Teaching interaction design by research through design

Research-through-design (RtD) has become a well-established research approach within HCI research. In this paper we discuss how research-through-design can be applied as an explicit strategy for teaching interaction design. RtD is productive when teaching interaction design, because it keeps students in a constant loop of doing and reflecting, as well as highlights the value of theoretical concepts for understanding practice. This means that theoretical concepts become a resource that the students can draw on to understand and transform design practice, while at the same time fostering an integrated understanding of theory and practice in design. We base our work on a master's course series teaching advanced theoretical and practical subjects in interaction design. The main contribution of the paper is a set of principles for RtD-based design teaching, as well as the identification of potential gains of using this approach for teaching interaction design.

[1]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  HCI Theory: Classical, Modern, and Contemporary , 2012, HCI Theory.

[2]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning , 2014 .

[3]  Peter Dalsgaard,et al.  DESIGN ARGUMENTATION IN ACADEMIC DESIGN EDUCATION , 2013 .

[4]  Johan Redström.  Persuasive Design: Fringes and Foundations , 2006, PERSUASIVE.

[5]  Kristina Höök,et al.  Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research , 2012, TCHI.

[6]  Anna Vallgårda,et al.  Interaction Design as a Bricolage Practice , 2015, TEI.

[7]  D. Schon.  Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. The Jossey-Bass Higher Education Series. , 1987 .

[8]  Erik Grönvall,et al.  Teaching participatory design using live projects: critical reflections and lessons learnt , 2018, PDC.

[9]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  What is "critical" about critical design? , 2013, CHI.

[10]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Making representations work , 1995, CACM.

[11]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive computers: perspectives and research directions , 1998, CHI.

[12]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  Design tools in practice: studying the designer-tool relationship in interaction design , 2012, DIS '12.

[13]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas , 2008, TCHI.

[14]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Sources of inspiration: a language of design , 2000 .

[15]  Peter Dalsgård,et al.  The productive role of material design artefacts in participatory design events , 2012, NordiCHI.

[16]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI , 2007, CHI.

[17]  Sharon Poggenpohl,et al.  Thoughtful Interaction Design: A Design Perspective on Information Technology , 2007 .

[18]  Johanne S. Bjørndahl,et al.  Thinking together with material representations: Joint epistemic actions in creative problem solving , 2014 .

[19]  Alan Dix,et al.  Externalisation and design , 2011, DESIRE.

[20]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Learning as Reflective Conversation with Materials: Notes from Work in Progress , 1983 .

[21]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Virtual Video Prototyping , 2006, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[22]  G. Fischer,et al.  The enhancement of understanding through visual representations , 1986, CHI '86.

[23]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Dynamics of research through design , 2012, DIS '12.

[24]  Eva Eriksson,et al.  Towards a constructively aligned approach to teaching interaction design & children , 2014, IDC.

[25]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Designing marketing experiences , 2008, DIS '08.

[26]  Donald A. Schön.  Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions , 1987 .

[27]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[28]  Fred G. Martin,et al.  A general education course in tangible interaction design , 2010, TEI '10.

[29]  Deborah G. Tatar,et al.  "It's Just a Method!": a pedagogical experiment in interdisciplinary design , 2006, DIS '06.

[30]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Inspiration card workshops , 2006, DIS '06.

[31]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[32]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Critical design and critical theory: the challenge of designing for provocation , 2012, DIS '12.

[33]  Colin M. Gray,et al.  Flow of Competence in UX Design Practice , 2015, CHI.

[34]  Martin Brynskov,et al.  The design of tools for sketching sensor-based interaction , 2012, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[35]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Cardboard Computers: Mocking-it-up or Hands-on the Future , 1992 .

[36]  Rikard Lindell.  Crafting interaction: The epistemology of modern programming , 2013, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[37]  Muriel Zimmerman,et al.  Design Research Through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[38]  Sheffield Hallam,et al.  Designerly Tools , 2012 .

[39]  Andrew Quitmeyer,et al.  Teaching digital craft , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[40]  Kim Halskov,et al.  The emergence of ideas: the interplay between sources of inspiration and emerging design concepts , 2007 .

[41]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Humanistic HCI , 2015, Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics.

[42]  N. Cross.  Designerly ways of knowing , 2006 .