A Biomechanical Comparison of Three Different Posterior Fixation Constructs Used for C6–C7 Cervical Spine Immobilization: A Finite Element Study

The intralaminar screw construct has been recently introduced in C6–C7 fixation. The aim of the study is to compare the stability afforded by three different C7 posterior fixation techniques using a three-dimensional finite element model of a C6–C7 cervical spine motion segment. Finite element models representing three different cervical anchor types (C7 intralaminar screw, C7 lateral mass screw, and C7 pedicle screw) were developed. Range of motion (ROM) and maximum von Mises stresses in the vertebra for the three screw techniques were compared under pure moments in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. ROM for pedicle screw construct was less than the lateral mass screw construct and intralaminar screw construct in the three principal directions. The maximum von Misses stress was observed in the C7 vertebra around the pedicle in all the three screw constructs. Maximum von Mises stress in pedicle screw construct was less than the lateral mass screw construct and intralaminar screw construct in all loading modes. This study demonstrated that the pedicle screw fixation is the strongest instrumentation method for C6–C7 fixation. Pedicle screw fixation resulted in least stresses around the C7 pedicle-vertebral body complex. However, if pedicle fixation is not favorable, the laminar screw can be a better option compared to the lateral mass screw because the stress around the pedicle-vertebral body complex and ROM predicted for laminar screw construct was smaller than those of lateral mass screw construct.

[1]  F. Gebhard,et al.  Fehlerquellen und Gefahren der CT-basierten Navigation , 2014, Der Orthopäde.

[2]  R. Bale,et al.  Comparison of two novel fluoroscopy-based stereotactic methods for cervical pedicle screw placement and review of the literature , 2008, European Spine Journal.

[3]  B. Son,et al.  C7 posterior fixation using intralaminar screws : early clinical and radiographic outcome. , 2010, Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.

[4]  N. Wright.  Posterior C2 Fixation Using Bilateral, Crossing C2 Laminar Screws: Case Series and Technical Note , 2004, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[5]  P. Mertens,et al.  Transpedicular screwing of the seventh cervical vertebra: anatomical considerations and surgical technique , 2003, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[6]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Finite element modeling approaches of human cervical spine facet joint capsule. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  R. Yeasting,et al.  Anatomic relation between the cervical pedicle and the adjacent neural structures. , 1997, Spine.

[8]  James D. Kang,et al.  Validation of a Noninvasive Technique to Precisely Measure In Vivo Three-Dimensional Cervical Spine Movement , 2011, Spine.

[9]  M. Reinhold,et al.  Cervical pedicle screw placement: feasibility and accuracy of two new insertion techniques based on morphometric data , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[10]  K. Kaneda,et al.  Surgical Treatment of Cervical Destructive Spondyloarthropathy (DSA) , 2000, Spine.

[11]  K. An,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Posterior Screw Fixation in Cadaveric Cervical Spines , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Poroelastic creep response analysis of a lumbar motion segment in compression. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  M Nissan,et al.  The cervical and lumbar vertebrae--an anthropometric model. , 1984, Engineering in medicine.

[14]  E. Schneider,et al.  Biomechanical Analysis of Transpedicular Screw Fixation in the Subaxial Cervical Spine , 2004, Spine.

[15]  Vijay K. Goel,et al.  Impact Response of the Intervertebral Disc in a Finite-Element Model , 2000, Spine.

[16]  H. An,et al.  Biomechanical Comparison of Three Different Types of C7 Fixation Techniques , 2011, Spine.

[17]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Quantitative anatomy of cervical spine ligaments. Part II. Middle and lower cervical spine. , 1991, Journal of spinal disorders.

[18]  A. Vasavada,et al.  Head and neck anthropometry, vertebral geometry and neck strength in height-matched men and women. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  Sang Woo Kim,et al.  Anatomical Variations of the Vertebral Artery Segment in the Lower Cervical Spine: Analysis by Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Angiography , 2008, Spine.

[20]  V. Braun,et al.  Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion in the cervical spine for internal fixation using frameless stereotactic guidance. , 2008, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[21]  W. Hutton,et al.  A Comparison of Pedicle and Lateral Mass Screw Construct Stiffnesses at the Cervicothoracic Junction: A Biomechanical Study , 2005, Spine.

[22]  Michael Y. Wang.  CERVICAL CROSSING LAMINAR SCREWS: EARLY CLINICAL RESULTS AND COMPLICATIONS , 2007, Neurosurgery.

[23]  Jong Tae Kim,et al.  Clinical and radiologic outcome of laminar screw at C2 and C7 for posterior instrumentation--review of 25 cases and comparison of C2 and C7 intralaminar screw fixation. , 2010, World neurosurgery.

[24]  W. Whitehead,et al.  Translaminar screw fixation in the subaxial pediatric cervical spine. , 2008, Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics.

[25]  E. Teo,et al.  Evaluation of the role of ligaments, facets and disc nucleus in lower cervical spine under compression and sagittal moments using finite element method. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[26]  R. Gaines,et al.  Accuracy of Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement Using the Funnel Technique , 2001, Spine.

[27]  Relative contributions of strain-dependent permeability and fixed charged density of proteoglycans in predicting cervical disc biomechanics: a poroelastic C5-C6 finite element model study. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[28]  R. Yeasting,et al.  Anatomic study of the cervicothoracic spinal nerves and their relation to the pedicles. , 2000, American journal of orthopedics.

[29]  P. Hudgins,et al.  The Accuracy of Computed Tomography in Assessing Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement , 2003, Spine.

[30]  V. Goel,et al.  Uncinate processes and Luschka joints influence the biomechanics of the cervical spine: Quantification using a finite element model of the C5‐C6 segment , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[31]  M. Adams,et al.  The internal mechanical properties of cervical intervertebral discs as revealed by stress profilometry , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[32]  R. Yeasting,et al.  Anatomic Consideration of Transpedicular Screw Placement in the Cervical Spine: An Analysis of Two Approaches , 1996, Spine.

[33]  C. Mazel,et al.  Posterior Cervicothoracic Instrumentation in Spine Tumors , 2004, Spine.

[34]  L Kinzl,et al.  [Sources of error and risks in CT based navigation]. , 2002, Der Orthopade.

[35]  Kevin T Foley,et al.  Percutaneous Placement of Posterior Cervical Screws Using Three-Dimensional Fluoroscopy , 2006, Spine.

[36]  R. Yeasting,et al.  Anatomic relation between the cervical pedicle and the adjacent neural structures. , 1997, Spine.

[37]  J. Cusick,et al.  Morphology of young and old cervical spine intervertebral disc tissues. , 2000, Biomedical sciences instrumentation.

[38]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Geometric and mechanical properties of human cervical spine ligaments. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[39]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Cervical Human Vertebrae Quantitative Three‐Dimensional Anatomy of the Middle and Lower Regions , 1991, Spine.

[40]  L. Claes,et al.  Effect of constrained posterior screw and rod systems for primary stability: Biomechanical in vitro comparison of various instrumentations in a single-level corpectomy model , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[41]  Z. Gokaslan,et al.  Translaminar screw fixation in the upper thoracic spine. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[42]  Frederick L. Stephens,et al.  Using lamina screws as a salvage technique at C-7: computed tomography and biomechanical analysis using cadaveric vertebrae. Laboratory investigation. , 2009, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[43]  N. Crawford,et al.  Biomechanical Analysis of Rigid Stabilization Techniques for Three-Column Injury in the Lower Cervical Spine , 2005, Spine.

[44]  B. Son,et al.  Significance of Laminar Screw Fixation in the Subaxial Cervical Spine , 2008, Spine.

[45]  J. Heller.  Cervical pedicle screw insertion: assessment of safety and accuracy with computer-assisted image guidance. , 2000, Journal of spinal disorders.

[46]  E. Lautenschlager,et al.  Cervical pedicle screws vs. lateral mass screws: uniplanar fatigue analysis and residual pullout strengths. , 2006, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.