The social network side of individual innovation

The current study provides a comprehensive analysis and integration of the literature on the social network correlates of individual innovation. Reviewing the extant literature, we cluster existing network measures into five general properties—size, strength, brokerage, closure, and diversity. Using meta-analysis, we estimate the population effect sizes between these network properties and innovation. Results showed that brokerage had the strongest positive relation to innovation, followed by size, diversity, and strength. Closure, by contrast, had a weak, negative association with innovation. In addition, we offer a path-analytic integration of the literature proposing and testing the direct and indirect effects of the five properties on innovation. We suggest that network size and strength impact innovation through a web of relations with the more proximal features of brokerage, closure, and diversity. Our path-analytic integration considers the two dominant perspectives on the effects of social networks—brokerage versus closure—simultaneously allowing us to establish their relative efficacy in predicting innovation. In addition, our model highlights that network strength can have both negative and positive effects (via different direct and indirect pathways) and thus inherently involves a tradeoff. We discuss the implications of these results for future research and practice.

[1]  Lorenzo Bizzi Social Capital in Organizations , 2015 .

[2]  F. Al-Shamali,et al.  Author Biographies. , 2015, Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation.

[3]  M. Černe,et al.  What Goes Around Comes Around: Knowledge Hiding, Perceived Motivational Climate, and Creativity , 2014 .

[4]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  The impact of network embeddedness on research output , 2013 .

[5]  Eldon Y. Li,et al.  Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective , 2013 .

[6]  A. Petruzzelli,et al.  When does centrality matter? Scientific productivity and the moderating role of research specialization and cross‐community ties , 2013 .

[7]  S. Chiu Position, experience, and knowledge creation: A longitudinal case study of Chinese academic networks , 2013 .

[8]  Catherine Beaudry,et al.  Follow the (Industry) Money – The Impact of Science Networks and Industry-to-University Contracts on Academic Patenting in Nanotechnology and Biotechnology , 2013 .

[9]  Jonas Schreyögg,et al.  The Impact of Network Ties and Resource Input on Research Performance: An Empirical Investigation Among Surgeons in Academic Medical Centers , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[10]  Chih-Hsing Liu,et al.  Impact of Network Position and Knowledge Diversity on Knowledge Creation: The Empirical Setting of Research Communities , 2012 .

[11]  Catherine Beaudry,et al.  Impact of public and private research funding on scientific production: The case of nanotechnology , 2012 .

[12]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Social Networks and Organizations , 2012 .

[13]  Markus Baer Putting Creativity to Work: The Implementation of Creative Ideas in Organizations , 2012 .

[14]  Liang Chen (陈亮),et al.  Larger or Broader: Performance Implications of Size and Diversity of the Knowledge Worker's Egocentric Network ( 更多或更广:知识员工个人中心网络大�?和 多样性对绩效的影�? ) , 2012 .

[15]  Chih-Hsing Liu,et al.  Social relationships and knowledge creation: the mediate of critical network position , 2012 .

[16]  Dovev Lavie,et al.  Collaborating for Knowledge Creation and Application: The Case of Nanotechnology Research Programs , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[17]  Yen-Chih Huang,et al.  Social networks and opportunity recognition: A cultural comparison between Taiwan and the United States , 2011 .

[18]  Ralph A. Heidl,et al.  Knowledge, Networks, and Knowledge Networks: A Review and Research Agenda , 2011 .

[19]  Ralph A. Heidl,et al.  Knowledge, Networks, and Knowledge Networks , 2011 .

[20]  Jay Hyuk Rhee,et al.  How to further exploit social capital: An empirical investigation of three dimensions of social capital and their contributions to individual performance , 2011 .

[21]  Mats Magnusson,et al.  The Impact of Social Capital on Ideation , 2011 .

[22]  Szabolcs Kéri,et al.  Solitary minds and social capital: Latent inhibition, general intellectual functions and social network size predict creative achievements. , 2011 .

[23]  K. Rost The strength of strong ties in the creation of innovation , 2011 .

[24]  Mark Sanders,et al.  Social capital building and new business formation , 2011 .

[25]  Jooho Lee,et al.  Exploring the Role of Social Networks in Affective Organizational Commitment: Network Centrality, Strength of Ties, and Structural Holes , 2011 .

[26]  M. Hammond,et al.  Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. , 2011 .

[27]  P. Ingram,et al.  Bonds and boundaries: Network structure, organizational boundaries, and job performance , 2011 .

[28]  Chih-Hsing Liu,et al.  The effects of innovation alliance on network structure and density of cluster , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[29]  Chien Hsiang Liao,et al.  How to improve research quality? Examining the impacts of collaboration intensity and member diversity in collaboration networks , 2011, Scientometrics.

[30]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology on Academic Scientists' Productivity and Collaboration Patterns , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[31]  Marie Louise Mors Innovation in a global consulting firm: when the problem is too much diversity , 2010 .

[32]  Simon Rodan,et al.  Structural holes and managerial performance: Identifying the underlying mechanisms , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[33]  Markus Baer The strength-of-weak-ties perspective on creativity: a comprehensive examination and extension. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[34]  J. van den Ende,et al.  With a Little Help from Our Colleagues: A Longitudinal Study of Social Networks for Innovation , 2010 .

[35]  Cristóbal Casanueva,et al.  Social capital and individual innovativeness in university research networks , 2010 .

[36]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  Activating Cross-Boundary Knowledge: The Role of Simmelian Ties in the Generation of Innovations , 2010 .

[37]  Chiung-Lin Chiu,et al.  Intranetwork relationships, creativity, knowledge diversification, and network position , 2010 .

[38]  Srikanth Paruchuri,et al.  Intraorganizational Networks, Interorganizational Networks, and the Impact of Central Inventors: A Longitudinal Study of Pharmaceutical Firms , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[39]  Jeongsik Jay Lee,et al.  Heterogeneity, Brokerage and Innovative Performance: Endogenous Formation of Collaborative Inventor Networks , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[40]  Nataša Golubovi,et al.  NETWORK STRUCTURE OF SOCIAL CAPITAL , 2010 .

[41]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Social networks, personal values, and creativity: evidence for curvilinear and interaction effects. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[42]  Aparna Joshi,et al.  The Role Of Context In Work Team Diversity Research: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2009 .

[43]  Matthew Semadeni,et al.  Value of Strong Ties to Disconnected Others: Examining Knowledge Creation in Biomedicine , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[44]  Gerard Delanty The Foundations of Social Theory , 2009 .

[45]  Rajesh Chandy,et al.  Radical Innovation across Nations: The Preeminence of Corporate Culture , 2009 .

[46]  Ute R. Hülsheger,et al.  Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[47]  Alex Maritz,et al.  Networking, entrepreneurship and productivity in universities , 2010 .

[48]  Gino Cattani,et al.  A Core/Periphery Perspective on Individual Creative Performance: Social Networks and Cinematic Achievements in the Hollywood Film Industry , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[49]  David Holman,et al.  Social networkers: Measuring and examining individual differences in propensity to connect with others , 2008, Soc. Networks.

[50]  B. Frey,et al.  Do Rankings Reflect Research Quality? , 2008, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[51]  A. van de Rijt,et al.  Dynamics of Networks if Everyone Strives for Structural Holes1 , 2008, American Journal of Sociology.

[52]  Xiao-Hua Zhou,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta‐Analysis , 2008 .

[53]  Nora Madjar,et al.  Emotional and informational support from different sources and employee creativity , 2008 .

[54]  Christopher Lettl,et al.  A Social Network Perspective of Lead Users and Creativity: An Empirical Study among Children , 2008 .

[55]  Marc H. Anderson Social networks and the cognitive motivation to realize network opportunities: a study of managers' information gathering behaviors , 2008 .

[56]  D. Harrison,et al.  What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. , 2007 .

[57]  L. Fleming,et al.  Collaborative Brokerage, Generative Creativity, and Creative Success , 2007 .

[58]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .

[59]  David M. Waguespack,et al.  Penguins, Camels, and Other Birds of a Feather: Brokerage, Boundary Spanning, and Leadership in Open Innovation Communities , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[60]  Judd Harrison Michael,et al.  Demographic antecedents and performance consequences of structural holes in work teams , 2007 .

[61]  Patricia E. Tweet Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital , 2006 .

[62]  Marguerite Schneider,et al.  Phases of the Adoption of Innovation in Organizations: Effects of Environment, Organization and Top Managers , 2006 .

[63]  J. Perry-Smith Social Yet Creative: The Role Of Social Relationships In Facilitating Individual Creativity , 2006 .

[64]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  The Impact of Academic Patenting on the Rate, Quality and Direction of (Public) Research Output , 2009 .

[65]  Troy A. Anderson In the middle of things : how ego networks and context perceptions influence individual creativity in work groups , 2006 .

[66]  Peter Moran Structural vs. relational embeddedness: social capital and managerial performance , 2005 .

[67]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[68]  David Obstfeld Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation , 2005 .

[69]  Mike W-L Cheung,et al.  Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: a two-stage approach. , 2005, Psychological methods.

[70]  Myong-Hun Chang,et al.  Discovery and Diffusion of Knowledge in an Endogenous Social Network1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[71]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: Possibilities and problems , 2005, Scientometrics.

[72]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[73]  W. C. Carter,et al.  Principles relating social regard to size and density of personal networks, with applications to stigma , 2004, Soc. Networks.

[74]  Lee Sproull,et al.  More Than an Answer: Information Relationships for Actionable Knowledge , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[75]  Andrew Parker,et al.  The Hidden Power of Social Networks: Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations , 2004 .

[76]  Simon Rodan,et al.  More than Network Structure: How Knowledge Heterogeneity Influences Managerial Performance and Innovativeness , 2004 .

[77]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators , 2004 .

[78]  Albert A. Cannella,et al.  Social Capital and Knowledge Creation: Diminishing Returns of the Number and Strength of Exchange Relationships , 2004 .

[79]  S. Jackson,et al.  7 UNDERSTANDING THE DYNAMICS OF DIVERSITY IN DECISION-MAKING TEAMS , 2004 .

[80]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[81]  Jan Kratzer,et al.  Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: a social network perspective , 2003 .

[82]  Robin Teigland,et al.  Integrating Knowledge through Information Trading: Examining the Relationship between Boundary Spanning Communication and Individual Performance , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[83]  M. Frese,et al.  Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance , 2003 .

[84]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Diversity and creativity in work groups: A dynamic perspective on the affective and cognitive processes that link diversity and performance. , 2003 .

[85]  C. Shalley,et al.  The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective , 2003 .

[86]  W. Powell,et al.  Networks and Economic life , 2003 .

[87]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  Implicating trust in the innovation process , 2002 .

[88]  R. Cross,et al.  THE STRENGTH OF WEAK TIES YOU CAN TRUST: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF TRUST IN EFFECTIVE KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER. , 2002 .

[89]  M. West Sparkling Fountains or Stagnant Ponds: An Integrative Model of Creativity and Innovation Implementation in Work Groups , 2002 .

[90]  Simon Rodan,et al.  Innovation and heterogeneous knowledge in managerial contact networks , 2002, J. Knowl. Manag..

[91]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Complexity, Networks and Knowledge Flow , 2002 .

[92]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept , 2002 .

[93]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[94]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams , 2001 .

[95]  Ajay Mehra,et al.  The Social Networks of High and Low Self-Monitors: Implications for Workplace Performance , 2001 .

[96]  Mark S. Mizruchi,et al.  Getting deals done: The use of social networks in bank decision-making , 2001 .

[97]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Fixed Effects vs. Random Effects Meta‐Analysis Models: Implications for Cumulative Research Knowledge , 2000 .

[98]  Kerrie L. Unsworth,et al.  Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas , 2000 .

[99]  S. Shane Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities , 2000 .

[100]  Hugh Louch,et al.  Personal network integration: transitivity and homophily in strong-tie relations , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[101]  G. Ahuja The duality of collaboration : Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages , 2000 .

[102]  Isabelle Bouty Interpersonal and Interaction Influences on Informal Resource Exchanges Between R&D Researchers Across Organizational Boundaries , 2000 .

[103]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  When a Thousand Flowers Bloom: Structural, Collective, and Social Conditions for Innovation in Organization , 2000 .

[104]  Michael Frese,et al.  Helping to improve suggestion systems: predictors of making suggestions in companies , 1999 .

[105]  Mieneke W. H. Weenig,et al.  Communication Networks in the Diffusion of an Innovation in an Organization1 , 1999 .

[106]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[107]  R. Overton,et al.  A comparison of fixed-effects and mixed (random-effects) models for meta-analysis tests of moderator , 1998 .

[108]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[109]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[110]  W. Lyddon Creativity in Context: Update to "The Social Psychology of Creativity" , 1998 .

[111]  J. Reedijk Sense and nonsense of science citation analyses: comments on the monopoly position of ISI and citation inaccuracies. Risks of possible misuse and biased citation and impact data. , 1998 .

[112]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[113]  James N. Baron,et al.  Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace , 1997 .

[114]  Y. Bian Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China , 1997 .

[115]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[116]  G. R. Oldham,et al.  Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work , 1996 .

[117]  William R. Shadish,et al.  Meta-analysis and the exploration of causal mediating processes: A primer of examples, methods, and issues. , 1996 .

[118]  D. Ones,et al.  Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling , 1995 .

[119]  H. Ibarra Race, Opportunity, And Diversity Of Social Circles In Managerial Networks , 1995 .

[120]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[121]  N. Smelser,et al.  Handbook of Economic Sociology , 1994 .

[122]  H. Ibarra NETWORK CENTRALITY, POWER, AND INNOVATION INVOLVEMENT: DETERMINANTS OF TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ROLES , 1993 .

[123]  John F. Padgett,et al.  Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400-1434 , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[124]  D. Krackhardt The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations , 2003 .

[125]  Daniel J. Brass A social network perspective on human resources management , 1992 .

[126]  F. Damanpour Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators , 1991 .

[127]  F. Narin,et al.  Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents , 1991 .

[128]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Inequality in Scientific Performance: Adjustment for Attribution and Journal Impact , 1991 .

[129]  Ellen M. Whitener,et al.  Confusion of confidence intervals and credibility intervals in meta-analysis. , 1990 .

[130]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[131]  M. Trajtenberg A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[132]  M. Mumford,et al.  Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. , 1988 .

[133]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[134]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Meta-Analytic Procedures for Combining Studies With Multiple Effect Sizes , 1986 .

[135]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Central problems in the management of innovation , 1986 .

[136]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[137]  Ingram Olkin,et al.  Estimation of a Single Effect Size: Parametric and Nonparametric Methods , 1985 .

[138]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  Romantic Involvement and Social Network Involvement , 1983 .

[139]  Mark S. Granovetter T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[140]  M. Hallinan,et al.  Structural Effects on Dyadic Change , 1980 .

[141]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[142]  P. Blau Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure , 1978 .

[143]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[144]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[145]  P. Holland,et al.  A Method for Detecting Structure in Sociometric Data , 1970, American Journal of Sociology.

[146]  Y. Morrison presented at the Annual Meeting of the , 1970 .

[147]  D. Campbell Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. , 1960, Psychological review.