Asynchronous Computer-mediated Communication versus Face-to-face Collaboration: Results on Student Learning, Quality and Satisfaction

Although there has been more than a decade of literature on computer-mediated communication in education, the research has been unclear as to whether it is an effective replacement for face-to-face (FtF) collaboration. This study sought to add to this body of research by exploring the effects of two modes of collaboration on student groups. Following a repeated-measures experimental design, each student group collaborated on two case studies, one using face-to-face collaboration and the other using asynchronous computer conferencing technology as a means of collaboration. Empirical findings indicate that asynchronous collaboration is as effective as face-to-face collaboration in terms of learning, quality of solution, solution content, and satisfaction with the solution quality. However, students were significantly less satisfied with the asynchronous learning experience, both in terms of the group interaction process and the quality of group discussions.

[1]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  The Information Age Confronts Education: Case Studies on Electronic Classrooms , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  I. C. Mc Neill.  National Educational Association , 1903 .

[3]  B. Clinton.  Teaching to Rebuild the Nation. , 1988 .

[4]  A. Levine,et al.  When Hope and Fear Collide: A Portrait of Today's College Student. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1998 .

[5]  Beverly R. Wester.  Computer conferencing: a campus meets online , 1989 .

[6]  Eva Mary Bures,et al.  Computer‐supported collaborative learning and distance education , 1996 .

[7]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Interactivity and Communication Mode Choice in Ongoing Management Groups , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  Scott L. Althaus.  Please Scroll down for Article Communication Education Computer-mediated Communication in the University Classroom: an Experiment with On-line Discussions , 2022 .

[9]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Ability and Task Difficulty in Cognitive Psychology , 1981 .

[10]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. , 1994, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  Curtis J. Bonk.  Electronic Conferencing Tools for Student Apprenticeship and Perspective Taking. , 1996 .

[12]  R. Glaser,et al.  Learning Theory and the Study of Instruction , 1989 .

[13]  S. Green,et al.  The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group process , 1980 .

[14]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Learning together and alone: Cooperation, competition, and individualization , 1975 .

[15]  Maryam Alavi,et al.  Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: An Empirical Evaluation , 1994, MIS Q..

[16]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Asynchronous learning networks as a virtual classroom , 1997, CACM.

[17]  Rosalie A. Wells,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communications for Distance Education and Training: Literature Review and International Resources , 1990 .

[18]  Jeff Golub,et al.  Focus on collaborative learning , 1989 .

[19]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  The Virtual Classroom: Learning Without Limits Via Computer Networks , 1994 .

[20]  Sam Keen.  Looking at Ourselves Looking at Each Other. , 1989 .

[21]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Effects of computer-mediated communication systems on learning, performance and satisfaction: a comparison of groups and individuals solving ethical scenarios , 1997 .

[22]  W. R. Whipple,et al.  Collaborative Learning: Recognizing It When We See It. , 1987 .

[23]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Using IT to Reengineer Business Education: An Exploratory Investigation of Collaborative Telelearning , 1995, MIS Q..

[24]  Vairavan Arunachalam.  Decision aiding in multi-party transfer pricing negotiation : the effects of computer-mediated communication and structured interaction , 1991 .

[25]  John S. Carroll,et al.  Applied social psychology and organizational settings , 1991 .

[26]  Daniel V. Eastmond.  Alone but Together: Adult Distance Study through Computer Conferencing , 1995 .

[27]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  The Use of Information Technology to Enhance Management School Education: A Theoretical View , 1995, MIS Q..

[28]  David A. Karp,et al.  The college classroom: Some observations on the meanings of student participation. , 1976 .

[29]  Dennis S. Gouran,et al.  Behavioral correlates of perceptions of quality in decision‐making discussions , 1978 .

[30]  James L. Morrison.  The computer conference: adaptive problem-solving within a spontaneous technological framework , 1992 .

[31]  Bonita L. Daly,et al.  The influence of face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication channels on collective induction , 1993 .

[32]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Collaborative learning in a virtual classroom: highlights of findings , 1988, CSCW '88.

[34]  Thomas D. Snyder,et al.  Digest of Education Statistics , 1994 .

[35]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Impacts of Asynchronous Learning Networks on Individual and Group Problem Solving: A Field Experiment , 1999 .

[36]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[37]  Ravi S. Behara,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Electronic Groups in the Classroom , 1998 .

[38]  Merrill Warkentin,et al.  Virtual Teams versus Face-to-Face Teams: An Exploratory Study of a Web-based Conference System* , 1997 .

[39]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  The “Virtual Classroom”: Using Computer‐Mediated Communication for University Teaching , 1986 .

[40]  Clark Bouton,et al.  Learning in groups , 1983 .