Feature instructions improve face-matching accuracy

Identity comparisons of photographs of unfamiliar faces are prone to error but important for applied settings, such as person identification at passport control. Finding techniques to improve face-matching accuracy is therefore an important contemporary research topic. This study investigated whether matching accuracy can be improved by instruction to attend to specific facial features. Experiment 1 showed that instruction to attend to the eyebrows enhanced matching accuracy for optimized same-day same-race face pairs but not for other-race faces. By contrast, accuracy was unaffected by instruction to attend to the eyes, and declined with instruction to attend to ears. Experiment 2 replicated the eyebrow-instruction improvement with a different set of same-race faces, comprising both optimized same-day and more challenging different-day face pairs. These findings suggest that instruction to attend to specific features can enhance face-matching accuracy, but feature selection is crucial and generalization across face sets may be limited.

[1]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[2]  Markus Bindemann,et al.  Revisiting the Processing of Internal and External Features of Unfamiliar Faces: The Headscarf Effect , 2009, Perception.

[3]  Peter Hills,et al.  Removing the own-race bias in face recognition by attentional shift using fixation crosses to diagnostic features: An eye-tracking study , 2013 .

[4]  Ahmed M. Megreya,et al.  Matching Face Images Taken on the Same Day or Months Apart: the Limitations of Photo ID , 2013 .

[5]  Allison B Sekuler,et al.  Holistic Processing Is Not Correlated With Face-Identification Accuracy , 2010, Psychological science.

[6]  Ahmed M. Megreya,et al.  Hits and false positives in face matching: A familiarity-based dissociation , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  David J. Robertson,et al.  From policing to passport control: the limitations of photo ID , 2015 .

[8]  Rob Jenkins,et al.  Unfamiliar Face Perception , 2011 .

[9]  Naphtali Abudarham,et al.  Reverse engineering the face space: Discovering the critical features for face identification. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[10]  Rob Jenkins,et al.  A familiarity disadvantage for remembering specific images of faces. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  P. Hancock,et al.  Robust representations for face recognition: The power of averages , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  Markus Bindemann,et al.  Me, Myself, and I: Different Recognition Rates for Three Photo-IDs of the Same Person , 2011, Perception.

[13]  A. Burton,et al.  Unfamiliar face matching: Pairs out-perform individuals and provide a route to training. , 2015, British journal of psychology.

[14]  V. Bruce,et al.  Recognition of unfamiliar faces , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  A. Burton,et al.  Redesigning photo-ID to improve unfamiliar face matching performance. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[16]  A. Burton,et al.  Crowd Effects in Unfamiliar Face Matching , 2013 .

[17]  Markus Bindemann,et al.  Finding needles in haystacks: identity mismatch frequency and facial identity verification. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[18]  Kay Ritchie,et al.  Learning faces from variability , 2015, Journal of vision.

[19]  Paul Miller,et al.  Verification of face identities from images captured on video. , 1999 .

[20]  P. Sinha,et al.  The Role of Eyebrows in Face Recognition , 2003, Perception.

[21]  Ahmed M Megreya,et al.  Matching faces to photographs: poor performance in eyewitness memory (without the memory). , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[22]  G. Pike,et al.  When Seeing should not be Believing: Photographs, Credit Cards and Fraud , 1997 .

[23]  Rob Jenkins,et al.  Identity From Variation: Representations of Faces Derived From Multiple Instances , 2016, Cogn. Sci..

[24]  Markus Bindemann,et al.  Forensic face matching : A review , 2017 .

[25]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Same-race faces are perceived more holistically than other-race faces , 2004 .

[26]  Ahmed M. Megreya,et al.  Unfamiliar faces are not faces: Evidence from a matching task , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[27]  David White,et al.  Evaluating the Feature Comparison Strategy for Forensic Face Identification , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[28]  Markus Bindemann.  Face processing: Systems, Disorders and Cultural Differences , 2017 .

[29]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Oxford Handbook of Face Perception , 2011 .

[30]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Same-race faces are perceived more holistically than other-race faces , 2006 .

[31]  Andrew J. Edmonds,et al.  EVIDENCE FOR DIFFERENT REPRESENTATIONS OF FAMILIAR AND UNFAMILIAR FACES , 2009 .

[32]  S. Andrews,et al.  Telling faces together: Learning new faces through exposure to multiple instances , 2015, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[33]  David White,et al.  Variation in Photos of the Same Face Drives Improvements in Identity Verification , 2015, Perception.

[34]  A. Burton,et al.  Variability in photos of the same face , 2011, Cognition.

[35]  David White,et al.  Feedback training for facial image comparison , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  A. Burton,et al.  Passport Officers’ Errors in Face Matching , 2014, PloS one.

[37]  Markus Bindemann,et al.  The Effect of Feedback on Face‐Matching Accuracy , 2013 .

[38]  A. Mike Burton,et al.  Why has research in face recognition progressed so slowly? : The importance of variability , 2013 .

[39]  P. Schyns,et al.  Show Me the Features! Understanding Recognition From the Use of Visual Information , 2002, Psychological science.

[40]  A. Burton,et al.  The Glasgow Face Matching Test , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[41]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Holistic Processing Is Finely Tuned for Faces of One's Own Race , 2006, Psychological science.

[42]  Peter J. Hills,et al.  Eye-tracking the own-race bias in face recognition: Revealing the perceptual and socio-cognitive mechanisms , 2013, Cognition.

[43]  J. Brigham,et al.  Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review , 2001 .

[44]  G Tiberghien,et al.  Encoding activity and face recognition. , 1997, Memory.

[45]  Arun Ross,et al.  A survey on ear biometrics , 2013, CSUR.

[46]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: evidence from a cross-cultural study , 2004, Cognition.

[47]  Ahmed M. Megreya,et al.  The Other-Race Effect does not Rely on Memory: Evidence from a Matching Task , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[48]  Claus-Christian Carbon,et al.  An Easy Game for Frauds? Effects of Professional Experience and Time Pressure on Passport-Matching Performance , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.