Risk Factors of Building Apartments for University Talent through the Agent Construction Mode in China: Interrelationship and Prioritization

Apartments for university talent (AUT), are apartments provided to staff at non-market price, in order to attract outstanding scholars from around the world to work in universities and improve educational quality. This has been a critical issue in achieving social sustainability in China during rapid urbanization and industrialization. The agent construction mode has been adopted to build AUT because universities usually lack relevant management experience. The agent construction mode is a type of turnkey engineer construction based on the principal-agent model, project bidding mode, engineering contracting projects, and project supervision system. Risk factors are important considerations for both universities and agent construction companies. Although some studies have investigated the risk factors, only a few studies have identified the hierarchical structure of relevant risk factors. Therefore, the interrelationship and prioritization of the risk factors remain unknown, and this situation presents a barrier to better risk management. This paper investigates the interrelationship of risk factors with interpretative structural modeling (ISM). In addition, fuzzy MICMAC (matric d’impacts croises-multiplication applique a un classemen) analysis was conducted to prioritize the risk factors. The findings provide useful references for better risk management of building AUT through the agent construction mode. Although this study focuses on China, the analytical process can also be generalized to other research topics and other countries.

[1]  Shaligram Pokharel,et al.  A hybrid approach using ISM and fuzzy TOPSIS for the selection of reverse logistics provider , 2009 .

[2]  V. Venkatesh,et al.  Analysis on supply chain risks in Indian apparel retail chains and proposal of risk prioritization model using Interpretive structural modeling , 2015 .

[3]  Wang Hongdi,et al.  Procurement innovation for public construction projects: A study of agent-construction system and public-private partnership in China , 2013 .

[4]  Xiang Jian-pin Risk Assessment of Multi-Project Management under Agent Construction System Management Mode , 2014 .

[5]  Richard H. Watson,et al.  Interpretive structural modeling—A useful tool for technology assessment? , 1978 .

[6]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  An Alternative Model to Determine the Financing Structure of PPP-Based Young Graduate Apartments in China: A Case Study of Hangzhou , 2015 .

[7]  Xiaoling Zhang,et al.  An alternative model for evaluating sustainable urbanization , 2012 .

[8]  R. Shankar,et al.  Productivity improvement of a computer hardware supply chain , 2005 .

[9]  Yan Song,et al.  Development priority zoning (DPZ)-led scenario simulation for regional land use change: The case of Suichang County, China , 2012 .

[10]  Yujie Lu,et al.  Hierarchical structuring success factors of project stakeholder management in the construction organization , 2011 .

[11]  Qiping Shen,et al.  A generic decision model for developing concentrated rural settlement in post-disaster reconstruction: a China study , 2014, Natural Hazards.

[12]  Shun-Chieh Hsieh,et al.  Analyzing urbanization data using rural-urban interaction model and logistic growth model , 2014, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[13]  Kamal M. Al‐Subhi Al‐Harbi Sharing fractions in cost-plus-incentive-fee contracts , 1998 .

[14]  S. Deshmukh,et al.  Vendor Selection Using Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) , 1994 .

[15]  Shivraj Kanungo,et al.  A structured model for evaluating information systems effectiveness , 1999 .

[16]  Chen-Yu Chang Principal-Agent Model of Risk Allocation in Construction Contracts and Its Critique , 2014 .

[17]  D. Winterfeldt Structuring decision problems for decision analysis , 1980 .

[18]  Weisheng Lu,et al.  Critical Assessment Indicators for Measuring Benefits of Rural Infrastructure Investment in China , 2011 .

[19]  X. Ai,et al.  System structure identification by analyzing elements behavior sequences with GRA-based ISM , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Grey Systems and Intelligent Services (GSIS 2009).

[20]  K. C. Iyer,et al.  Hierarchical Structuring of PPP Risks Using Interpretative Structural Modeling , 2010 .

[21]  R. Flood Six scenarios for the future of systems “problem solving” , 1989 .