Image features of true positive and false negative cancers in screening mammograms

The location, tissue background and imaging characteristics of true positive and false negative screens of breast cancers have been studied. This data can aid decisions in optimizing the display of mammographic information with the objective of minimizing false negative screens. Screening mammograms for four groups of women were digitized; those with screen detected cancers, those with false negative interval cancers, and matched normals for both groups. The optical density (OD) distribution in the main breast region of each mammogram was determined. The OD in three regions of interest around the cancers was also measured. Cancer locations were mapped and warped onto a typical image to show their spatial distribution. Where a cancer was detectable by calcifications alone it had a relatively low probability of being a false negative interval cancer. The mean OD differences between the cancer and the cancer background region (excluding calcifications) were approximately a factor of two lower in dense breasts compared with other breast types. Poorly defined masses that became interval cancers had mean OD differences that were approximately a factor of 0.1 OD lower than those that were detectable by screening. 22% of false negative cancers were located near the chest wall edge of the mammograms compared with 10% of the true positives. The results indicate the importance of effectively displaying information in the lighter areas of the mammogram, corresponding to glandular tissues, with sufficient contrast for suspicious mammographic details to be detected. Where the mean OD differences between the cancer and its background region are low, as measured for some poorly defined masses, there is an increased risk of a false negative interval cancer. Particular attention should be given to the chest wall area of the film, especially in the lower retroglandular region, during routine screening.

[1]  L J Yeoman,et al.  Screening interval breast cancers: mammographic features and prognosis factors. , 1996, Radiology.

[2]  S. Wall,et al.  Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials , 1993, The Lancet.

[3]  B. Threatt,et al.  Tumor location and detectability in mammographic screening. , 1982, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  John C. Russ,et al.  The Image Processing Handbook , 2016, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[5]  R. Bird,et al.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. , 1992, Radiology.

[6]  A. Threlfall,et al.  Is the three year breast screening interval too long? Occurrence of interval cancers in NHS breast screening programme's north western region , 1995, BMJ.

[7]  P. Forrest,et al.  Breast cancer screening : report to the Health Ministers of England, Wales, Scotland & Northern Ireland , 1986 .

[8]  Geographical distribution of breast cancers on the mammogram: an interval cancer database. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  B Sahiner,et al.  A regional registration technique for automated interval change analysis of breast lesions on mammograms. , 1999, Medical physics.

[10]  S Meeson,et al.  Skin edge perception in mammograms: a comparison of two film-screen combinations. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[11]  B. Viták,et al.  Tumour characteristics and survival in patients with invasive interval breast cancer classified according to mammographic findings at the latest screening: a comparison of true interval and missed interval cancers , 1999, European Radiology.

[12]  C. Camilleri-Ferrante,et al.  Monitoring Interval Cancers in Breast Screening Programmes: The East Anglian Experience , 1995, Journal of medical screening.

[13]  R. Blanks,et al.  Effect of NHS breast screening programme on mortality from breast cancer in England and Wales, 1990-8: comparison of observed with predicted mortality , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  False-negative breast screening assessment: what lessons can we learn? , 2001, Clinical radiology.

[15]  P. Porter,et al.  Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[16]  M. Wallis,et al.  Analysis of optical density and contrast in mammograms. , 1999, The British journal of radiology.

[17]  Susan M. Astley,et al.  Sites of Occurrence of Malignancies in Mammograms , 1998, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[18]  John C. Russ,et al.  The image processing handbook (3. ed.) , 1995 .