Removal Torque and Bone Adherence to Dental Implants Surface

The primary stability is an important factor in achieving a predictable dental implant treatment. Therefore, in order to reach longitudinal success, it is necessary to achieve and to maintain the primary stability as basic pre-requirement [1,2]. The primary stability can be considered the first stabilization that is obtained immediately after implant insertion [3]. Thus, the insertion torque during implant installation may be an indicative of implant survival [4]. However, the initial stability may not be a factor that assures the osseiointegration, because it can be influenced by bone properties, surgical techniques and implant design [3]. Consequently, the measurement of the insertion torque could not be the only parameter to predict the osseointegration success rate. Thus, there are studies that evaluate the implants surface treatment to investigate what may influence the prognosis [5-7]. After the initial wound healing, some features determine the secondary stability as the biological response to the surgical trauma, the conditions of the wound healing and the material of the implant per se [8]. Therefore, there is an increase in the contact in the bone-implant interface [8]. At the same time, the presence of osteocytes in the bone remodeling in the bone-implant interface as well as the amount of sclerostin, osteoprotegerin and RANKL influence this remodeling [9]. Thus, when a traumatic surgery is performed or load is applied before the right time can lead to a tissue injury, resulting in bone resorption [9]. The design of the dental implant has evolved to improve its mechanical, functional and esthetic efficiency [3-8]. Nonetheless, the events that occur in the bone-implant interface are still in need of further investigation [6,7]. Having that in mind, studies involving implants with different surface treatments and the understanding the effects of different torques are important to a more comprehensive knowledge of this surfaces and the interaction with the bone tissue [1-8]. Thus, the aim of this study was to analyze the influence of the insertion torque applied to titanium dental implants with different surface treatment (acid and fluoride) on the bone adherence to the implant surface after removal from rabbit tibia by scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) after 40 days of implantation.

[1]  J. Duyck,et al.  Effect of insertion torque on titanium implant osseointegration: an animal experimental study. , 2015, Clinical oral implants research.

[2]  A. Thor,et al.  Integration of fluoridated implants in onlay autogenous bone grafts - an experimental study in the rabbit tibia. , 2014, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[3]  L. O. Uyanık,et al.  Active implant periapical lesions leading to implant failure: two case reports. , 2014, The Journal of oral implantology.

[4]  A. Elkarargy Biological functionalization of dental implants with fibronectin: a scanning electron microscopic study. , 2014, International journal of health sciences.

[5]  A. Thor,et al.  Marginal bone-level alterations at implants installed in block versus particulate onlay bone grafts mixed with platelet-rich plasma in atrophic maxilla. a prospective 5-year follow-up study of 15 patients. , 2013, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[6]  P. Coelho,et al.  Influence of implant shape, surface morphology, surgical technique and bone quality on the primary stability of dental implants. , 2012, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[7]  A. Shimano,et al.  In vitro analysis of the influence of surface treatment of dental implants on primary stability. , 2012, Brazilian oral research.

[8]  A. Consolaro Osteocytes: On the central role of these cells in osseous pathobiology , 2012 .

[9]  Y. Carvalho,et al.  Novel production method of porous surface Ti samples for biomedical application , 2012, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[10]  P. Novotny,et al.  Implant insertional torque values predict outcomes. , 2011, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[11]  A. A. Del Bel Cury,et al.  Influence of high insertion torque on implant placement: an anisotropic bone stress analysis. , 2010, Brazilian dental journal.

[12]  G. C. Silva,et al.  Unusual presentation of active implant periapical lesions: a report of two cases. , 2010, Journal of oral science.

[13]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Determination of primary stability: a comparison of the surgeon's perception and objective measurements. , 2010, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[14]  J. Jansen,et al.  Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study. , 2010, Clinical oral implants research.

[15]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Survey of the Quality of Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Reporting of Research Using Animals , 2009, PloS one.

[16]  Carlos Nelson Elias,et al.  Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability and morphology) of titanium and dental implant removal torque. , 2008, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[17]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Removal torque and histomorphometric evaluation of bioceramic grit-blasted/acid-etched and dual acid-etched implant surfaces: an experimental study in dogs. , 2008, The Journal of Periodontology.

[18]  J. Davies,et al.  The effect of discrete calcium phosphate nanocrystals on bone-bonding to titanium surfaces. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[19]  I. Tekdemir,et al.  Biomechanical aspects of initial intraosseous stability and implant design: a quantitative micro-morphometric analysis. , 2006, Clinical oral implants research.

[20]  M. Quirynen,et al.  Predisposing conditions for retrograde peri-implantitis, and treatment suggestions. , 2005, Clinical oral implants research.

[21]  V. Ottani,et al.  Osteogenesis and Morphology of the Peri-Implant Bone Facing Dental Implants , 2004, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[22]  Kyung-Tae Park,et al.  The removal torque of titanium screw inserted in rabbit tibia treated by dual acid etching. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[23]  R. Nishimura,et al.  Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: a torque removal study in the rabbit. , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[24]  K Gotfredsen,et al.  Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface characteristics: an experimental study in rabbits. , 2000, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[25]  M. Ueda,et al.  Relationship between insertion torque and removal torque analyzed in fresh temporal bone. , 1991, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.