Perceptions of driver distraction among teenage drivers

Teenage drivers have been shown to have some of the highest crash risks. Crash data provide some insights on factors related to crash likelihood, but rarely capture all issues that can arise from driver distraction. The goal of this study was to assess teenage drivers' opinions and perceptions of driver distraction. A survey of 1893 Iowa teenagers was conducted to determine and compare the frequency of engagement in distracting activities while driving to their opinions of what they actually consider to be distractions. A cluster analysis was conducted based on their indicated engagement in distracting activities with three groups emerging and classified as INFREQUENT, MODERATE, and FREQUENT engagers. Across all cluster groups, the majority (over 80%) indicated that they considered text messaging to be a distracting task. However, those clustered as FREQUENT engagers still reported a high level of texting while driving even though they considered this task to be distracting. A binary logistic regression model (adjusted for miles driven and license type) showed that FREQUENT and MODERATE engagers were more likely to be involved in a crash when compared to INFREQUENT engagers. The study demonstrates that not all teenagers place themselves at risk. There are subgroups of teenage drivers that often engage in activities they know are distracting, potentially putting themselves in danger. However, this is not the case for all teenage drivers and it is important to target interventions appropriately as well as foster a culture of safety both in schools and at home. Keywords: Driver distraction;

[1]  M L Matthews,et al.  Age differences in male drivers' perception of accident risk: the role of perceived driving ability. , 1986, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  I. Brown,et al.  Interference between concurrent tasks of driving and telephoning. , 1969, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  Differences in Off-Road Glances: Effects on Young Drivers’ Performance , 2010 .

[4]  Louis Tijerina,et al.  Using Cellular Telephones in Vehicles: Safe or Unsafe? , 1999 .

[5]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  The effect of distractions on the crash types of teenage drivers. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Driver Distraction From a Control Theory Perspective , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[7]  Michael J. Goodman,et al.  NHTSA DRIVER DISTRACTION RESEARCH: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE , 2001 .

[8]  K. Beck,et al.  Parental predictors of teen driving risk. , 2001, American journal of health behavior.

[9]  Amanda Lenhart,et al.  Teens and Distracted Driving: Texting, Talking and Other Uses of theCell Phone Behind the Wheel , 2009 .

[10]  John D. Lee,et al.  Driver Distraction : Theory, Effects, and Mitigation , 2008 .

[11]  Michael R. Elliott,et al.  National Young-Driver Survey: Teen Perspective and Experience With Factors That Affect Driving Safety , 2008, Pediatrics.

[12]  John D Lee,et al.  Technology and teen drivers. , 2007, Journal of safety research.

[13]  Eric Rodgman,et al.  Driver's exposure to distractions in their natural driving environment. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Jeff Allen Greenberg,et al.  EVALUATION OF DRIVER DISTRACTION USING AN EVENT DETECTION PARADIGM , 2003 .

[15]  Kenneth H Beck,et al.  Does Graduated Licensing Empower Parents to Place Greater Restrictions on Their Newly Licensed Teens’ Driving? , 2003, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[16]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  The Impact of Distraction Mitigation Strategies on Driving Performance , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[17]  Frank A. Drews,et al.  Cellular Phones and Driver Distraction , 2009 .

[18]  B G Simons-Morton,et al.  Promoting parental management of teen driving , 2002, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[19]  B. Wallace.  EXTERNAL-TO-VEHICLE DRIVER DISTRACTION , 2003 .

[20]  Frank Drews,et al.  Profiles in Driver Distraction: Effects of Cell Phone Conversations on Younger and Older Drivers , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[21]  Bruce D. Johnson,et al.  The Reliability and Validity of Drug Use Responses in a Large Scale Longitudinal Survey , 1975 .

[22]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  Jessica L. Hartos,et al.  Do Parent-Imposed Delayed Licensure and Restricted Driving Reduce Risky Driving Behaviors Among Newly Licensed Teens? , 2001, Prevention Science.

[24]  Niki Harré,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF RISKY DRIVING IN ADOLESCENCE , 2000 .

[25]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  The influence of driver distraction on the severity of injuries sustained by teenage drivers and their passengers. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  Thomas A Dingus,et al.  Naturalistic assessment of novice teenage crash experience. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  G. N. Lance,et al.  A General Theory of Classificatory Sorting Strategies: 1. Hierarchical Systems , 1967, Comput. J..

[28]  Moshe Eizenman,et al.  THE IMPACT OF COGNITIVE DISTRACTION ON DRIVER VISUAL BEHAVIOUR AND VEHICLE CONTROL , 2002 .

[29]  Susan A Ferguson,et al.  Other high-risk factors for young drivers--how graduated licensing does, doesn't, or could address them. , 2003, Journal of safety research.

[30]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  The distraction effects of phone use during a crucial driving maneuver. , 2003 .

[31]  Stephen W Marshall,et al.  Graduated driver licensing and fatal crashes involving 16- to 19-year-old drivers. , 2011, JAMA.

[32]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Acceptance of and engagement in risky driving behaviors by teenagers. , 2004, Adolescence.

[33]  M. Aldenderfer.  Cluster Analysis , 1984 .

[34]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  The Iowa Graduated Driver Licensing program: effectiveness in reducing crashes of teenage drivers. , 2008, Journal of safety research.

[35]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  THE EFFECT OF MOTORIST INFORMATION ON COMMUTER BEHAVIOR: CLASSIFICATION OF DRIVERS INTO COMMUTER GROUPS , 1993 .

[36]  Brian A. Jonah,et al.  Youth and risk: age differences in risky driving, risk perception, and risk utility , 1987 .

[37]  B W Bragg,et al.  Perception of the risk of an accident by young and older drivers. , 1986, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[38]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  Safety implications of providing real-time feedback to distracted drivers. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[39]  Torbjørn Rundmo,et al.  Using cluster analysis to test the cultural theory of risk perception , 2007 .

[40]  J. Violanti.  Cellular phones and traffic accidents. , 1997, Public health.

[41]  Daniel V. McGehee,et al.  Collision Warning Timing, Driver Distraction, and Driver Response to Imminent Rear-End Collisions in a High-Fidelity Driving Simulator , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[42]  E R Vingilis,et al.  School-based programmes for the prevention of drinking and driving: issues and results. , 1986, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[43]  D. Massie,et al.  Traffic accident involvement rates by driver age and gender. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[44]  Eric Rodgman,et al.  The role of driver distraction in traffic crashes , 2001 .

[45]  John D Lee,et al.  Extending parental mentoring using an event-triggered video intervention in rural teen drivers. , 2007, Journal of safety research.

[46]  J Lockhart,et al.  The effects of practice with MP3 players on driving performance. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[47]  Jun Ma,et al.  A dynamic analysis of person and household activity and travel patterns using data from the first two waves in the Puget Sound Transportation Panel , 1997 .

[48]  T. Dingus,et al.  The effect of passengers and risk-taking friends on risky driving and crashes/near crashes among novice teenagers. , 2011, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.