The complexity of the corporation

We discuss the notion of complexity as applied to firms and corporations. We introduce the background to complex adaptive systems, and discuss whether this presents an appropriate model or metaphor to be used within management science. We consider whether a corporation should be thought of as a complex system, and conclude that a firm within an industry can be defined as a complex system within a complex system. Whether we can say that the use of complexity research will fundamentally improve firm performance will depend on the effect on success derived from its application.

[1]  Bill McKelvey,et al.  Complexity Theory in Organization Science: Seizing the Promise or Becoming a Fad? , 1999 .

[2]  G. Nigel Gilbert,et al.  Simulation for the social scientist , 1999 .

[3]  S. Kauffman At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity , 1995 .

[4]  D. Robertson Agent-Based Models of a Banking Network as an Example of a Turbulent Environment: The Deliberate vs. Emergent Strategy Debate Revisited , 2003 .

[5]  David M. Raup,et al.  How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organized Criticality , 1997 .

[6]  Mine Karatas-Ozkan,et al.  Changing Conversations in Organizations: A Complexity Approach to Change , 2004 .

[7]  M. Mazumdar,et al.  Avoiding Complexity Catastrophe in Coevolutionary Pockets: Strategies for Rugged Landscapes , 1999 .

[8]  Tony Curzon Price,et al.  Emergence: From Chaos to Order by John H. Holland , 1998, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[9]  R. Axtell Zipf Distribution of U.S. Firm Sizes , 2001, Science.

[10]  Patricia Shaw,et al.  Complexity and Management: Fad or Radical Challenge to Systems Thinking? , 2002 .

[11]  Susanne Kelly,et al.  The Complexity Advantage: How the Science of Complexity Can Help Your Business Achieve Peak Performance , 1999 .

[12]  Michael Creutz,et al.  Fractals and Self-Organized Criticality , 1994 .

[13]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos , 1998 .

[14]  R. Axtell The Emergence of Firms in a Population of Agents , 1999 .

[15]  R. Stacey Complexity and Creativity in Organizations , 1996 .

[16]  Morris B. Holbrook,et al.  Complexity and Management: Fad or Radical Challenge to Systems Thinking? , 2002 .

[17]  John Child,et al.  Organizations As Adaptive Systems in Complex Environments: the Case of China , 1999 .

[18]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up , 1996 .

[19]  Jan W. Rivkin Imitation of Complex Strategies , 2000 .

[20]  Benoit Morel,et al.  Through the Looking Glass of Complexity: the Dynamics of Organizations As Adaptive and Evolving Systems , 1999 .

[21]  D. Janzen WHEN IS IT COEVOLUTION? , 1980, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[22]  K. Eisenhardt Coevolving : At last, a way to make synergies work , 2000 .

[23]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos , 1998 .

[24]  T. Schelling Micromotives and Macrobehavior , 1978 .

[25]  Tang,et al.  Self-organized criticality. , 1988, Physical review. A, General physics.

[26]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Landscape Design: Designing for Local Action in Complex Worlds , 1999 .

[27]  P. Raven,et al.  BUTTERFLIES AND PLANTS: A STUDY IN COEVOLUTION , 1964 .

[28]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier , 2000 .

[29]  BoschFrans A. J. Van Den,et al.  Coevolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment , 1999 .

[30]  Daniel A. Levinthal Adaptation on rugged landscapes , 1997 .

[31]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Co-evolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities , 1999 .

[32]  T. Fuller,et al.  Moving beyond metaphor , 2000 .

[33]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science , 1999, Organization Science.