Medial temporal lobe-dependent repetition suppression and enhancement due to implicit vs. explicit processing of individual repeated search displays

Using visual search, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and patient studies have demonstrated that medial temporal lobe (MTL) structures differentiate repeated from novel displays—even when observers are unaware of display repetitions. This suggests a role for MTL in both explicit and, importantly, implicit learning of repeated sensory information (Greene et al., 2007). However, recent behavioral studies suggest, by examining visual search and recognition performance concurrently, that observers have explicit knowledge of at least some of the repeated displays (Geyer et al., 2010). The aim of the present fMRI study was thus to contribute new evidence regarding the contribution of MTL structures to explicit vs. implicit learning in visual search. It was found that MTL activation was increased for explicit and, respectively, decreased for implicit relative to baseline displays. These activation differences were most pronounced in left anterior parahippocampal cortex (aPHC), especially when observers were highly trained on the repeated displays. The data are taken to suggest that explicit and implicit memory processes are linked within MTL structures, but expressed via functionally separable mechanisms (repetition-enhancement vs. -suppression). They further show that repetition effects in visual search would have to be investigated at the display level.

[1]  James R. Brockmole,et al.  Using real-world scenes as contextual cues for search , 2006 .

[2]  C. Li,et al.  Oculomotor correlates of context-guided learning in visual search , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  U. Neisser VISUAL SEARCH. , 1964, Scientific American.

[4]  M. Bar,et al.  The parahippocampal cortex mediates spatial and nonspatial associations. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  Lila Davachi,et al.  Working Memory Retrieval: Contributions of the Left Prefrontal Cortex, the Left Posterior Parietal Cortex, and the Hippocampus , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[7]  M. Chun,et al.  Selective attention modulates implicit learning , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[8]  Zhuanghua Shi,et al.  Contextual cueing in multiconjunction visual search is dependent on color- and configuration-based intertrial contingencies. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  M. Chun,et al.  Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  THE CONTROL OF THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE IN MULTIPLE TESTING UNDER DEPENDENCY , 2001 .

[11]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Temporal Autocorrelation in Univariate Linear Modeling of FMRI Data , 2001, NeuroImage.

[12]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[13]  Florin Dolcos,et al.  Similarities and Differences in the Neural Correlates of Episodic Memory Retrieval and Working Memory , 2002, NeuroImage.

[14]  K Lehnertz,et al.  Verbal novelty detection within the human hippocampus proper. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  T. Shallice,et al.  Face repetition effects in implicit and explicit memory tests as measured by fMRI. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL , 2009, NeuroImage.

[17]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[18]  Stefan Pollmann,et al.  Memory under pressure: secondary-task effects on contextual cueing of visual search. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[19]  R. Henson,et al.  A familiarity signal in human anterior medial temporal cortex? , 2003, Hippocampus.

[20]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[21]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[22]  Melina A. Kunar,et al.  Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  J. Gabrieli,et al.  Dissociation between explicit memory and configural memory in the human medial temporal lobe. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  Angela A. Manginelli,et al.  Misleading contextual cues: How do they affect visual search? , 2009, Psychological research.

[26]  Yuhong V Jiang,et al.  Spatial context learning survives interference from working memory load. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  Yuhong V. Jiang,et al.  Implicit learning of ignored visual context. , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  David R Shanks,et al.  Awareness in contextual cuing with extended and concurrent explicit tests , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[29]  M. Rugg,et al.  Retrieval processing and episodic memory , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  L. Squire,et al.  Perceptual learning, awareness, and the hippocampus , 2001, Hippocampus.

[32]  M. Chun,et al.  Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic subjects with hippocampal damage , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  Paul J. Reber,et al.  Neural correlates of contextual cueing are modulated by explicit learning , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  William L. Gross,et al.  Hippocampal differentiation without recognition: an fMRI analysis of the contextual cueing task. , 2007, Learning & memory.

[36]  G. Boynton,et al.  Adaptation: from single cells to BOLD signals , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[37]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[38]  Guillén Fernández,et al.  Process dissociation between contextual retrieval and item recognition , 2004, Neuroreport.

[39]  Axel Buchner,et al.  Learning versus behavioral expression of the learned: The effects of a secondary tone-counting task on implicit learning in the serial reaction task , 1998 .

[40]  L. Squire Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. , 1992, Psychological review.

[41]  K. Henke A model for memory systems based on processing modes rather than consciousness , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.