On the Performance of IEEE 802.11p and LTE-V2V for the Cooperative Awareness of Connected Vehicles

To improve safety on the roads, next-generation vehicles will be equipped with short-range communication technologies. Many applications enabled by such communication will be based on a continuous broadcast of information about the own status from each vehicle to the neighborhood, often referred as cooperative awareness or beaconing. Although the only standardized technology allowing direct vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication has been IEEE 802.11p until now, the latest release of long-term evolution (LTE) included advanced device-to-device features designed for the vehicular environment (LTE-V2V) making it a suitable alternative to IEEE 802.11p. Advantages and drawbacks are being considered for both technologies, and which one will be implemented is still under debate. The aim of this paper is thus to provide an insight into the performance of both technologies for cooperative awareness and to compare them. The investigation is performed analytically through the implementation of novel models for both IEEE 802.11p and LTE-V2V able to address the same scenario, with consistent settings and focusing on the same output metrics. The proposed models take into account several aspects that are often neglected by related works, such as hidden terminals and capture effect in IEEE 802.11p, the impact of imperfect knowledge of vehicles position on the resource allocation in LTE-V2V, and the various modulation and coding scheme combinations that are available in both technologies. Results show that LTE-V2V allows us to maintain the required quality of service at even double or more the distance than IEEE 802.11p in moderate traffic conditions. However, due to the half-duplex nature of devices and the structure of LTE frames, it shows lower capacity than IEEE 802.11p if short distances and very high vehicle density are targeted.

[1]  Aravind Kota Gopalakrishna,et al.  QoS-enabled group communication in integrated VANET-LTE heterogeneous wireless networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE 7th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob).

[2]  Antonella Molinaro,et al.  Enhancing IEEE 802.11p/WAVE to provide infotainment applications in VANETs , 2012, Ad Hoc Networks.

[3]  Barbara M. Masini,et al.  Cellular aided vehicular named data networking , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE).

[4]  Li Zhao,et al.  Support for vehicle-to-everything services based on LTE , 2016, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[5]  A. Molinaro,et al.  D2D in LTE vehicular networking: System model and upper bound performance , 2015, 2015 7th International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops (ICUMT).

[6]  Mario Gerla,et al.  LTE resource scheduling for vehicular safety applications , 2013, 2013 10th Annual Conference on Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services (WONS).

[7]  Sinem Coleri Ergen,et al.  Multihop-Cluster-Based IEEE 802.11p and LTE Hybrid Architecture for VANET Safety Message Dissemination , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[8]  Barbara M. Masini,et al.  IEEE 802.11p for cellular offloading in vehicular sensor networks , 2015, Comput. Commun..

[9]  Andreas Festag,et al.  Standards for vehicular communication—from IEEE 802.11p to 5G , 2015, e & i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik.

[10]  Elias Yaacoub,et al.  QoE Enhancement of SVC Video Streaming Over Vehicular Networks Using Cooperative LTE/802.11p Communications , 2015, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[11]  Georgios Karagiannis,et al.  Exploring the solution space of beaconing in VANETs , 2009, 2009 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC).

[12]  Barbara M. Masini,et al.  How many vehicles in the LTE-V2V awareness range with half or full duplex radios? , 2017, 2017 15th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications (ITST).

[13]  Anirban Mahanti,et al.  Performance Evaluation of 802.11 Broadcasts for A Single Cell Network With Unsaturated Nodes , 2008, Networking.

[14]  Erik G. Ström,et al.  Radio Resource Management for D2D-Based V2V Communication , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[15]  Barbara M. Masini,et al.  A Survey on Infrastructure-Based Vehicular Networks , 2017, Mob. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  Delay-sensitive content distribution via peer-to-peer collaboration in public safety vehicular ad-hoc networks , 2014, Ad Hoc Networks.

[17]  Hai Le Vu,et al.  Performance Analysis of the IEEE 802.11 MAC Protocol for DSRC Safety Applications , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[18]  Philippe J. Sartori,et al.  LTE evolution for vehicle-to-everything services , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[19]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Multi-Hop Connectivity Probability in Infrastructure-Based Vehicular Networks , 2012, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[20]  Li Zhao,et al.  LTE-V: A TD-LTE-Based V2X Solution for Future Vehicular Network , 2016, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[21]  Benoît Champagne,et al.  Enhanced autonomous resource selection for LTE-based V2V communication , 2016, 2016 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC).

[22]  Abdelmajid Khelil,et al.  On the suitability of Device-to-Device communications for road traffic safety , 2014, 2014 IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT).

[23]  Antti Toskala,et al.  LTE for UMTS - OFDMA and SC-FDMA Based Radio Access , 2009 .

[24]  Barbara M. Masini,et al.  Performance Analysis of V2V Beaconing Using LTE in Direct Mode With Full Duplex Radios , 2015, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[25]  Mario Gerla,et al.  Vehicular networks and the future of the mobile internet , 2011, Comput. Networks.

[26]  Sergey D. Andreev,et al.  Estimation of a successful beacon reception probability in vehicular ad-hoc networks , 2009, IWCMC.

[27]  Hazem H. Refai,et al.  A Quantitative Approach to Evaluate DSRC Highway Inter-Vehicle Safety Communication , 2007, IEEE GLOBECOM 2007 - IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[28]  Sabato Marco Siniscalchi,et al.  Architecture for parking management in smart cities , 2014 .

[29]  Alexey V. Vinel,et al.  3GPP LTE Versus IEEE 802.11p/WAVE: Which Technology is Able to Support Cooperative Vehicular Safety Applications? , 2012, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[30]  Jon W. Mark,et al.  Performance Analysis and Enhancement of the DSRC for VANET's Safety Applications , 2013, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[31]  Fan Bai,et al.  Mobile Vehicle-to-Vehicle Narrow-Band Channel Measurement and Characterization of the 5.9 GHz Dedicated Short Range Communication (DSRC) Frequency Band , 2007, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[32]  Zeeshan Hameed Mir,et al.  On the Performance Comparison between IEEE 802.11p and LTE-Based Vehicular Networks , 2014, 2014 IEEE 79th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[33]  Michael Menth,et al.  A quantitative study of Cooperative Awareness Messages in production VANETs , 2014, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[34]  Barbara M. Masini,et al.  Beaconing from connected vehicles: IEEE 802.11p vs. LTE-V2V , 2016, 2016 IEEE 27th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC).

[35]  Gerhard Fettweis,et al.  Performance Evaluation of ETSI GeoNetworking for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2015, 2015 IEEE 81st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[36]  Thomas Kürner,et al.  Physical Layer Performance Comparison of LTE and IEEE 802.11p for Vehicular Communication in an Urban NLOS Scenario , 2014, 2014 IEEE 80th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2014-Fall).

[37]  Zeeshan Hameed Mir,et al.  LTE and IEEE 802.11p for vehicular networking: a performance evaluation , 2014, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..