Four Decades of Progress in Monitoring and Modeling of Processes in the Soil-Plant- Atmosphere System: Applications and Challenges Principles and applications of a new class of soil water matric potential sensors: the dihedral tensiometer

Abstract Soil tensiometers are instruments to measure directly, without calibration, the soil matric potential between zero and the barometric pressure, but in practice it is functional up to about 85 kPa, allowing monitoring continuously the soil water status for irrigation scheduling and other hydrological applications. The major drawback of these instruments is water cavitation, which causes interruption of measurements (tension breakdown) and requires instrument re-saturation. In order to avoid the major problems related with common tensiometers, a new class of instruments named dihedral tensiometers was developed at the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation. In this new class of instruments two rectangular hydrophilic flat glass plates or one glass plate with a fine porous flat plate are fixed in angle, defining the dihedral angle. The distance from the vertex to the water meniscus (L) formed after equilibration is linearly proportional to the soil matric potential. Using different spacer thickness between the two flat plates allows constructing sensors for different matric potential ranges and applications. Several dihedral tensiometer prototypes have been designed, constructed and tested for matric potential measurements in pot substrates and soils. Results shows linear responses between the applied water potential, using a Richards chamber as reference, and the distance L. Time responses was of few minutes to about 40 min, depending on the range of measurement, on the spacer thickness, and on the porous element properties and length. Results of experiments performed in laboratory are presented and discussed as well as the basic principles and construction details of the dihedral tensiometer are described.

[1]  P. M. Biesheuvel,et al.  Response of the osmotic tensiometer to varying temperatures : modeling and experimental validation , 1999 .

[2]  T. J. Marshall Relations Between Water and Soil , 1959 .

[3]  Alessandro Tarantino,et al.  Experimental procedures and cavitation mechanisms in tensiometer measurements , 2001 .

[4]  Dongqing Li Encyclopedia of Microfluidics and Nanofluidics , 2008 .

[5]  W. D. Kemper,et al.  UTILIZATION OF AIR PERMEABILITY OF POROUS CERAMICS AS A MEASURE OF HYDRAULIC STRESS IN SOILS , 1958 .

[6]  M. Ploeg,et al.  Polymer tensiometers with ceramic cones: direct observations of matric pressures in drying soils , 2010 .

[7]  K. Metselaar,et al.  Pressure Heads and Simulated Water Uptake Patterns for a Severely Stressed Bean Crop , 2012 .

[8]  D. Or,et al.  Soil Water Potential Measurement , 2006 .

[9]  Dani Or,et al.  Nonlinear Parameter Estimation Using Spreadsheet Software , 1998 .

[10]  M. Zaman-Allah,et al.  Ecological engineering : from concepts to applications Nodular diagnosis for ecological engineering of the symbiotic nitrogen fixation with legumes , 2011 .

[11]  F. A. Peyton,et al.  Capillary penetration between dissimilar solids , 1968 .

[12]  G. Rooij,et al.  New Polymer Tensiometers: Measuring Matric Pressures Down to the Wilting Point , 2007 .

[13]  P. Silberzan,et al.  Microfluidics for biotechnology , 2005 .

[14]  T. Simonneau,et al.  TENSIOMETRIC MEASUREMENT AND METASTABLE STATE OF WATER UNDER TENSION , 1993 .

[15]  P. Paschold,et al.  IRRIGAS - A NEW SIMPLE SOIL MOISTURE SENSOR FOR IRRIGATION SCHEDULING , 2004 .

[16]  A. J. Peck,et al.  Design and Performance of an Osmotic Tensiometer for Measuring Capillary Potential1 , 1969 .

[17]  Washington L. C. Silva,et al.  Gaseous irrigation control system: descriptionand physical tests for performance assessment , 2006 .