Design for a working memory.

Starting from the premise that working memory is a system for providing access to representations for complex cognition, six requirements for a working memory system are delineated: (1) maintaining structural representations by dynamic bindings, (2) manipulating structural representations, (3) flexible reconfiguration, (4) partial decoupling from long-term memory, (5) controlled retrieval from long-term memory, and (6) encoding of new structures into longterm memory. The chapter proposes an architecture for a system that meets these requirements. The working memory system consists of a declarative and a procedural part, each of which has three embedded components: the activated part of long-term memory, a component for creating new structural representations by dynamic bindings (the ‘‘region of direct access’’ for declarative working memory, and the ‘‘bridge’’ for procedural working memory), and a mechanism for selecting a single element (‘‘focus of attention’’ for declarative working memory, and ‘‘response focus’’ for procedural working memory). The architecture affords two modes of information processing, an analytical and an associative mode. This distinction provides a theoretically founded formulation of a dual-process theory of reasoning.

[1]  Walter Schaeken,et al.  Inference suppression and semantic memory retrieval: Every counterexample counts , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[2]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Automatic processing of psychological distance: evidence from a Stroop task. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  Henry Markovits,et al.  The Effect of Instructions and Information Retrieval on Accepting the Premises in a Conditional Reasoning Task , 1999 .

[4]  Marci S. DeCaro,et al.  Individual differences in category learning: Sometimes less working memory capacity is better than more , 2008, Cognition.

[5]  Stefanie Schuch,et al.  The costs of changing the representation of action: response repetition and response-response compatibility in dual tasks. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  David F. Lohman,et al.  The complexity continuum in the radex and hierarchical models of intelligence , 1983 .

[7]  D. Hebb Distinctive features of learning in the higher animal , 1961 .

[8]  K. Oberauer Removing irrelevant information from working memory: a cognitive aging study with the modified Sternberg task. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  R. Kliegl,et al.  Age differences in dual-task performance after practice. , 2007, Psychology and aging.

[10]  Ulrich Mayr,et al.  On the role of verbalization during task set selection: Switching or serial order control? , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[11]  A. Miyake,et al.  Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Variation in working memory , 2008 .

[13]  David B Mitchell,et al.  Nonconscious Priming After 17 Years , 2006, Psychological science.

[14]  Jonathan Evans Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[15]  N. Meiran,et al.  On the origins of the task mixing cost in the cuing task-switching paradigm. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  M Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  The Effects of Divided Attention on Encoding and Retrieval Processes: The Resiliency of Retrieval Processes , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[17]  D. Schacter,et al.  Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  Daniel Durstewitz,et al.  The computational role of dopamine D1 receptors in working memory , 2002, Neural Networks.

[19]  H Pashler,et al.  Attentional limits in memory retrieval. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  R. D. Gordon,et al.  Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. , 2001, Psychological review.

[21]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  A formal model of capacity limits in working memory , 2006 .

[22]  S. Lewandowsky,et al.  An endogenous distributed model of ordering in serial recall , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Time course of item and associative information: implications for global memory models. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  A. Miyake,et al.  The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  The Roles of Similarity in Transfer: Separating Retrievability From Inferential Soundness , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  S. Lewandowsky Redintegration and Response Suppression in Serial Recall: A Dynamic Network Model , 1999 .

[27]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Dual-task effects in working memory: Interference between two processing tasks, between two memory demands, and between storage and processing , 2006 .

[29]  U. Lindenberger,et al.  Age-Related Changes in Task-Switching Components: The Role of Task Uncertainty , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[30]  Wim De Neys,et al.  Dual Processing in Reasoning , 2006, Psychological science.

[31]  J. S. Nairne A feature model of immediate memory , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[32]  K. Holyoak,et al.  A symbolic-connectionist theory of relational inference and generalization. , 2003, Psychological review.

[33]  Darryl W. Schneider,et al.  Retrieving information from a hierarchical plan. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  K. Dunbar,et al.  How analogies are generated: The roles of structural and superficial similarity , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[35]  Donald Laming,et al.  Information theory of choice-reaction times , 1968 .

[36]  Lauren M. Bylsma,et al.  Regularization in short-term memory for serial order. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  Christopher A Was,et al.  Available but unattended conceptual information in working memory: temporarily active semantic content or persistent memory for prior operations? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[38]  V. Sloutsky,et al.  What's behind different kinds of kinds: effects of statistical density on learning and representation of categories. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[39]  H L Roediger,et al.  Implicit memory. Retention without remembering. , 1990, The American psychologist.

[40]  M. B. Edwards,et al.  Comparison of the retrieval of item versus spatial position information , 1997 .

[41]  P. Goldman-Rakic Architecture of the Prefrontal Cortex and the Central Executive , 1995, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[42]  N. Cowan Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[43]  N. Meiran,et al.  Component Processes in Task Switching , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[44]  P. Bertelson,et al.  Serial Choice Reaction-time as a Function of Response versus Signal-and-Response Repetition , 1965, Nature.

[45]  A. Ortony,et al.  Similarity and Analogical Reasoning , 1991 .

[46]  T Kleinsorge,et al.  Response repetition benefits and costs. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[47]  B. Hommel Event Files: Evidence for Automatic Integration of Stimulus-Response Episodes , 1998 .

[48]  Carolin Dudschig,et al.  Short Article: Why do we slow down after an error? Mechanisms underlying the effects of posterror slowing , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[49]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[50]  Richard Catrambone,et al.  The effects of surface and structural feature matches on the access of story analogs. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[51]  Steve Majerus,et al.  Verbal short-term memory reflects the sublexical organization of the phonological language network: Evidence from an incidental phonotactic learning paradigm , 2004 .

[52]  F. Craik,et al.  The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[53]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[54]  Henry Markovits,et al.  Efficiency of retrieval correlates with “logical” reasoning from causal conditional premises , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[55]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Activation and binding in verbal working memory: A dual-process model for the recognition of nonwords , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[56]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005). , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[57]  S. Handel,et al.  Social reasoning and spatial paralogic. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[58]  John Jonides,et al.  Dissociable neural mechanisms underlying response-based and familiarity-based conflict in working memory , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  Ralf Schulze,et al.  Working-memory capacity explains reasoning abilityand a little bit more , 2002 .

[60]  Randall W. Engle,et al.  Handbook of understanding and measuring intelligence , 2005 .

[61]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action , 1986 .

[62]  G. Logan On the ability to inhibit thought and action , 1984 .

[63]  M. J. Emerson,et al.  The role of inner speech in task switching: A dual-task investigation , 2003 .

[64]  B. Hommel The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation , 2000 .

[65]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  Competitive Learning: From Interactive Activation to Adaptive Resonance , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[66]  Patrick C. Kyllonen,et al.  Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?! , 1990 .

[67]  K. Oberauer Access to information in working memory: exploring the focus of attention. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[68]  Hugh Garavan,et al.  Serial attention within working memory , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[69]  M. J. Emerson,et al.  The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[70]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.

[71]  J. Driver,et al.  Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII , 2000 .

[72]  Z. Pylyshyn Robot's Dilemma: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence , 1987 .

[73]  S. Sloman The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[74]  Kevin N. Gurney,et al.  The Basal Ganglia and Cortex Implement Optimal Decision Making Between Alternative Actions , 2007, Neural Computation.

[75]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[76]  P N Johnson-Laird,et al.  Reasoning about relations. , 2005, Psychological review.

[77]  M. Daneman,et al.  Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[78]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .

[79]  Colin M. Macleod Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[80]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[81]  Michael N Jones,et al.  Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon. , 2007, Psychological review.

[82]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  The representation of instructions in working memory leads to autonomous response activation: Evidence from the first trials in the flanker paradigm , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[83]  Marci S. DeCaro,et al.  From poor performance to success under stress: working memory, strategy selection, and mathematical problem solving under pressure. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[84]  G. Dreisbach,et al.  How positive affect modulates cognitive control: reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[85]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .

[86]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Selective attention to elements in working memory. , 2003, Experimental psychology.

[87]  A. Newell Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[88]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Simultaneous cognitive operations in working memory after dual-task practice. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[89]  S. Lewandowsky,et al.  Forgetting in immediate serial recall: decay, temporal distinctiveness, or interference? , 2008, Psychological review.

[90]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Working memory and retrieval: a resource-dependent inhibition model. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[91]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[92]  K. Oberauer How to say no: single- and dual-process theories of short-term recognition tested on negative probes. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[93]  John Duncan,et al.  Goal neglect and Spearman's g: competing parts of a complex task. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[94]  D. Norris,et al.  Testing a positional model of the Hebb effect , 2003, Memory.

[95]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  Illusions of immediate memory: evidence of an attributional basis for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality , 1990 .

[96]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[97]  M. Shanahan,et al.  Applying global workspace theory to the frame problem , 2005, Cognition.

[98]  Aquiles Luna-Rodriguez,et al.  Response selection difficulty and asymmetrical costs of switching between tasks and stimuli: no evidence for an exogenous component of task-set reconfiguration. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[99]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Serial modules in parallel: the psychological refractory period and perfect time-sharing. , 2001, Psychological review.

[100]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  The multiple faces of working memory: Storage, processing, supervision, and coordination , 2003 .

[101]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Mechanisms of Analogical Learning. , 1987 .

[102]  T. E. Lange,et al.  Below the Surface: Analogical Similarity and Retrieval Competition in Reminding , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.

[103]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[104]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  The Measurement of Working Memory Capacity. , 2005 .

[105]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of attention switching and temporal-order information in short-term memory , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[106]  J. Bain,et al.  Set-size effects in primary memory: An age-related capacity limitation? , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[107]  A. Miyake,et al.  Not All Executive Functions Are Related to Intelligence , 2006, Psychological science.

[108]  S. Phillips,et al.  Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. , 1998, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[109]  N. Burgess,et al.  A revised model of short-term memory and long-term learning of verbal sequences , 2006 .

[110]  Lynn Nadel,et al.  Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science , 2003 .

[111]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[112]  B. Love Comparing supervised and unsupervised category learning , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[113]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live By , 1980 .

[114]  Mark W Greenlee,et al.  Spatial imagery in deductive reasoning: a functional MRI study. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[115]  Jonathan Evans In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[116]  Jochen Musch,et al.  On belief bias in syllogistic reasoning. , 2000, Psychological review.

[117]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Working memory and intelligence--their correlation and their relation: comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005). , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[118]  D. Wickens,et al.  Proactive inhibition and item similarity in short-term memory , 1963 .

[119]  Tony A Plate,et al.  Convolution-Based Memory Models , 2006 .

[120]  John R. Anderson The Architecture of Cognition , 1983 .

[121]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Interference in verbal working memory: Distinguishing similarity-based confusion, feature overwriting, and feature migration , 2008 .

[122]  J. Fodor,et al.  Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis , 1988, Cognition.

[123]  R. Engle,et al.  Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[124]  David L. Faigman,et al.  Human category learning. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[125]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Beyond resources: Formal models of complexity effects and age differences in working memory , 2001 .

[126]  J. Bain,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article How Many Variables Can Humans Process? , 2022 .

[127]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Updating of Working Memory: Lingering Bindings , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[128]  K. Oberauer Binding and inhibition in working memory: individual and age differences in short-term recognition. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[129]  M. Usher,et al.  The demise of short-term memory revisited: empirical and computational investigations of recency effects. , 2005, Psychological review.

[130]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Why are reasoning ability and working memory capacity related to mental speed? An investigation of stimulus–response compatibility in choice reaction time tasks , 2006 .

[131]  E. McKone,et al.  The decay of short-term implicit memory: Unpacking lag , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[132]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Control of the contents of working memory--a comparison of two paradigms and two age groups. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[133]  T. S. Hyde,et al.  Differential effects of incidental tasks on the organization of recall of a list of highly associated words. , 1969 .

[134]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[135]  Karl Josef Klauer,et al.  Teaching inductive reasoning: some theory and three experimental studies , 1996 .

[136]  Delos D. Wickens,et al.  The nature and timing of the retrieval process and of interference effects. , 1981 .

[137]  A. B. Blankenship Memory span: A review of the literature , 1938 .

[138]  Graham J. Hitch,et al.  How is the serial order of a verbal sequence coded? Some comparisons between models , 2005, Memory.

[139]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[140]  N. Burgess,et al.  Memory for serial order: A network model of the phonological loop and its timing , 1999 .

[141]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.

[142]  R. Proctor,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[143]  A. Kiesel,et al.  Task switching: on the origin of response congruency effects , 2007, Psychological research.

[144]  D. Norris,et al.  The primacy model: a new model of immediate serial recall. , 1998, Psychological review.

[145]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and reasoning ability , 2007 .

[146]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Set size and repetition matter: comment on Caramazza and Costa (2000) , 2001, Cognition.

[147]  J. de Houwer,et al.  Retrieval of incidental stimulus-response associations as a source of negative priming. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[148]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Which Working Memory Functions Predict Intelligence , 2008 .

[149]  J. Duncan,et al.  Intelligence and the Frontal Lobe: The Organization of Goal-Directed Behavior , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[150]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[151]  R. Engle,et al.  The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[152]  Yoav Kessler,et al.  The task rule congruency effect in task switching reflects activated long-term memory. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[153]  H. Heuer,et al.  Perspectives on Perception and Action , 1989 .

[154]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Rationality and reasoning , 1996 .

[155]  L L Jacoby,et al.  Isolating the contributions of familiarity and source information to item recognition: a time course analysis. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[156]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[157]  R. Kliegl,et al.  Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[158]  J. Delafresnaye,et al.  Brain mechanisms and learning , 1961 .

[159]  N. Burgess,et al.  Computational models of working memory: putting long-term memory into context , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[160]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  Working memory involvement in dual-task performance: Evidence from the backward compatibility effect , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[161]  B. Hommel,et al.  Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus–task bindings in task-shift costs , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[162]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[163]  U. Mayr Age differences in the selection of mental sets: the role of inhibition, stimulus ambiguity, and response-set overlap. , 2001, Psychology and aging.