A simple method to simulate diurnal courses of PAR absorbed by grassy canopy

Abstract The fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by vegetation (FAPAR) quantifies the efficiency of absorbing PAR by plants. Accurate estimation of diurnal variation of FAPAR however remains a challenge because of the dynamic changes of incident light conditions and its interaction with canopy structure. Based on a field experiment, we characterized the effects of solar zenith angle (SZA) and fraction of diffuse light (fdPAR) on diurnal FAPAR in an alpine wetland on the Tibetan plateau. We found an obvious nonlinear change pattern of FAPAR against SZA with a maximum value of FAPAR at the SZA of about 30°, and opposite responses of FAPAR to fdPAR outside of a SZA range between 21° and 30°. A curve fitting (CF) method was proposed to estimate diurnal FAPAR in a rapid and accurate way. The CF method accounting for the interactions of SZA and fdPAR on FAPAR can successfully describe the diurnal dynamics of FAPAR under clear and cloudy sky conditions. The estimation deviation of daily FAPAR was only −0.28% for a period of about eight days with various sky conditions. The new method requires only very simple field measurements, but has higher accuracy than the widely-used light penetration model, which is expected to be widely used in grassy vegetations.

[1]  Michele Meroni,et al.  Evaluation of Agreement Between Space Remote Sensing SPOT-VEGETATION fAPAR Time Series , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  Y. Knyazikhin,et al.  Effect of foliage spatial heterogeneity in the MODIS LAI and FPAR algorithm over broadleaf forests , 2003 .

[3]  Robert W. Pearcy,et al.  Sunfleck dynamics in relation to canopy structure in a soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) canopy , 1990 .

[4]  J. Wilson,et al.  ANALYSIS OF THE SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF FOLIAGE BY TWO‐DIMENSIONAL POINT QUADRATS , 1959 .

[5]  Hideki Kobayashi,et al.  A coupled 1-D atmosphere and 3-D canopy radiative transfer model for canopy reflectance, light environment, and photosynthesis simulation in a heterogeneous landscape , 2008 .

[6]  F. Baret,et al.  LAI and fAPAR CYCLOPES global products derived from VEGETATION. Part 2: validation and comparison with MODIS collection 4 products , 2007 .

[7]  S. Running,et al.  Global Terrestrial Gross and Net Primary Productivity from the Earth Observing System , 2000 .

[8]  R. Giering,et al.  Consistent assimilation of MERIS FAPAR and atmospheric CO2 into a terrestrial vegetation model and interactive mission benefit analysis , 2011 .

[9]  Danny Lo Seen,et al.  PAR extinction in shortgrass ecosystems: effects of clumping, sky conditions and soil albedo , 2000 .

[10]  S. Nilsson,et al.  Comparison of four global FAPAR datasets over Northern Eurasia for the year 2000 , 2010 .

[11]  Carlos M. Duarte,et al.  Depth-acclimation of photosynthesis, morphology and demography of Posidonia oceanica and Cymodocea nodosa in the Spanish Mediterranean Sea , 2002 .

[12]  P. Alton.  Reduced carbon sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems under overcast skies compared to clear skies , 2008 .

[13]  Margaret C. Anderson.  Stand Structure and Light Penetration. II. A Theoretical Analysis , 1966 .

[14]  Jean-Luc Widlowski,et al.  On the bias of instantaneous FAPAR estimates in open-canopy forests. , 2010 .

[15]  Jin Chen,et al.  Diurnal and seasonal variations in light-use efficiency in an alpine meadow ecosystem: causes and implications for remote sensing , 2009 .

[16]  Agnès Bégué,et al.  Modeling hemispherical and directional radiative fluxes in regular-clumped canopies , 1992 .

[17]  C. S. T. Daughtry,et al.  Techniques for Measuring Intercepted and Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation in Corn Canopies1 , 1986 .

[18]  O. Hagolle,et al.  LAI, fAPAR and fCover CYCLOPES global products derived from VEGETATION: Part 1: Principles of the algorithm , 2007 .

[19]  A. Bégué,et al.  A method to estimate instantaneous and daily intercepted photosynthetically active radiation using a hemispherical sensor , 1995 .

[20]  J. Norman,et al.  Instrument for Indirect Measurement of Canopy Architecture , 1991 .

[21]  Michael L. Roderick,et al.  Pinatubo, Diffuse Light, and the Carbon Cycle , 2003, Science.

[22]  A. Lang,et al.  Leaf area and average leaf angle from transmission of direct sunlight , 1986 .

[23]  Ranga B. Myneni,et al.  Analysis of leaf area index and fraction of PAR absorbed by vegetation products from the terra MODIS sensor: 2000-2005 , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[24]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Methods in Ecosystem Science , 2000, Springer New York.

[25]  N. Gobron,et al.  Monitoring the photosynthetic activity of vegetation from remote sensing data , 2006 .

[26]  S. Enríquez,et al.  Form-function analysis of the effect of canopy morphology on leaf self-shading in the seagrass Thalassia testudinum , 2005, Oecologia.

[27]  T. A. Black,et al.  Responses of net ecosystem exchanges of carbon dioxide to changes in cloudiness: Results from two North American deciduous forests , 1999 .

[28]  D. Randall,et al.  A Revised Land Surface Parameterization (SiB2) for Atmospheric GCMS. Part I: Model Formulation , 1996 .

[29]  Jean-Pierre Wigneron,et al.  Effects of canopy architectural parameterizations on the modeling of radiative transfer mechanism , 2013 .

[30]  T. Nilson.  A theoretical analysis of the frequency of gaps in plant stands , 1971 .

[31]  T. A. Black,et al.  Can a satellite-derived estimate of the fraction of PAR absorbed by chlorophyll (FAPARchl) improve predictions of light-use efficiency and ecosystem photosynthesis for a boreal aspen forest? , 2009 .

[32]  S. Goward,et al.  Vegetation canopy PAR absorptance and the normalized difference vegetation index - An assessment using the SAIL model , 1992 .

[33]  M. Lechowicz,et al.  Optimal photosynthetic use of light by tropical tree crowns achieved by adjustment of individual leaf angles and nitrogen content. , 2009, Annals of botany.

[34]  S. Running,et al.  Synergistic algorithm for estimating vegetation canopy leaf area index and fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active , 1998 .

[35]  G. Campbell.  Extinction coefficients for radiation in plant canopies calculated using an ellipsoidal inclination angle distribution , 1986 .

[36]  J. Monteith.  SOLAR RADIATION AND PRODUCTIVITY IN TROPICAL ECOSYSTEMS , 1972 .

[37]  Dennis D. Baldocchi,et al.  Response of a Deciduous Forest to the Mount Pinatubo Eruption: Enhanced Photosynthesis , 2003, Science.

[38]  S. T. Gower,et al.  Direct and Indirect Estimation of Leaf Area Index, fAPAR, and Net Primary Production of Terrestrial Ecosystems , 1999 .

[39]  J. Wilson,et al.  INCLINED POINT QUADRATS , 1960 .

[40]  P. Stenberg,et al.  Analysis of the sensitivity of absorbed light and incident light profile to various canopy architecture and stand conditions. , 2011, Tree physiology.

[41]  William E. Reifsnyder,et al.  Spatial and temporal distribution of solar radiation beneath forest canopies , 1970 .