fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection

Contrasting theories of visual attention emphasize selection by spatial location, visual features (such as motion or colour) or whole objects. Here we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to test key predictions of the object-based theory, which proposes that pre-attentive mechanisms segment the visual array into discrete objects, groups, or surfaces, which serve as targets for visual attention. Subjects viewed stimuli consisting of a face transparently superimposed on a house, with one moving and the other stationary. In different conditions, subjects attended to the face, the house or the motion. The magnetic resonance signal from each subject's fusiform face area, parahippocampal place area and area MT/MST provided a measure of the processing of faces, houses and visual motion, respectively. Although all three attributes occupied the same location, attending to one attribute of an object (such as the motion of a moving face) enhanced the neural representation not only of that attribute but also of the other attribute of the same object (for example, the face), compared with attributes of the other object (for example, the house). These results cannot be explained by models in which attention selects locations or features, and provide physiological evidence that whole objects are selected even when only one visual attribute is relevant.

[1]  H. Grüneberg,et al.  Introduction to quantitative genetics , 1960 .

[2]  AURORA GARCIA-DoRADO,et al.  THE EFFECT OF NICHE PREFERENCE ON POLYMORPHISM PROTECTION IN A HETEROGENEOUS ENVIRONMENT , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  R. Rafal,et al.  Axis-based neglect of visual shapes , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Allocation of visual attention to spatial locations: Tradeoff functions for event-related brain potentials and detection performance , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  A M Dale,et al.  Event-related functional MRI: past, present, and future. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  W. Potts,et al.  The Evolution of Mating Preferences and Major Histocompatibility Complex Genes , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[7]  J. S. Jones,et al.  Can genes choose habitats? , 1980, Nature.

[8]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[9]  Sarah Lenington,et al.  The t complex : a story of genes, behavior, and populations , 1991 .

[10]  F J Ayala,et al.  Alloprocoptic selection: A mode of natural selection promoting polymorphism. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  M. G. Bulmer,et al.  Maintenance of genetic variability by mutation–selection balance: a child's guide through the jungle , 1989 .

[13]  Andre S. Gilburn,et al.  Evolution of female choice in seaweed flies: fisherian and good genes mechanisms operate in different populations , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[15]  R A Andersen,et al.  Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. I. Psychophysics , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  B. Shorrocks,et al.  A need for niches? , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  J. Felsenstein SKEPTICISM TOWARDS SANTA ROSALIA, OR WHY ARE THERE SO FEW KINDS OF ANIMALS? , 1981, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  E. DeYoe,et al.  Graded effects of spatial and featural attention on human area MT and associated motion processing areas. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Sarah Lenington,et al.  Female Preference and Variability Among t-Haplotypes in Wild House Mice , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[20]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Transient and sustained activity in a distributed neural system for human working memory , 1997, Nature.

[21]  W K Potts,et al.  The role of infectious disease, inbreeding and mating preferences in maintaining MHC genetic diversity: an experimental test. , 1994, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[22]  A. Treisman Strategies and models of selective attention. , 1969, Psychological review.

[23]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Selective attention to color and location: An analysis with event-related brain potentials , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  D. Somers,et al.  Functional MRI reveals spatially specific attentional modulation in human primary visual cortex. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  W. Potts,et al.  MHC–disassortative mating preferences reversed by cross–fostering , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  R. Meldola Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.

[29]  J. Duncan Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[30]  Pieter R. Roelfsema,et al.  Object-based attention in the primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey , 1998, Nature.

[31]  G A Orban,et al.  Attention to One or Two Features in Left or Right Visual Field: A Positron Emission Tomography Study , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  E. DeYoe,et al.  A physiological correlate of the 'spotlight' of visual attention , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  R. Hoekstra,et al.  Polymorphism from environmental heterogeneity: models are only robust if the heterozygote is close in fitness to the favoured homozygote in each environment. , 1985, Genetical research.

[34]  M. Valdés-Sosa,et al.  Switching Attention without Shifting the Spotlight: Object-Based Attentional Modulation of Brain Potentials , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  A. Treisman,et al.  Voluntary Attention Modulates fMRI Activity in Human MT–MST , 1997, Neuron.

[36]  Maurice W. Sabelis,et al.  Biological control of the bulb mite, Rhizoglyphus robini, by the predatory mite, Hypoaspis aculeifer, on lilies: predator-prey interactions at various spatial scales , 1996 .

[37]  G. Baylis,et al.  Movement and visual attention: the spotlight metaphor breaks down. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  K Nakayama,et al.  Visual attention to surfaces in three-dimensional space. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Increased Activity in Human Visual Cortex during Directed Attention in the Absence of Visual Stimulation , 1999, Neuron.

[40]  C D Salzman,et al.  Neural mechanisms for forming a perceptual decision. , 1994, Science.

[41]  P. Hedrick,et al.  Evolution and ecology of MHC molecules: from genomics to sexual selection. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[42]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[43]  Jerram L. Brown A theory of mate choice based on heterozygosity , 1997 .

[44]  M Corbetta,et al.  Attentional modulation of neural processing of shape, color, and velocity in humans. , 1990, Science.

[45]  Valdes-SosaMitchell,et al.  Switching Attention without Shifting the Spotlight: Object-Based Attentional Modulation of Brain Potentials , 1998 .

[46]  E. Simms,et al.  Natural enemies: The population biology of predators, parasites and diseases , 1993 .

[47]  R. Andersen,et al.  Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. II. Physiology , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[48]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI. , 1998, Science.

[49]  D. Heeger,et al.  Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  D. Futuyma,et al.  The Evolution of Ecological Specialization , 1988 .

[51]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[52]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  R. Andersen,et al.  Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[54]  S. Lenington,et al.  Preferences of female mice for males whose t-haplotype differs from their own , 1990, Animal Behaviour.