The comparison of visual working memory representations with perceptual inputs.

The human visual system can notice differences between memories of previous visual inputs and perceptions of new visual inputs, but the comparison process that detects these differences has not been well characterized. In this study, the authors tested the hypothesis that differences between the memory of a stimulus array and the perception of a new array are detected in a manner that is analogous to the detection of simple features in visual search tasks. That is, just as the presence of a task-relevant feature in visual search can be detected in parallel, triggering a rapid shift of attention to the object containing the feature, the presence of a memory-percept difference along a task-relevant dimension can be detected in parallel, triggering a rapid shift of attention to the changed object. Supporting evidence was obtained in a series of experiments in which manual reaction times, saccadic reaction times, and event-related potential latencies were examined. However, these experiments also showed that a slow, limited-capacity process must occur before the observer can make a manual change detection response.

[1]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence of the Capture of Visual Attention , 2013, J. Cogn. Neurosci..

[2]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  How are visual inputs compared with memory representations in the change-detection paradigm? , 2010 .

[3]  Jeffrey S. Johnson,et al.  The role of attention in the maintenance of feature bindings in visual short-term memory. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Ashleigh M. Richard,et al.  Understanding the function of visual short-term memory: transsaccadic memory, object correspondence, and gaze correction. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  Visual short term memory , 2007, Scholarpedia.

[6]  A. Kingstone,et al.  The time course of attentional and oculomotor capture reveals a common cause. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  G. Woodman,et al.  The time course of consolidation in visual working memory. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Benjamin M. Robinson,et al.  Intact attentional control of working memory encoding in schizophrenia. , 2006, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[9]  R Dell'Acqua,et al.  Spatial attention freezes during the attention blink. , 2006, Psychophysiology.

[10]  Nicolas Robitaille,et al.  Attentional control and capture in the attentional blink paradigm: Evidence from human electrophysiology , 2006 .

[11]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  The Neural Site of Attention Matches the Spatial Scale of Perception , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory , 2005, Nature.

[13]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  Setting up the target template in visual search. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[14]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Change blindness: past, present, and future , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  W. Ma,et al.  A detection theory account of change detection. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[16]  Stephen R Mitroff,et al.  Nothing compares 2 views: Change blindness can occur despite preserved access to the changed information , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[18]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Capacity of Visual Short-Term Memory is Set Both by Visual Information Load and by Number of Objects , 2004, Psychological science.

[19]  J. Theeuwes No Blindness for Things that Do Not Change , 2004, Psychological science.

[20]  G. Woodman,et al.  Dissociations Among Attention, Perception, and Awareness During Object-Substitution Masking , 2003, Psychological science.

[21]  A. Hollingworth Failures of retrieval and comparison constrain change detection in natural scenes. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Geoffrey F Woodman,et al.  Serial deployment of attention during visual search. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Localizing visual discrimination processes in time and space. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Eliot Hazeltine,et al.  Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  John P Spencer,et al.  Prototypes and particulars: geometric and experience-dependent spatial categories. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  Daniel T. Levin,et al.  Evidence for Preserved Representations in Change Blindness , 2002, Consciousness and Cognition.

[27]  E. Awh,et al.  Evidence for Two Components of Object-Based Selection , 2001, Psychological science.

[28]  A. Kok On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[29]  Jennifer M. Glass,et al.  Virtually Perfect Time Sharing in Dual-Task Performance: Uncorking the Central Cognitive Bottleneck , 2001, Psychological science.

[30]  G. Woodman,et al.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  S. Luck,et al.  Neural sources of focused attention in visual search. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  M. Chun,et al.  Organization of visual short-term memory. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  Ronald A. Rensink Visual Search for Change: A Probe into the Nature of Attentional Processing , 2000 .

[34]  Kenneth C. Scott-Brown,et al.  Comparison Blindness , 2000 .

[35]  D. Gentner,et al.  Comparison in the Development of Categories , 1999 .

[36]  J. Henderson,et al.  The Role of Fixation Position in Detecting Scene Changes Across Saccades , 1999 .

[37]  Geoffrey F. Woodman,et al.  Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search , 1999, Nature.

[38]  S. Yantis,et al.  On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  R. Desimone,et al.  Responses of Neurons in Inferior Temporal Cortex during Memory- Guided Visual Search , 1998 .

[40]  R. Dell’Acqua,et al.  The Demonstration of Short-Term Consolidation , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[41]  S. Luck Sources of Dual-Task Interference: Evidence From Human Electrophysiology , 1998 .

[42]  S. Luck,et al.  On the role of selective attention in visual perception. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[44]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[45]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Attentional requirements in a ‘preattentive’ feature search task , 1997, Nature.

[46]  S. Luck,et al.  Bridging the Gap between Monkey Neurophysiology and Human Perception: An Ambiguity Resolution Theory of Visual Selective Attention , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[47]  H. Deubel,et al.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.

[48]  K. Cave,et al.  Spatial Attention in Visual Search for Features and Feature Conjunctions , 1995 .

[49]  B. Dosher,et al.  The role of attention in the programming of saccades , 1995, Vision Research.

[50]  S J Luck,et al.  Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  J. Theeuwes Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[54]  S. Luck,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[55]  J Theeuwes,et al.  Visual selective attention: a theoretical analysis. , 1993, Acta psychologica.

[56]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis (1993). , 1993 .

[57]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference and elementary mental mechanisms , 1993 .

[58]  P. Dixon,et al.  On the nature of the span of apprehension , 1993 .

[59]  H. Pashler,et al.  Saccadic Eye Movements and Dual-Task Interference , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[60]  J. Palmer,et al.  Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[61]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[62]  H Pashler,et al.  Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: distinct attentional mechanisms. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[63]  S J Luck,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for parallel and serial processing during visual search , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[64]  J. Townsend Serial vs. Parallel Processing: Sometimes They Look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and Should) be Distinguished , 1990 .

[65]  Allen Allport,et al.  Visual attention , 1989 .

[66]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[67]  K. Rayner,et al.  Covert visual attention and extrafoveal information use during object identification , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[68]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[69]  A. Treisman Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[70]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Features and objects in visual processing , 1986 .

[71]  B. Farell,et al.  Same-different judgments: a review of current controversies in perceptual comparisons. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[72]  A. Treisman,et al.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[73]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[74]  E. Donchin,et al.  P300 and tracking difficulty: evidence for multiple resources in dual-task performance. , 1980, Psychophysiology.

[75]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[76]  G. McConkie,et al.  Eye movements and integrating information across fixations. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[77]  D. A. Taylor Effect of identity in the multiletter matching task. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[78]  C. C. Wood,et al.  The ɛ-Adjustment Procedure for Repeated-Measures Analyses of Variance , 1976 .

[79]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Visual sameness: a choice time analysis of pattern recognition processes. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[80]  H. Egeth Parallel versus serial processes in multidimensional stimulus discrimination , 1966 .

[81]  W. E. Hick Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1948, Nature.

[82]  Ruben C Gur,et al.  Neurocognition in schizophrenia. , 2010, Current topics in behavioral neurosciences.

[83]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[84]  David E. Irwin,et al.  The role of the saccade target object in the perception of a visually stable world , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[85]  K. Cave The FeatureGate model of visual selection , 1999, Psychological research.

[86]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Integration and accumulation of information across saccadic eye movements. , 1996 .

[87]  S. Luck,et al.  The role of attention in feature detection and conjunction discrimination: an electrophysiological analysis. , 1995, The International journal of neuroscience.

[88]  J. Hoffman,et al.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[89]  R W Remington,et al.  The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[90]  David E. Meyer,et al.  Dual-Task Interference and Elementary Mental Mechanisms , 1993 .

[91]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[92]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[93]  J. Duncan Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[94]  P. Nunez,et al.  Electric fields of the brain , 1981 .

[95]  S. Sternberg Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. , 1969, American scientist.

[96]  U. Neisser VISUAL SEARCH. , 1964, Scientific American.

[97]  M. Manosevitz,et al.  High-Speed Scanning in Human Memory , 2022 .