Consistent classification of image time series with automatic adaptive signature generalization

Abstract Long-term data archives such as Landsat offer the potential for understanding land cover dynamics over large areas, but limited progress has been made towards realizing this potential due to data availability and computational limitations. Those limitations are less relevant now, and there is renewed interest in developing reliable methods of automatically and consistently classifying time series of remotely sensed images. Our objective was to develop a method of automatically classifying temporally irregular time series (i.e., non-anniversary date images in consecutive years) of images with a minimum of parameterization and a priori information. In contrast to traditional signature extension methods, the automatic adaptive signature generalization procedure (AASG) adapts class spectral signatures to individual images and therefore requires no image correction procedure. Class signatures are derived from pixels with stable land cover through time. We tested the performance of AASG relative to traditional signature extension with various image corrections, and explored the sensitivity of AASG to a thresholding parameter ( c ) controlling stable site identification. AASG performed as well as signature extension with atmospheric correction ( κ  = 0.68), and better than signature extension with relative ( κ  = 0.65) and TOA reflectance ( κ  = 0.56) image corrections for a summer–summer image pair. Additionally, we demonstrated the unique ability of AASG to adapt class signatures to phenological differences by classifying a summer–winter image pair with a modest reduction in overall accuracy ( κ  = 0.66). Observed sensitivity to c supported the hypothesis of an optimum value yielding enough training sites to describe class spectral variability, but conservative enough to minimize contamination of signatures due to classification errors. AASG offers significant advantages over traditional signature extension, particularly for temporally irregular time series. Although we demonstrated a simple implementation, the AASG approach is flexible and we outline several refinements which stand to improve performance. This development represents significant progress towards realizing the potential of long-term data archives to gain long-term understandings of global land cover dynamics.

[1]  Christopher Justice,et al.  The impact of misregistration on change detection , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[2]  B. Markham,et al.  Summary of Current Radiometric Calibration Coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI Sensors , 2009 .

[3]  M. Ridd,et al.  A Comparison of Four Algorithms for Change Detection in an Urban Environment , 1998 .

[4]  S. Stehman Estimating the Kappa Coefficient and its Variance under Stratified Random Sampling , 1996 .

[5]  James D. Wickham,et al.  Pixels, blocks of pixels, and polygons: Choosing a spatial unit for thematic accuracy assessment , 2011 .

[6]  M. Fiorella,et al.  Determining successional stage of temperate coniferous forests with Landsat satellite data , 1993 .

[7]  Limin Yang,et al.  COMPLETION OF THE 1990S NATIONAL LAND COVER DATA SET FOR THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES FROM LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER DATA AND ANCILLARY DATA SOURCES , 2001 .

[8]  Curtis E. Woodcock,et al.  Utilizing Temporally Invariant Calibration Sites to Classify Multiple Dates and Types of Satellite Imagery , 2011 .

[9]  Michael A. Wulder,et al.  Remote sensing methods in medium spatial resolution satellite data land cover classification of large areas , 2002 .

[10]  Robert H. Fraser,et al.  Signature extension through space for northern landcover classification: A comparison of radiometric correction methods , 2005 .

[11]  C. Jordan Derivation of leaf-area index from quality of light on the forest floor , 1969 .

[12]  M. Bauer,et al.  Digital change detection in forest ecosystems with remote sensing imagery , 1996 .

[13]  T. Minter Methods of extending crop signatures from one area to another , 1979 .

[14]  Curtis E. Woodcock,et al.  Monitoring large areas for forest change using Landsat: Generalization across space, time and Landsat sensors , 2001 .

[15]  J. Townshend,et al.  NDVI-derived land cover classifications at a global scale , 1994 .

[16]  S. Sader,et al.  Spatial characteristics of forest clearing and vegetation regrowth as detected by Landsat Thematic Mapper imagery , 1995 .

[17]  Jin Chen,et al.  Mapping impervious surface expansion using medium-resolution satellite image time series: a case study in the Yangtze River Delta, China , 2012 .

[18]  Conghe Song,et al.  Long-term land cover dynamics by multi-temporal classification across the Landsat-5 record , 2013 .

[19]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Classification and Change Detection Using Landsat TM Data: When and How to Correct Atmospheric Effects? , 2001 .

[20]  S. Goetz,et al.  Radiometric rectification - Toward a common radiometric response among multidate, multisensor images , 1991 .

[21]  D. Lu,et al.  Change detection techniques , 2004 .

[22]  John E. Estes,et al.  Studying the Earth's Vegetation from Space , 1984 .

[23]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[24]  Stephen V. Stehman,et al.  A Strategy for Estimating the Rates of Recent United States Land-Cover Changes , 2002 .

[25]  Ashbindu Singh,et al.  Review Article Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data , 1989 .

[26]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Global Consequences of Land Use , 2005, Science.

[27]  Pol Coppin,et al.  Change Detection in Forest Ecosystems with Remote Sensing Digital Imagery , 1996 .

[28]  E. Lambin,et al.  Land-Cover-Change Trajectories in Southern Cameroon , 2000 .

[29]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[30]  Kelley A. Crews-Meyer,et al.  Assessing Landscape Change and Population‐Environment Interactions via Panel Analysis , 2001 .

[31]  Janet Franklin,et al.  Mapping land-cover modifications over large areas: A comparison of machine learning algorithms , 2008 .

[32]  P. O. Adeniyi,et al.  An enhanced classification approach to change detection in semi-arid environments , 1988 .

[33]  Conghe Song,et al.  Forest mapping with a generalized classifier and Landsat TM data , 2001 .

[34]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS , 1973 .

[35]  Zhiqiang Yang,et al.  Detecting trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly Landsat time series: 1. LandTrendr — Temporal segmentation algorithms , 2010 .

[36]  Stephen V. Stehman,et al.  Basic probability sampling designs for thematic map accuracy assessment , 1999 .

[37]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment , 2002 .

[38]  Limin Yang,et al.  Development of a 2001 National land-cover database for the United States , 2004 .

[39]  R. DeFries,et al.  Land‐use choices: balancing human needs and ecosystem function , 2004 .

[40]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Global land cover mapping from MODIS: algorithms and early results , 2002 .

[41]  Robert H. Fraser,et al.  Monitoring land cover change and ecological integrity in Canada's national parks , 2009 .