Shoe traction and surface compliance affect performance of soccer-related movements

Purpose: To determine how shoe-surface interaction, specifically traction and compliance, affects performance and biomechanics of soccer-related movements. Methods: Third generation artificial turf was installed in the laboratory to allow for kinetic and kinematic data collection both on the turf and on a laboratory surface (Pulastic sports surface). Twelve male athletes performed five 5 m sprint accelerations and five 180° sprint turns in three different shoe-surface conditions (indoor soccer shoe on the laboratory surface, indoor soccer shoe on the turf surface, soccer cleat on turf surface). Comparisons between the indoor shoe across surfaces indicated compliance effects and comparisons between the cleat and indoor shoe on turf indicated traction effects. Results: Performance increased for the sprint acceleration in the indoor shoe on the turf compared to the laboratory (1.04 s vs. 1.08 s); however, no further increase in acceleration performance occurred with the soccer cleat. For the turn movement, no change in performance occurred comparing the indoor shoe across surfaces however an increase in turn performance was seen when using the soccer cleat on turf compared to the indoor shoe (2.67 s vs. 2.56 s). The cleat had both increased utilised translational and rotational traction compared to the indoor shoe on turf for the turn movement. The cleat also resulted in increased ankle eversion moments as well as increased knee abduction and external rotation moments compared to the indoor shoe on the turf surface for the turn movement. Conclusion: Both compliance and traction shoe-surface characteristics affect performance; however, the effects of the different characteristics are different depending on the movement type.

[1]  Thomas L. Milani,et al.  Traction on artificial turf: development of a soccer shoe outsole , 2010 .

[2]  K. Bowers,et al.  Cleat-surface friction on new and old AstroTurf. , 1975, Medicine and science in sports.

[3]  K. Markolf,et al.  Combined knee loading states that generate high anterior cruciate ligament forces , 1995, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[4]  B M Nigg,et al.  Biomechanical aspects of playing surfaces. , 1987, Journal of sports sciences.

[5]  Youlian Hong,et al.  Human walks carefully when the ground dynamic coefficient of friction drops below 0.41 , 2009 .

[6]  Kathryn A. Severn,et al.  Science of synthetic turf surfaces: Player–surface interactions , 2010 .

[7]  Tron Krosshaug,et al.  Kinematics and kinetics of an accidental lateral ankle sprain. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Ross Sanders,et al.  Changes in net joint torques during accomodation to change in surface compliance in a drop jumping task , 1993 .

[9]  Benjamin Cooper,et al.  Effect of loading condition on the traction coefficient between shoes and artificial turf surfaces , 2010 .

[10]  John W Powell,et al.  Football Playing Surface and Shoe Design Affect Rotational Traction , 2009, The American journal of sports medicine.

[11]  B M Nigg,et al.  Energy aspects for elastic and viscous shoe soles and playing surfaces. , 1995, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[12]  P. Renström,et al.  Torque developed at simulated sliding between sport shoes and an artificial turf , 1986, The American journal of sports medicine.

[13]  Darren J. Stefanyshyn,et al.  Wear influences footwear traction properties in Canadian high school football , 2009 .

[14]  Darren J. Stefanyshyn,et al.  Identification of critical traction values for maximum athletic performance , 2011 .

[15]  Bowers Kd,et al.  Cleat-surface friction on new and old AstroTurf , 1975 .

[16]  Eric A Nauman,et al.  Peak Torque and Rotational Stiffness Developed at the Shoe-Surface Interface , 2006, The American journal of sports medicine.

[17]  Darren J. Stefanyshyn,et al.  The influence of soccer cleat design on resultant joint moments , 2010 .

[18]  T Lussiana,et al.  Effect of slope and footwear on running economy and kinematics , 2013, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[19]  Thorsten Sterzing,et al.  Comprehensive evaluation of player-surface interaction on artificial soccer turf , 2010, Sports biomechanics.

[20]  Amy E. Kerdok,et al.  Energetics and mechanics of human running on surfaces of different stiffnesses. , 2002, Journal of applied physiology.

[21]  Darren J. Stefanyshyn,et al.  Knee Angular Impulse as a Predictor of Patellofemoral Pain in Runners , 2006, The American journal of sports medicine.

[22]  Darren J Stefanyshyn,et al.  Footwear Traction and Lower Extremity Joint Loading , 2010, The American journal of sports medicine.

[23]  C. E. Clauser,et al.  Weight, volume, and center of mass of segments of the human body , 1969 .

[24]  J S Torg,et al.  The shoe-surface interface and its relationship to football knee injuries , 1974, The Journal of sports medicine.

[25]  M. Roderick,et al.  Fédération Internationale de Football Association , 2012 .

[26]  T. McMahon,et al.  The influence of track compliance on running. , 1979, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  T. Hewett,et al.  Biomechanical Measures of Neuromuscular Control and Valgus Loading of the Knee Predict Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk in Female Athletes: A Prospective Study , 2005, The American journal of sports medicine.

[28]  G Mornieux,et al.  Barefoot-shod running differences: shoe or mass effect? , 2008, International journal of sports medicine.

[29]  Adamantios Arampatzis,et al.  Interaction of the human body and surfaces of different stiffness during drop jumps. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[30]  Jerry L Mayhew,et al.  Comparison of Speed and Agility Performance of College Football Players on Field Turf and Natural Grass , 2010, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[31]  E C Frederick,et al.  Physiological and ergonomics factors in running shoe design. , 1984, Applied ergonomics.

[32]  Darren J. Stefanyshyn,et al.  The effect of normal load, speed and moisture on footwear traction , 2011 .

[33]  Kevin R Ford,et al.  Comparison of in-shoe foot loading patterns on natural grass and synthetic turf. , 2006, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[34]  Kathryn A. Severn,et al.  Science of synthetic turf surfaces: investigating traction behaviour , 2011 .

[35]  Wolfgang Potthast,et al.  Motion differences in goal kicking on natural and artificial soccer turf systems , 2010 .

[36]  Rudy Verhelst,et al.  Football-specific evaluation of player–surface interaction on different football turf systems , 2010 .

[37]  B M Nigg,et al.  The validity and relevance of tests used for the assessment of sports surfaces. , 1990, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[38]  John William Wannop Influence of basketball shoe mass, traction and bending stiffness on athletic performance , 2013 .