Orientation-selective adaptation and tilt after-effect from invisible patterns

Exposure to visual patterns of high contrast (for example, gratings formed by alternating white and black bars) creates after-effects in perception. We become temporarily insensitive to faint test patterns that resemble the pre-exposed pattern (such as gratings of the same orientation), and we require more contrast to detect them. Moreover, if the test pattern is slightly tilted relative to the pre-exposed one, this tilt may be perceptually exaggerated: we experience a tilt after-effect. Here we show that these visual after-effects occur even if the pre-exposed grating is too fine to be perceptually resolved. After looking at a very fine grating, so high in spatial frequency that it was perceptually indistinguishable from a uniform field, observers required more contrast to detect a test grating presented at the same orientation than one presented at the orthogonal orientation. They also experienced a tilt after-effect that depended on the relation of the test pattern's tilt to the unseen orientation of the pre-exposed pattern. Because these after-effects are due to changes in orientation-sensitive mechanisms in visual cortex, our observations imply that extremely fine details, even those too fine to be seen, can penetrate the visual system as far as the cortex, where they are represented neurally without conscious awareness.

[1]  J. Gibson,et al.  Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies , 1937 .

[2]  D. Jameson,et al.  Mach bands : quantitative studies on neural networks in the retina , 1966 .

[3]  F. Campbell,et al.  Optical quality of the human eye , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Adaptation to spatial stimuli. , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  M. Coltheart Visual feature-analyzers and after-effects of tilt and curvature. , 1971, Psychological review.

[6]  L. Maffei,et al.  Neural Correlate of Perceptual Adaptation to Gratings , 1973, Science.

[7]  D. Hubel,et al.  Ferrier lecture - Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex , 1977, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[8]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex , 1977 .

[9]  D M Levi,et al.  Humans deprived of normal binocular vision have binocular interactions tuned to size and orientation. , 1979, Science.

[10]  P. Lennie,et al.  Pattern-selective adaptation in visual cortical neurones , 1979, Nature.

[11]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Short test flashes produce large tilt aftereffects , 1984, Vision Research.

[12]  D. Brainard,et al.  Efficiency in detection of isoluminant and isochromatic interference fringes. , 1993, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[13]  R. Reid,et al.  Specificity of monosynaptic connections from thalamus to visual cortex , 1995, Nature.

[14]  C. Koch,et al.  Are we aware of neural activity in primary visual cortex? , 1995, Nature.

[15]  D. Macleod,et al.  Local luminance nonlinearity and receptor aliasing in the detection of high-frequency gratings. , 1996, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[16]  H S Smallman,et al.  Fine grain of the neural representation of human spatial vision , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  J. Movshon,et al.  Pattern adaptation and cross-orientation interactions in the primary visual cortex , 1998, Neuropharmacology.

[18]  P. Lennie,et al.  Fine Structure of Parvocellular Receptive Fields in the Primate Fovea Revealed by Laser Interferometry , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.