Biologic and clinicopathologic factors as indicators of specific relapse types in node-negative breast cancer.

PURPOSE AND METHODS We evaluated, in 1,800 patients with node-negative tumors treated with locoregional therapy until relapse, the competitive risks for different types of metastasis by cell proliferation (3H-thymidine labeling index [3H-dT LI]), estrogen receptors (ERs), and progesterone receptors (PgRs), and by the integration of biologic and clinicopathologic information. RESULTS Hormone receptor status and proliferative activity of the primary tumor were not indicative of contralateral failures. Hormone receptors failed to predict the 8-year incidence of locoregional recurrence, but they were significant indicators of distant metastasis and overall survival. The latter finding was confirmed even in multivariate analysis. Conversely, cell proliferation predicted both locoregional and distant metastases and survival, regardless of patient age, tumor size, and ER and PgR status. Recursive partitioning and amalgamation analysis ascribed to cell proliferation an important prognostic role for locoregional recurrence together with patient age and tumor size. CONCLUSION Biologic markers, in particular cell proliferation, provide information for the different types of relapse and could complement the predictive role of pathologic staging.

[1]  Giampietro Gasparini,et al.  Erratum: “Evaluating the Potential Usefulness of New Prognostic and Predictive Indicators in Node-Negative Breast Cancer Patients,” , 1993 .

[2]  D. Coradini,et al.  Cell kinetics as a predictive factor in node-positive breast cancer treated with adjuvant hormone therapy. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  G. Del Bino,et al.  Prognostic significance of proliferative activity and ploidy in node-negative breast cancers. , 1993, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[4]  W. McGuire,et al.  Prognosis and treatment decisions in patients with breast cancer without axillary node involvement , 1992, Cancer.

[5]  C. Osborne,et al.  Prognostic significance of S-phase fraction in good-risk, node-negative breast cancer patients. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  W. L. McGuire,et al.  Breast cancer prognostic factors: evaluation guidelines. , 1991, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  L. Mariani,et al.  3H-thymidine-labeling index as a prognostic indicator in node-positive breast cancer. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  G. Bonadonna,et al.  Cell kinetics as a prognostic indicator in node-negative breast cancer. , 1989, European journal of cancer & clinical oncology.

[9]  S. Koscielny,et al.  Growth rate, kinetics of tumor cell proliferation and long‐term outcome in human breast cancer , 1989, International journal of cancer.

[10]  D. Coradini,et al.  A Double-Labeling Assay for Simultaneous Estimation and Characterization of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors using Radioiodinated Estradiol and Tritiated Org 2058 , 1986, Tumori.

[11]  A. Luini,et al.  Comparing Radical Mastectomy with Quadrantectomy, Axillary Dissection, and Radiotherapy in Patients with Small Cancers of the Breast , 1981 .

[12]  J. Kalbfleisch,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data , 1980 .

[13]  D. Coradini,et al.  Biological characterisation of primary and metachronous lesions in breast cancer patients. , 1992, European journal of cancer.

[14]  R. Camplejohn,et al.  Proliferative activity, histological grade and benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in node positive breast cancer. , 1990, European journal of cancer.