. Experiment 2 replicates this finding and highlights the role of emotion regulation strategies in the management of the emotional conflict arising in the two-alternative condition. In both studies, the introduction of a third, dominated alternative reduces the conflict and makes it easier to choose the programme asking for a higher donation and helping three women. Implications for charitable donations and the role of the conflict between moral intuitions and economic costs are discussed.

[1]  L. L. Shaw,et al.  Information function of empathic emotion: learning that we value the other's welfare , 1995 .

[2]  L. Sjöberg,et al.  Money Attitudes and Emotional Intelligence , 2006 .

[3]  R. Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. , 1960 .

[4]  Paul Slovic,et al.  “If I look at the mass I will never act”: Psychic numbing and genocide , 2007, Judgment and Decision Making.

[5]  J. Andreoni.  Giving gifts to groups: How altruism depends on the number of recipients , 2007 .

[6]  G. Zinkhan,et al.  Changes in consumer choice: Further investigation of similarity and attraction effects , 1987 .

[7]  A. Tenbrunsel,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2013 .

[8]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  Empathy and attitudes: can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  J. Haidt.  The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. , 2001, Psychological review.

[10]  David A. Schroeder,et al.  The arousal: Cost-reward model and the process of intervention , 1991 .

[11]  C. Batson,et al.  An additional antecedent of empathic concern: valuing the welfare of the person in need. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  P. Slovic,et al.  Affective Motivations to Help Others: A Two-Stage Model of Donation Decisions , 2011 .

[13]  Scott Highhouse,et al.  Context-Dependent Selection: The Effects of Decoy and Phantom Job Candidates , 1996 .

[14]  J. Gross.  Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  O. John,et al.  Emotion Regulation in Everyday Life. , 2006 .

[16]  Ilana Ritov,et al.  The ''Identified Victim'' Effect: An Identified Group, or Just a Single Individual? , 2005 .

[17]  J. Gross,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Emotion Regulation and Memory: The Cognitive Costs of Keeping One's Cool , 2004 .

[18]  D. Kahneman.  Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics , 2003 .

[19]  James J. Gross,et al.  A Spanish Adaptation of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire , 2010 .

[20]  Deborah A. Small,et al.  Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. , 2007 .

[21]  O. John,et al.  Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  William M. Hedgcock,et al.  Trade-Off Aversion as an Explanation for the Attraction Effect: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2009 .

[23]  A. L. Beaman,et al.  Empathy-based helping: is it selflessly or selfishly motivated? , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Jonathan Haidt,et al.  Sexual morality: The cultures and emotions of conservatives and liberals. , 2001 .

[25]  Kevin L. Harrell,et al.  Empathic joy and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  R. Zajonc.  Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[27]  A. Mellers,et al.  Emotion Regulation in Adulthood: Timing Is Everything , 2001 .

[28]  L. L. Shaw,et al.  Empathy avoidance: Forestalling feeling for another in order to escape the motivational consequences. , 1994 .

[29]  Goslin,et al.  Handbook of socialization theory and research , 1969 .

[30]  E. Turiel,et al.  The Development of Social Knowledge: Morality and Convention , 1983 .

[31]  L. Wheeler,et al.  Review of personality and social psychology , 1980 .

[32]  S. Epstein.  Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[33]  Christopher P. Puto,et al.  Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity & the Similarity Hypothesis. , 1981 .

[34]  J. Doyle,et al.  The robustness of the asymmetrically dominated effect: Buying frames, phantom alternatives, and in‐store purchases , 1999 .

[35]  J. Haidt,et al.  Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  R. Lazarus,et al.  SHORT-CIRCUITING OF THREAT BY EXPERIMENTALLY ALTERING COGNITIVE APPRAISAL. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[37]  C. Rogers.  Client-Centered Therapy: Its Current Practice, Implications and Theory , 1951 .

[38]  James J. Gross,et al.  Emotion Regulation in Adulthood: Timing Is Everything , 2001 .

[39]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Explaining the Identifiable Victim Effect , 1997 .

[40]  B. Payne,et al.  Escaping affect: how motivated emotion regulation creates insensitivity to mass suffering. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  Gary H. McClelland,et al.  Animation Attracts: The Attraction Effect in an On-line Shopping Environment. , 2006 .

[42]  E. Rubaltelli,et al.  Strengthening acceptance for xenotransplantation: the case of attraction effect , 2008, Xenotransplantation.

[43]  K. Berridge,et al.  What is an unconscious emotion?(The case for unconscious "liking") , 2003, Cognition & emotion.

[44]  R. Luce,et al.  The Choice Axiom after Twenty Years , 1977 .

[45]  Mary Frances Luce,et al.  Emotional Decisions: Tradeoff Difficulty and Coping in Consumer Choice , 2001 .

[46]  Ilana Ritov,et al.  The singularity effect of identified victims in separate and joint evaluations , 2005 .

[47]  J. Gross.  Emotion Regulation: Past, Present, Future , 1999 .

[48]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Options: A Review and Theoretical Analysis , 1999 .

[49]  I. Simonson,et al.  Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .

[50]  L. Kohlberg.  Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization , 1969 .

[51]  David A Pizarro.  Nothing More than Feelings? The Role of Emotions in Moral Judgment , 2000 .

[52]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis , 1979 .

[53]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  Trait Self and True Self: Cross-Role Variation in the Big-Five Personality Traits and Its Relations With Psychological Authenticity and Subjective Well-Being , 1997 .