Blockchain Technology Adoption in Smart Learning Environments

The conventional education system in developing countries has been enhanced recently by implementing the latest technology of distributed ledger. Disruptive technology is a fundamental requirement for greater accountability and visibility. We explored the key factors affecting the intentions of educational institutions to use blockchain technology for e-learning. This study proposed an expanded model of Technology Acceptance Model by integrating the diffusion of innovation theory. Based on an online survey, the conceptual model was tested and validated using structural equation modeling. The results showed that compatibility had a significant impact on blockchain use in smart learning environments. Other significant effects were also found on adoption of blockchain technology. This study offers an expanded Technology Acceptance Model for implementing blockchain that could assist decision makers in building a smart learning environment for the educational institutes for the emerging economies.

[1]  Arab Ali Chérif,et al.  Towards a New Ubiquitous Learning Environment Based on Blockchain Technology , 2017, 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT).

[2]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Perceived usefulness, ease of use and user acceptance of blockchain technology for digital transactions – insights from user-generated content on Twitter , 2019, Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Paul Brody,et al.  The next digital gold rush: how the internet of things will create liquid, transparent markets , 2015 .

[4]  Berry Schoenmakers,et al.  The Adoption Process of Cryptocurrencies - Identifying factors that influence the adoption of cryptocurrencies from a multiple stakeholder perspective , 2014 .

[5]  Mahdi M. Alamri,et al.  The Role of Compatibility and Task-Technology Fit (TTF): On Social Networking Applications (SNAs) Usage as Sustainability in Higher Education , 2020, IEEE Access.

[6]  Taeyong Yang,et al.  Understanding the diffusion and adoption of Bitcoin transaction services: The integrated approach , 2020, Telematics Informatics.

[7]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Diffusion of blockchain technology , 2019, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[8]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Introduction of shared electronic records: multi-site case study using diffusion of innovation theory , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  Europe Singh,et al.  Learning theory and online technologies , 2014 .

[10]  Volker Roth,et al.  New Directions for Trust in the Certificate Authority Ecosystem , 2018, ArXiv.

[11]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[12]  Valerie L. Vaccaro,et al.  B2B green marketing and innovation theory for competitive advantage , 2009, J. Syst. Inf. Technol..

[13]  Svein Ølnes,et al.  Beyond Bitcoin Enabling Smart Government Using Blockchain Technology , 2016, EGOV.

[14]  Florian Hawlitschek,et al.  The limits of trust-free systems: A literature review on blockchain technology and trust in the sharing economy , 2018, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[15]  C. Fornell,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics , 1981 .

[16]  Proceso Fernandez,et al.  CredenceLedger: A Permissioned Blockchain for Verifiable Academic Credentials , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC).

[17]  Bih-Shiaw Jaw,et al.  Blockchain Technology Adoption Behavior and Sustainability of the Business in Tourism and Hospitality SMEs: An Empirical Study , 2020, Sustainability.

[18]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Technology Readiness Index (Tri) , 2000 .

[19]  Eldon Y. Li,et al.  Integrating Innovation Diffusion Theory and the Technology Acceptance Model: The adoption of blockchain technology from business managers’ perspective , 2017 .

[20]  Nian-Shing Chen,et al.  Exploring blockchain technology and its potential applications for education , 2018, Smart Learning Environments.

[21]  Miftachul Huda,et al.  Big Data Emerging Technology: Insights into Innovative Environment for Online Learning Resources , 2018, Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn..

[22]  Rudolf Ruland,et al.  Blockchain for Education: Lifelong Learning Passport , 2020, ERCIM News.

[23]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  M. Miller,et al.  Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models , 2013, Educational and psychological measurement.

[25]  Mohammed Amin Almaiah,et al.  Applying the UTAUT Model to Explain the Students’ Acceptance of Mobile Learning System in Higher Education , 2019, IEEE Access.

[26]  Barbara Means,et al.  Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies , 2009 .

[27]  On the Performance of RESET and Durbin Watson Tests inDetecting Specification Error , 2014 .

[28]  Geoff Willis,et al.  Supply chain learning, integration, and flexibility performance: an empirical study in India , 2016 .

[29]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  Privacy and identity management in Learning Analytics processes with Blockchain , 2018, TEEM.

[30]  Lee T. Ostrom,et al.  Using Likert-Type Scales in the Social Sciences. , 2011 .

[31]  Maik Moeller,et al.  Learning In Adulthood A Comprehensive Guide , 2016 .

[32]  Keenan A. Pituch,et al.  The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[33]  Tatsuya Sato,et al.  Smart-Contract Based System Operations for Permissioned Blockchain , 2018, 2018 9th IFIP International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS).

[34]  Wynne W. Chin.  The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[35]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  E-Learning in Organizations , 2005 .

[36]  A. Alzahrani,et al.  Digital Communication: Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Usage for Education Sustainability , 2020 .

[37]  Edward Shih-Tse Wang.  Perceived control and gender difference on the relationship between trialability and intent to play new online games , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[38]  Ahmed Aldraiweesh,et al.  Massive open online courses (MOOCS): systematic literature review in Malaysian higher education , 2018, International Journal of Engineering & Technology.

[39]  Dirk Neumann,et al.  Dynamics of Blockchain Implementation - A Case Study from the Energy Sector , 2018, HICSS.

[40]  Samuel Fosso Wamba,et al.  Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA , 2019, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[41]  Rongfang Bie,et al.  Blockchain-enabled digital rights management for multimedia resources of online education , 2019, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[42]  Blake Ives,et al.  Web-based Virtual Learning Environments: a Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effectiveness in Basic It Skills Training Author(s): Piccoli Et Al./web-based Virtual Learning Environments Web-based Virtual Learning Environments: a Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effe , 2022 .

[43]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: A Model Comparison Approach , 2001, Decis. Sci..

[44]  Achmad Nizar Hidayanto,et al.  The Affecting Factors of Blockchain Technology Adoption of Payments Systems in Indonesia Banking Industry , 2018, 2018 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech).

[45]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Rogers’ Innovation Adoption Attributes: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Existing Research , 2014, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[46]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[47]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[48]  Mohammad S. Khan,et al.  Validation of TAM Model on Social Media Use for Collaborative Learning to Enhance Collaborative Authoring , 2019, IEEE Access.

[49]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  User Acceptance of Usable Blockchain-Based Research Data Sharing System: An Extended TAM-Based Study , 2019, 2019 First IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems and Applications (TPS-ISA).

[50]  Zhang Zhe,et al.  A review on consensus algorithm of blockchain , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[51]  Merija Jirgensons,et al.  Blockchain and the Future of Digital Learning Credential Assessment and Management , 2018, Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability.

[52]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Understanding the Blockchain technology adoption in supply chains-Indian context , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[53]  Bill C. Hardgrave,et al.  Investigating Determinants of Software Developers' Intentions to Follow Methodologies , 2003 .

[54]  Miltiadis D. Lytras,et al.  Social Commerce as a Driver to Enhance Trust and Intention to Use Cryptocurrencies for Electronic Payments , 2018, IEEE Access.

[55]  Marc A. Tomiuk,et al.  A Comparative Study on Parameter Recovery of Three Approaches to Structural Equation Modeling , 2010 .

[56]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Learning on Demand: Online Education in the United States, 2009. , 2010 .

[57]  David Metcalf,et al.  The Hyperledger Project , 2017 .

[58]  Chorng-Shyong Ong,et al.  Factors affecting engineers' acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[59]  F. George.  PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY OF LEARNING , 1961 .

[60]  Mohammed Amin Almaiah,et al.  Analysis the Effect of Different Factors on the Development of Mobile Learning Applications at Different Stages of Usage , 2020, IEEE Access.

[61]  Yusri Kamin,et al.  Social media – based collaborative learning: the effect on learning success with the moderating role of cyberstalking and cyberbullying , 2020, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[62]  Garry Wei-Han Tan,et al.  Time to seize the digital evolution: Adoption of blockchain in operations and supply chain management among Malaysian SMEs , 2020, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[63]  Hiroaki Ogata,et al.  Connecting decentralized learning records: a blockchain based learning analytics platform , 2018, LAK.

[64]  Diane J Skiba,et al.  The Potential of Blockchain in Education and Health Care. , 2017, Nursing education perspectives.

[65]  Su-Chao Chang,et al.  An empirical investigation of students' behavioural intentions to use the online learning course websites , 2007, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[66]  Yusri Kamin,et al.  Integrating innovation diffusion theory with technology acceptance model: supporting students’ attitude towards using a massive open online courses (MOOCs) systems , 2019, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[67]  Sung-Joon Yoon,et al.  Validation of Haptic Enabling Technology Acceptance Model (HE-TAM): Integration of IDT and TAM , 2014, Telematics Informatics.

[68]  Maciel M. Queiroz,et al.  Dynamics between blockchain adoption determinants and supply chain performance: An empirical investigation , 2020 .

[69]  Brijesh Dongol,et al.  A blockchain-enabled e-learning platform , 2020, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[70]  Jennifer P. Lundblad,et al.  A Review and Critique of Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation Theory as It Applies to Organizations , 2003 .

[71]  Matthias Mettler,et al.  Blockchain technology in healthcare: The revolution starts here , 2016, 2016 IEEE 18th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom).

[72]  Claus Pahl,et al.  An evaluation technique for content interaction in Web-based teaching and learning environments , 2003, Proceedings 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Technologies.

[73]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[74]  Rachna Shah,et al.  Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: Looking back and forward ☆ , 2006 .

[75]  김준환,et al.  The Effects of Technostress from using Blockchain on the Technology Acceptance Model(TAM) , 2019 .

[76]  M. Battour,et al.  Malaysian Muslim investors’ behaviour towards the blockchain-based Bitcoin cryptocurrency market , 2020 .

[77]  Osama Alfarraj,et al.  Integrated Three Theories to Develop a Model of Factors Affecting Students’ Academic Performance in Higher Education , 2019, IEEE Access.

[78]  Ahmed A. El-Masry,et al.  Understanding consumer intention to participate in online travel community and effects on consumer intention to purchase travel online and WOM: An integration of innovation diffusion theory and TAM with trust , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[79]  Zibin Zheng,et al.  An Overview of Blockchain Technology: Architecture, Consensus, and Future Trends , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Congress on Big Data (BigData Congress).

[80]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  A comparative analysis of strategies for egovernment in developing countries , 2014 .

[81]  R. Parente.  Digitalization, Consumer Social Responsibility, and Humane Entrepreneurship: Good news from the future? , 2020 .

[82]  David L Loudon,et al.  Physicians' Adoption of Pharmaceutical E-Detailing: Application of Rogers' Innovation-Diffusion Model , 2009 .

[83]  C. Fosnot.  Constructivism: a psychological theory of learning , 1996 .

[84]  Eugene Everard Etsebeth.  Trialability, perceived risk and complexity of understanding as determinants of cloud computing services adoption , 2013 .

[85]  John Domingue,et al.  The Blockchain and Kudos: A Distributed System for Educational Record, Reputation and Reward , 2016, EC-TEL.

[86]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies , 1999 .

[87]  M. Kara.  Distance education: a systems view of online learning , 2020 .

[88]  R. Dunlea.  Online Education in the United States, 2005 , 2005 .

[89]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations: Modifications of a Model for Telecommunications , 1995 .

[90]  Isabell M. Welpe,et al.  Disrupting Industries with Blockchain: The Industry, Venture Capital Funding, and Regional Distribution of Blockchain Ventures , 2018, HICSS.

[91]  Chen-Yuan Chen,et al.  An enhanced acceptance model for exploring user intention towards virtual reality environment: Partial least squares (PLS) statistical method , 2012 .

[92]  Marko Hölbl,et al.  EduCTX: A Blockchain-Based Higher Education Credit Platform , 2017, IEEE Access.

[93]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research , 2014 .

[94]  Gönenç Gürkaynak,et al.  Intellectual Property Law and Practice in the Blockchain Realm , 2018, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[95]  B. Lin,et al.  The blockchain-based Halal traceability systems: a hype or reality? , 2020, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal.

[96]  Steven Skiena,et al.  DeepWalk: online learning of social representations , 2014, KDD.

[97]  Joseph F. Hair,et al.  When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM , 2019, European Business Review.

[98]  Mun Y. Yi,et al.  Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[99]  C. Midden,et al.  INNOVATING ‘DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION’ THEORY: INNOVATION CHARACTERISTICS AND THE INTENTION OF UTILITY COMPANIES TO ADOPT ENERGY CONSERVATION INTERVENTIONS , 2002 .