Multi-risk governance for natural hazards in Naples and Guadeloupe

Technical and institutional capacities are strongly related and must be jointly developed to guarantee effective natural risk governance. Indeed, the available technical solutions and decision support tools influence the development of institutional frameworks and disaster policies. This paper analyses technical and institutional capacities, by providing a comparative evaluation of governance systems in Italy and France. The focus is on two case studies: Naples and Guadeloupe. Both areas are exposed to multiple hazards, including earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, landslides, floods, tsunamis, fires, cyclones, and marine inundations Cascade and conjoint effects such as seismic swarms triggered by volcanic activity have also been taken into account. The research design is based on a documentary analysis of laws and policy documents informed by semi-structured interviews and focus groups with stakeholders at the local level. This leads to the identification of three sets of governance characteristics that cover the key issues of: (1) stakeholders and governance level; (2) decision support tools and mitigation measures; and (3) stakeholder cooperation and communication. The results provide an overview of the similarities and differences as well as the strengths and weaknesses of the governance systems across risks. Both case studies have developed adequate decision support tools for most of the hazards of concern. Warning systems, and the assessment of hazards and exposure are the main strengths. While technical/scientific capacities are very well developed, the main weaknesses involve the interagency communication and cooperation, and the use and dissemination of scientific knowledge when developing policies and practices. The consequences for multi-risk governance are outlined in the discussion.

[1]  Antonio A. R. Ioris,et al.  Integrating water and agricultural management: collaborative governance for a complex policy problem. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  Sarah Coulthard,et al.  Assessing the social wellbeing of Northern Ireland's fishing society using a three-dimensional approach , 2013 .

[3]  Henrik Paul Bang,et al.  Governance as social and political communication , 2003 .

[4]  William Allsop,et al.  Flood Risk Management: Research and Practice , 2009 .

[5]  B. Jessop.  The rise of governance and the risks of failure: the case of economic development , 1998 .

[6]  M. Thompson,et al.  Clumsy Solutions for a Complex World: Governance, Politics and Plural Perceptions , 2006 .

[7]  Anna Scolobig,et al.  The effects of decentralization on the production and use of risk assessment: insights from landslide management in India and Italy , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[8]  Riyanti Djalante,et al.  Adaptive governance and managing resilience to natural hazards , 2011 .

[9]  David W. Cash,et al.  Countering the Loading-Dock Approach to Linking Science and Decision Making , 2006 .

[10]  Tony Bovaird,et al.  Evaluating the Quality of Public Governance: Indicators, Models and Methodologies , 2003 .

[11]  Svein Jentoft,et al.  A communicative turnaround: Shifting the burden of proof in European fisheries governance , 2013 .

[12]  U. F. Paleo,et al.  Risk Governance: The Articulation of Hazard, Politics and Ecology , 2015 .

[13]  Marleen van Rijswick,et al.  Strengthening and Redesigning European Flood Risk Practices Towards Appropriate and Resilient Flood Risk Governance Arrangements Flood Risk Management in Europe: An exploration of Governance Challenges , 2013 .

[14]  Mark Bevir,et al.  Key Concepts in Governance , 2008 .

[15]  B. Marchi.  Public participation and risk governance , 2003 .

[16]  Hervé Corvellec,et al.  The practice of risk governance: lessons from the field , 2012 .

[17]  M. Korstanje.  The Risk Society: Towards a new modernity , 2009 .

[18]  F. Trentmann,et al.  Introduction: Consumption and Citizenship in the New Governance , 2007 .

[19]  Ortwin Renn.  Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World , 2008 .

[20]  R. Rhodes,et al.  The New Governance: Governing without Government , 1996 .

[21]  Aart Kraay,et al.  Aggregating Governance Indicators , 1999 .

[22]  B. Jessop.  The rise of governance and the risks of failure: the case of economic development , 1998 .

[23]  Warner Marzocchi,et al.  Project number: 265138 Project name: New methodologies for multi-hazard and multi-risk assessment methods for Europe , 2013 .

[24]  F. Trentmann,et al.  Governance, consumers and citizens: agency and resistance in contemporary politics , 2007 .

[25]  Saburo Ikeda,et al.  An emergent framework of disaster risk governance towards innovating coping capability for reducing disaster risks in local communities , 2011 .

[26]  Mikael Hildén,et al.  Integrated risk assessment and risk governance as socio-political phenomena: a synthetic view of the challenges. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[27]  Paola Petrosino,et al.  Volcanic hazard and risk assessment in a multi-source volcanic area: the example of Napoli city (Southern Italy) , 2011 .

[28]  Will Medd,et al.  Risk governance and natural hazards , 2011 .

[29]  B. Crona,et al.  The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? , 2009 .

[30]  Bernd Siebenhüner,et al.  Earth system governance: a research framework , 2010 .

[31]  P. Kabat,et al.  Analytical lenses on barriers in the governance of climate change adaptation , 2014, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[32]  B. De Marchi.  Not just a matter of knowledge. The Katrina debacle , 2007 .

[33]  John Handmer,et al.  The handbook of disaster and emergency policies and institutions , 2007 .

[34]  A. Scolobig,et al.  Social and institutional barriers to effective multi-hazard and multi-risk decision making and governance , 2013 .

[35]  P. '. Hart,et al.  Understanding policy fiascoes , 1995 .

[36]  Niklas Luhmann,et al.  Risiko und Gefahr , 1990 .

[37]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Risk governance , 2011 .

[38]  Maria Laura Mastellone,et al.  Basic principles of multi-risk assessment: a case study in Italy , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[39]  DeMond Shondell Miller.  Handbook of Disaster and Emergency Policies and Institutions , 2010 .

[40]  Céline Grislain-Letrémy,et al.  L'assurance habitation dans les départements d'Outre-mer: une faible souscription (Home Insurance in Overseas Départements: A Low Proportion of Households Insured) , 2010 .

[41]  Rebecca Whittle,et al.  A framework for profiling the characteristics of risk governance in natural hazard contexts , 2013 .

[42]  Limits to Ecological Modernisation as a framework for sustainable fresh water governance , 2011 .

[43]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  Coping with Complexity, Uncertainty and Ambiguity in Risk Governance: A Synthesis , 2011, AMBIO.

[44]  Bruna De Marchi,et al.  Not just a matter of knowledge. The Katrina debacle , 2007 .

[45]  東京電力福島原子力発電所事故調査委員会.  The official report of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission : executive summary , 2012 .

[46]  Martin Beniston,et al.  Impacts of climatic change on water and natural hazards in the Alps: Can current water governance cope with future challenges? Examples from the European “ACQWA” project , 2011 .

[47]  J. Graham,et al.  Risk Governance Deficits: An analysis and illustration of the most common deficits in risk governance , 2009 .

[48]  Andrew Martin,et al.  Governance of environmental risk: new approaches to managing stakeholder involvement. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[49]  F. Biermann.  Earth system governance as a crosscutting theme of global change research , 2007 .

[50]  Bob Jessop,et al.  Governance and Metagovernance: On Reflexivity, Requisite Variety, and Requisite Irony. , 2003 .

[51]  Frans van Waarden,et al.  ‘Governance’ as a bridge between disciplines: Cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy , 2004 .

[52]  R. Rhodes.  Understanding governance : policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability , 1997 .