The flash-lag effect as a spatiotemporal correlation structure.

The flash-lag effect refers to the phenomenon in which a flash adjacent to a continuously moving object is perceived to lag behind it. Phenomenally, the flash appears to be spatially shifted relative to the moving stimulus, and the amount of lag has often been quantified as the flash's nulling position, which is the physical spatial offset needed to establish perceptual alignment. The present study offers a better way to summarize flash-lag data. Instead of plotting data in terms of space, the psychometric function of the observer's relative-position judgment is drawn on spatiotemporal plot. The psychological process underlying illusory lag is formulated as spatiotemporal bias and uncertainty and their estimate as a spatiotemporal convolution kernel that best explains the spatiotemporal psychometric function. Two empirical procedures of kernel estimation are described. One procedure is to fit the free parameters of the kernel to experimental data for continuous motion trajectory. The second is to give an analytical solution to the kernel using experimental data for random motion trajectory. The two procedures yield similar kernels, with negligible spatial bias and uncertainty and substantial temporal bias and uncertainty. In addition, it is demonstrated that an experimental manipulation of temporal predictability of the flash can change the temporal bias in the estimated kernel. The results of this novel analysis reveal that the flash-lag effect is viewed as a spatiotemporal correlation structure, which is largely characterized by the tendency to compare the position of the flash in the past with the position of the moving item in the present.

[1]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Visual Motion Sensation Yielded by Non-visually Driven Attention , 1997, Vision Research.

[2]  M. Lappe,et al.  The position of moving objects. , 2000, Perception.

[3]  David Whitney,et al.  Temporal facilitation for moving stimuli is independent of changes in direction , 2000, Vision Research.

[4]  Markus Lappe,et al.  Temporal recruitment along the trajectory of moving objects and the perception of position , 1999, Vision Research.

[5]  Jüri Allik,et al.  Multiple Visual Latency , 1997 .

[6]  I. Murakami,et al.  Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  Romi Nijhawan,et al.  Motion extrapolation in catching , 1994, Nature.

[8]  Kuno Kirschfeld,et al.  The Fröhlich effect: a consequence of the interaction of visual focal attention and metacontrast , 1999, Vision Research.

[9]  Gopathy Purushothaman,et al.  Moving ahead through differential visual latency , 1998, Nature.

[10]  P Cavanagh,et al.  The Position of Moving Objects , 2000, Science.

[11]  K. Shapiro,et al.  The attentional blink , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Markus Lappe,et al.  A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based upon a slow averaging process , 2000, Vision Research.

[13]  S. Mateeff,et al.  Perceptual latencies are shorter for motion towards the fovea than for motion away , 1988, Vision Research.

[14]  R. Nijhawan,et al.  Visual decomposition of colour through motion extrapolation , 1997, Nature.

[15]  M. Lappe,et al.  Neuronal latencies and the position of moving objects , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[16]  L. Matin,et al.  Visual Perception of Direction for Stimuli Flashed During Voluntary Saccadic Eye Movements , 1965, Science.

[17]  I. Murakami,et al.  A flash-lag effect in random motion , 2001, Vision Research.

[18]  Stanley A. Klein,et al.  Extrapolation or attention shift? , 1995, Nature.

[19]  B. Oakley A nice ring to the centrosome , 1995, Nature.

[20]  E. Brenner,et al.  Motion extrapolation is not responsible for the flash–lag effect , 2000, Vision Research.

[21]  Alexandre Pouget,et al.  Perceived geometrical relationships affected by eye-movement signals , 1997, Nature.

[22]  R Nijhawan,et al.  The Role of Attention in Motion Extrapolation: Are Moving Objects ‘Corrected’ or Flashed Objects Attentionally Delayed? , 2000, Perception.

[23]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli , 2000, Vision Research.

[24]  T J Sejnowski,et al.  Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. , 2000, Science.

[25]  Romi Nijhawan,et al.  Extrapolation or attention shift? , 1995, Nature.