Identification of malignant masses on digital mammogram images based on texture feature and correlation based feature selection

The most popular techniques in early breast cancer detection is using digital mammogram. However, the challenge lies in early and accurate detection the irregular masses with spiculated margin as the most common abnormality. This paper proposes an image classifier to classify the mammogram images. The abnormality that can be founded in mammogram image is classified into malignant, benign and normal cases. By applying Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD), totally 12 features comprising of histogram and GLCM as the texture based features are extracted from the mammogram image. Correlation based feature selection (CFS) is used in this paper which reduces 50% of the features. Multilayer perceptron algorithm is applied to mammography classification by using these selected features. The experimental result shows that 40 digital mammograms data taken from private Oncology Clinic Kotabaru Yogyakarta was achieved 91.66% of accuracy. The approach can be beneficial to radiologists for more accurate diagnosis.

[1]  Rafayah Mousa,et al.  Breast cancer diagnosis system based on wavelet analysis and fuzzy-neural , 2005, Expert Syst. Appl..

[2]  Huijun Gao,et al.  Mammography visual enhancement in CAD-based breast cancer diagnosis. , 2013, Clinical imaging.

[3]  L.M. Bruce,et al.  Digital Mammogram Spiculated Mass Detection and Spicule Segmentation using Level Sets , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  Sameer Singh,et al.  Detection of masses in mammograms using texture features , 2000, Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000.

[5]  Sameer Singh,et al.  An evaluation of contrast enhancement techniques for mammographic breast masses , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[6]  Zhaohui Luo,et al.  Diagnosis of Breast Cancer Tumor Based on PCA and Fuzzy Support Vector Machine Classifier , 2008, 2008 Fourth International Conference on Natural Computation.

[7]  Heng-Da Cheng,et al.  Approaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammograms , 2006, Pattern Recognit..

[8]  John N. Wolfe Mammographic Parenchymal Patterns , 1982 .

[9]  Anil K. Jain Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing , 2018, Control of Color Imaging Systems.

[10]  M. Kallergi,et al.  Breast Tissue Density and CAD Cancer Detection in Digital Mammography , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[11]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[12]  Martin P. DeSimio,et al.  Computer-aided breast cancer detection and diagnosis of masses using difference of Gaussians and derivative-based feature saliency , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Hyung-Ji Lee,et al.  Computer aided diagnosis (CAD) of breast mass on ultrasonography and scintimammography , 2005, Proceedings of 7th International Workshop on Enterprise networking and Computing in Healthcare Industry, 2005. HEALTHCOM 2005..

[14]  G. Frankl Mammographic parenchymal patterns. , 1982, JAMA.

[15]  Kwabena Agyepong,et al.  Wavelet-based fractal feature extraction for microcalcification detection in mammograms , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE SoutheastCon 2010 (SoutheastCon).

[16]  A. Ramli,et al.  Computer-aided detection/diagnosis of breast cancer in mammography and ultrasound: a review. , 2013, Clinical imaging.

[17]  Leonardo Noriega,et al.  Multilayer Perceptron Tutorial , 2005 .

[18]  Dansheng Song,et al.  Ipsilateral multi-view CAD system for mass detection in digital mammography , 2001, Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis (MMBIA 2001).

[19]  H. Iwase,et al.  [Breast cancer]. , 2006, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.