Candidate Image in Election Campaigns: Attribute Agenda Setting, Affective Priming, and Voting Intentions

Combining three telephone surveys during the 2006 Israeli elections and a content analysis of leading Israeli newspapers, this study extended the function of attribute agenda setting and priming. Analysis documented that throughout the course of a campaign, public opinion fluctuates in tandem with the saliency of candidate attributes emphasized in the news. We also found an important consequence of attribute agenda setting, affective priming of candidate attributes, by which the prominent tone of the media's candidate attributes functions as a criterion for evaluating a candidate's suitability. Finally, this public evaluative tone was linked with voting intentions for the candidate's political party.

[1]  Y. Peri.  Telepopulism: Media and Politics in Israel , 2004 .

[2]  Jan Kleinnijenhuis,et al.  A test of rivaling approaches to explain news effects: News on isue positions of parties, real-world developments, support and criticism, and success and failure , 2007 .

[3]  Maxwell McCombs,et al.  News Story Descriptions and the Public's Opinions of Political Candidates , 2007 .

[4]  Tamir Sheafer,et al.  The Personalization(s) of Politics: Israel, 1949–2003 , 2007 .

[5]  Tamir Sheafer.  Charismatic Communication Skill, Media Legitimacy, and Electoral Success , 2008 .

[6]  M. Wattenberg,et al.  Schematic Assessments of Presidential Candidates , 1986, American Political Science Review.

[7]  C. Bean.  The Electoral Influence of Party Leader Images in Australia and New Zealand , 1993 .

[8]  Scott L. Althaus,et al.  Priming Effects in Complex Information Environments: Reassessing the Impact of News Discourse on Presidential Approval , 2006, The Journal of Politics.

[9]  A. King.  Do Leaders' Personalities Really Matter? , 2002 .

[10]  H. Brosius,et al.  Beyond Agenda-Setting: The Influence of Partisanship and Television Reporting on the Electorate's Voting Intentions , 1992 .

[11]  Spiro K. Kiousis,et al.  First- and Second-Level Agenda-Building and Agenda-Setting Effects: Exploring the Linkages Among Candidate News Releases, Media Coverage, and Public Opinion During the 2002 Florida Gubernatorial Election , 2006 .

[12]  Shanto Iyengar,et al.  News Coverage of the Gulf Crisis and Public Opinion , 1993 .

[13]  Heiner Meulemann,et al.  Mass Media Research , 2009 .

[14]  J. A. Brown.  The Major Effect: Changes in Party Leadership and Party Popularity , 1992 .

[15]  K. Hacker.  Candidate Images in Presidential Elections , 1995 .

[16]  M. McCombs,et al.  THE ROLE OF THE PRESS IN DETERMINING VOTER REACTIONS TO PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARIES1 , 1978 .

[17]  J. Blumler,et al.  The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features , 1999 .

[18]  Warren E. Miller,et al.  Policy Direction and Performance Evaluation: Complementary Explanations of the Reagan Elections , 1990, British Journal of Political Science.

[19]  Donald E. Stokes.  Some Dynamic Elements of Contests for the Presidency , 1966, American Political Science Review.

[20]  M. Mendelsohn.  The Media's Persuasive Effects: The Priming of Leadership in the 1988 Canadian Election , 1994, Canadian Journal of Political Science.

[21]  Philemon Bantimaroudis,et al.  Candidate Image Attributes , 1999 .

[22]  Tamir Sheafer,et al.  How to Evaluate It: The Role of Story‐Evaluative Tone in Agenda Setting and Priming , 2007 .

[23]  S. Iyengar,et al.  News That Matters: Television and American Opinion , 1987 .

[24]  M. Lyons.  Presidential Character Revisited , 1997 .

[25]  Presidential candidate images , 2004 .

[26]  Gerald M. Kosicki,et al.  Priming and Media Impact on the Evaluations of the President's Performance , 1997 .

[27]  Guy J. Golan,et al.  Second-Level Agenda Setting in the New Hampshire Primary: A Comparison of Coverage in Three Newspapers and Public Perceptions of Candidates , 2001 .

[28]  Gabriel Weimann,et al.  Agenda Building, Agenda Setting, Priming, Individual Voting Intentions, and the Aggregate Results: An Analysis of Four Israeli Elections , 2005 .

[29]  Gideon Rahat.  The Politics of Reform in Israel: How the Israeli Mixed System Came to Be , 2003 .

[30]  Steven D. Brown,et al.  Forming Impressions of Political Leaders: A Cross‐National Comparison , 1999 .

[31]  Warren E. Miller,et al.  Ideology in the 1972 Election: Myth or Reality—A Rejoinder , 1976, American Political Science Review.

[32]  G. Mazzoleni,et al.  "Mediatization" of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy? , 1999 .

[33]  D. O. Sears,et al.  The person-positivity bias. , 1983 .

[34]  J. Krosnick,et al.  NewsMedia Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: A Program of Research on the Priming Hypothesis , 1996 .

[35]  M. Roberts,et al.  Agenda setting and political advertising: Origins of the news agenda , 1994 .

[36]  Guy J. Golan,et al.  Agenda Setting and International News: Media Influence on Public Perceptions of Foreign Nations , 2004 .

[37]  J. P. Pfiffner,et al.  The modern presidency , 1993 .

[38]  M. McCombs.  Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion , 2004 .

[39]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  Altering the Foundations of Support for the President Through Priming , 1990 .

[40]  C. Reinemann,et al.  Do the Candidates Matter? , 2001 .

[41]  E. López-Escobar,et al.  Setting the agenda of attributes in the 1996 Spanish general election , 2000 .

[42]  David H. Weaver.  Media agenda-setting in a Presidential election: Issues, images, and interest , 1981 .

[43]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Think about it This Way: Attribute Agenda-Setting Function of the Press and the public's Evaluation of a Local Issue , 2002 .