Reward can modulate attentional capture, independent of top-down set

The traditional distinction between exogenous and endogenous attentional control has recently been enriched with an additional mode of control, termed “selection history.” Recent findings have indicated, for instance, that previously rewarded or punished stimuli capture more attention than their physical attributes would predict. As such, the value that is associated with certain stimuli modulates attentional capture. This particular influence has also been shown for endogenous attention. Although recent leads have emerged, elucidating the influences of reward on exogenous and endogenous attention, it remains unclear to what extent exogenous attention is modulated by reward when endogenous attention is already deployed. We used a Posner cueing task in which exogenous and endogenous cues were presented to guide attention. Crucially, the exogenous cue also indicated the reward value. That is, the color of the exogenous cue indicated how much reward could be obtained on a given trial. The results showed main effects of endogenous and exogenous attention (i.e., speeded reaction times when either cue was valid, as compared to when it was invalid). Crucially, an interaction between exogenous cue validity and reward level was observed, indicating that reward-based associative-learning processes rapidly influence attentional capture, even when endogenous attention has been actively deployed.

[1]  Y. Yeshurun,et al.  Precueing attention to the target location diminishes crowding and reduces the critical distance. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[2]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  No capture outside the attentional window , 2010, Vision Research.

[4]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Visual Selective Attention and the Effects of Monetary Rewards , 2006, Psychological science.

[5]  Alex L. White,et al.  Interactions between voluntary and involuntary attention modulate the quality and temporal dynamics of visual processing , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Exogenous visual orienting by reward. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[7]  J. Lupiáñez,et al.  Spatial attention and conscious perception: Interactions and dissociations between and within endogenous and exogenous processes , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  What is top-down about contingent capture? , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[9]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Attentional capture by signals of threat , 2014, Cognition & emotion.

[10]  The effect of reward on orienting and reorienting in exogenous cuing , 2014, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[11]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  A. Henik,et al.  The Endogenous Modulation of IOR is Nasal-Temporal Asymmetric , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  E. Van der Burg,et al.  The role of spatial and nonspatial information in visual selection. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  H. J. Muller,et al.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  B. Anderson A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[17]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  The size of an attentional window modulates attentional capture by color singletons , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  R. Remington,et al.  Top-down modulation of preattentive processing: Testing the recovery account of contingent capture , 2006 .

[20]  Patryk A. Laurent,et al.  Value-driven attentional capture , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[23]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  J. Theeuwes Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Behavioral/systems/cognitive Reward Changes Salience in Human Vision via the Anterior Cingulate , 2022 .

[27]  Tom Beesley,et al.  When goals conflict with values: counterproductive attentional and oculomotor capture by reward-related stimuli. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[29]  J. Theeuwes Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  J. Geng,et al.  Reward associations and spatial probabilities produce additive effects on attentional selection , 2014, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[31]  J. Theeuwes Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[32]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Visual Cognition Reward Has a Residual Impact on Target Selection in Visual Search, but Not on the Suppression of Distractors , 2022 .