Bimodal invitation-navigation fair bets model for authority identification in a social network

We consider the problem of identifying the most respected, authoritative members of a large-scale online social network (OSN) by constructing a global ranked list of its members. The problem is distinct from the problem of identifying influencers: we are interested in identifying members who are influential in the real world, even when not necessarily so on the OSN. We focus on two sources for information about user authority: (a) invitations to connect, which are usually sent to people whom the inviter respects, and (b) members' browsing behavior, as profiles of more important people are viewed more often than others'. We construct two directed graphs over the same set of nodes (representing member profiles): the invitation graph and the navigation graph respectively. We show that the standard PageRank algorithm, a baseline in web page ranking, is not effective in people ranking, and develop a social capital based model, called the fair bets model, as a viable solution. We then propose a novel approach, called bimodal fair bets, for combining information from two (or more) endorsement graphs drawn from the same OSN, by simultaneously using the authority scores of nodes in one graph to inform the other, and vice versa, in a mutually reinforcing fashion. We evaluate the ranking results on the LinkedIn social network using this model, where members who have Wikipedia profiles are assumed to be authoritative. Experimental results show that our approach outperforms the baseline approach by a large margin.

[1]  Franco Scarselli,et al.  Inside PageRank , 2005, TOIT.

[2]  Giora Slutzki,et al.  Ranking participants in generalized tournaments , 2005, Int. J. Game Theory.

[3]  David F. Gleich,et al.  Tracking the random surfer: empirically measured teleportation parameters in PageRank , 2010, WWW '10.

[4]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Signed networks in social media , 2010, CHI.

[5]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  PEGASUS: mining peta-scale graphs , 2011, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[6]  Tie-Yan Liu,et al.  BrowseRank: letting web users vote for page importance , 2008, SIGIR '08.

[7]  Rizal Setya Perdana What is Twitter , 2013 .

[8]  George Cybenko,et al.  Discovering Influence in Communication Networks Using Dynamic Graph Analysis , 2010, 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing.

[9]  Laks V. S. Lakshmanan,et al.  Learning influence probabilities in social networks , 2010, WSDM '10.

[10]  Panayotis Antoniadis,et al.  Faving Reciprocity in Content Sharing Communities: A Comparative Analysis of Flickr and Twitter , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining.

[11]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Social Information Processing in Social News Aggregation , 2007, ArXiv.

[12]  Dániel Fogaras,et al.  Towards Scaling Fully Personalized PageRank: Algorithms, Lower Bounds, and Experiments , 2005, Internet Math..

[13]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[14]  Javed A. Aslam,et al.  Models for metasearch , 2001, SIGIR '01.

[15]  Hongyuan Zha,et al.  Co-ranking Authors and Documents in a Heterogeneous Network , 2007, Seventh IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2007).

[16]  J. Moon,et al.  On Generalized Tournament Matrices , 1970 .

[17]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Inferring networks of diffusion and influence , 2010, KDD.

[18]  Sergey Brin,et al.  The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[19]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Social Information Processing in News Aggregation , 2007, IEEE Internet Computing.

[20]  Qi He,et al.  TwitterRank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers , 2010, WSDM '10.

[21]  C. Lee Giles,et al.  Scholarly publishing in the Internet age: a citation analysis of computer science literature , 2001, Inf. Process. Manag..

[22]  H. Daniels Round-robin tournament scores , 1969 .

[23]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Predicting Influential Users in Online Social Networks , 2010, ArXiv.

[24]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy , 2010, ICWSM.