A new view of safety: Safety 2.

[1]  E. Hollnagel,et al.  From Safety-I to Safety-II: A White Paper , 2014 .

[2]  J. Reason.  Human error: models and management , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  E. Hollnagel,et al.  Resilient Health Care , 2013 .

[4]  Evgeny V. Morozov,et al.  To Save Everything, Click Here: Technology, Solutionism and the Urge to Fix Problems that Don't Exist by E. Morozov, ed., , 2013, Inf. Polity.

[5]  David D Woods,et al.  Steering the Reverberations of Technology Change on Fields of Practice: Laws that Govern Cognitive Work , 2019, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

[6]  D. Whitaker,et al.  The Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety in Anaesthesiology , 2010, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[7]  D M Gaba,et al.  Anaesthesiology as a model for patient safety in health care , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  EMERGENT COMPLEX SYSTEMS , 1994 .

[9]  M. Irwin,et al.  Quantifying and communicating peri‐operative risk , 2014, Anaesthesia.

[10]  Siddharth S Adyanthaya,et al.  Never events: an anaesthetic perspective , 2014 .

[11]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Resilience Engineering in Practice: A Guidebook , 2012 .

[12]  T M Cook,et al.  Shaping quality: the use of performance polygons for multidimensional presentation and interpretation of qualitative performance data. , 2012, British journal of anaesthesia.

[13]  D. L. Simms,et al.  Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies , 1986 .

[14]  P. Myles,et al.  Quality and Safety Indicators in Anesthesia: A Systematic Review , 2009, Anesthesiology.

[15]  Patrick T. W. Hudson,et al.  Implementing a safety culture in a major multi-national , 2007 .

[16]  E. Hollnagel.  The Etto Principle: Efficiency-Thoroughness Trade-Off: Why Things That Go Right Sometimes Go Wrong , 2009 .

[17]  M. Lerner,et al.  The Belief in a Just World , 1980 .

[18]  H. W. Heinrich,et al.  Industrial Accident Prevention: a Scientific Approach , 1951 .