Diffusion anisotropy indexes are sensitive to selecting the EPI readout-encoding bandwidth at high-field MRI.

Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging (DT-MRI) is generally performed using an echo planar imaging (EPI) acquisition to map directional water diffusion. However, the oscillating magnetic field gradients of the EPI acquisition can result in considerable mechanical vibrations, which lead, in turn, to magnetic field fluctuations causing Nyquist ghosting in the EPI data. The objective of this study was to investigate effects of EPI readout gradient modulation frequency, which is directly associated with the EPI readout bandwidth (BW), on the accuracy of DT-MRI measurements in a high magnetic field system. A spherical water phantom was used to study the relationship between the EPI BW and the Nyquist ghost for a spin-echo EPI acquisition with a matrix size of 128x128, complemented by diffusion sensitization gradients of up to b=800 s/mm(2) along six directions for DT-MRI. Nine volunteers (four males and five females) were studied using EPI at different BW acquisitions. Analysis of variance was used to investigate the EPI BW effects. The phantom studies demonstrated a systematic relationship between BWs and the intensities of Nyquist ghosts. In the human brain studies, EPI BW variations substantially corrupted diffusion anisotropy indexes (i.e., fractional anisotropy and relative anisotropy) (F=10.5, P=.0001) but were unrelated to diffusion-encoding directions (F=0.14, P=.98). It was possible to minimize BW dependence (F=1.48, P=.25) by tuning the modulation frequency of the EPI readout gradient. In conclusion, diffusion anisotropic indexes are sensitive to the readout BW of EPI due to associated Nyquist ghosting. However, the effect can be minimized by tuning the modulation frequency of the EPI readout gradient, that is, the EPI BW, to a range outside the harmonics of mechanical gradient vibrations.

[1]  Joseph S. Gati,et al.  Acoustic noise reduction in a 4 T MRI scanner , 2001, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[2]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  Diffusion‐tensor MRI: theory, experimental design and data analysis – a technical review , 2002 .

[3]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Artifacts and pitfalls in diffusion MRI , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  H Bruder,et al.  Image reconstruction for echo planar imaging with nonequidistant k‐space sampling , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  D G Gadian,et al.  The effect of residual Nyquist ghost in quantitative echo‐planar diffusion imaging , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Chris K. Mechefske,et al.  Acoustic analysis of a gradient coil winding in an MRI scanner , 2005 .

[7]  C. Pierpaoli,et al.  Characterization of and correction for eddy current artifacts in echo planar diffusion imaging , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  M A Horsfield,et al.  Mapping eddy current induced fields for the correction of diffusion-weighted echo planar images. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[9]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  C. K. Mechefske,et al.  Characterization of vibration and acoustic noise in a gradient-coil insert , 2004, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[11]  R I Kitney,et al.  Investigation of acoustic noise on 15 MRI scanners from 0.2 T to 3 T , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  Hangyi Jiang,et al.  DtiStudio: Resource program for diffusion tensor computation and fiber bundle tracking , 2006, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[13]  D. Tank,et al.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  P. Jezzard,et al.  Correction for geometric distortion in echo planar images from B0 field variations , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  M A Bernstein,et al.  Concomitant magnetic‐field‐induced artifacts in axial echo planar imaging , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  F Schick,et al.  Echoplanar diffusion tensor imaging of the lower leg musculature using eddy current nulled stimulated echo preparation , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  L Bolinger,et al.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of human brain perfusion at 1.5 T using steady-state inversion of arterial water. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  V. Wedeen,et al.  Reduction of eddy‐current‐induced distortion in diffusion MRI using a twice‐refocused spin echo , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  Dongrong Xu,et al.  Correction of eddy‐current distortions in diffusion tensor images using the known directions and strengths of diffusion gradients , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  Jason Berwick,et al.  k‐space correction of eddy‐current‐induced distortions in diffusion‐weighted echo‐planar imaging , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  D. Tomasi,et al.  Echo planar imaging at 4 tesla with minimum acoustic noise , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[22]  Ioannis Delakis,et al.  MRI receiver frequency response as a contributor to Nyquist ghosting in echo planar imaging , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.