One True Anaphor

I argue that there is only one true anaphor in natural language, which takes many shapes. Building on the idea that some pronouns are constructed and others are ‘‘natural-born’’ with features, as suggested by Kratzer (2009), I suggest that all nonlocally anteceded bound variable pronouns that are traditionally bound (c-commanded) are the spell-out of a special, but universally available, dependent form, D-bound. The language-specific spell-out of D-bound in phase-internal contexts is responsible for Principle A effects, but not every language imposes phase-internal morphology for binding (thus, Principle A effects are not universal). This approach resolves morphological paradoxes that arise in ellipsis contexts when distance-bound antecedent forms behave as locally bound and vice versa. Finally, the distribution of Principle B and C effects is shown to be a consequence of the distribution of D-bound—the preferred form for anaphoric relations wherever it is available.

[1]  Chris Barker,et al.  Quantificational Binding Does Not Require C-Command , 2012, Linguistic Inquiry.

[2]  Tal Siloni Reciprocal verbs and symmetry , 2012 .

[3]  T. Reinhart Anaphora and semantic interpretation , 1983 .

[4]  A. Kratzer Making a Pronoun: Fake Indexicals as Windows into the Properties of Pronouns , 2009, Linguistic Inquiry.

[5]  Daniel Büring,et al.  Binding Theory by Daniel Büring , 2005 .

[6]  Adrian Brasoveanu,et al.  Sentence-internal different as quantifier-internal anaphora , 2011 .

[7]  P. Boyeldieu Les pronoms logophoriques dans les langues d'Afrique centrale , 2004 .

[8]  Dominique Sportiche,et al.  Pronouns, logical variables and logophoricity in Abe , 1989 .

[9]  K. Safir Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax, the: Syntax, binding, and patterns of anaphora , 2013 .

[10]  Peter Siemund,et al.  Intensifiers and reflexives , 2000 .

[11]  Marcel den Dikken,et al.  Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax, the: Syntax and the external interfaces , 2013 .

[12]  E. Reuland Primitives of Binding , 2001, Linguistic Inquiry.

[13]  E. Williams,et al.  Indices and identity , 1994 .

[14]  Dave Kush,et al.  “Reanalysis” Is Raising to Object† , 2015 .

[15]  K. Safir,et al.  Complex Anaphora in Lubukusu , 2012 .

[16]  Pranav Anand,et al.  De de se , 2006 .

[17]  P. Schlenker A Plea For Monsters , 2003 .

[18]  J. Legate Some Interface Properties of the Phase , 2003, Linguistic Inquiry.

[19]  Danny Fox,et al.  Cyclic Linearization of Syntactic Structure , 2005 .

[20]  Cedric Boeckx,et al.  On the particulars of Universal Grammar: implications for acquisition , 2014 .

[21]  Ken Safir,et al.  Viable Syntax: Rethinking Minimalist Architecture , 2010, Biolinguistics.

[22]  Ken Safir,et al.  The Syntax of Anaphora , 2004 .

[23]  J. Higginbotham Pronouns and Bound Variables , 1980 .

[24]  A. Bonomi,et al.  Only: Association with focus in event semantics , 1993 .

[25]  P. Materna,et al.  Logical Form , 2005 .

[26]  A. Belletti Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol.3 , 2004 .

[27]  Paul D. Elbourne Situations and individuals , 2005 .

[28]  Miloje Despić,et al.  Binding and the Structure of NP in Serbo-Croatian , 2013, Linguistic Inquiry.

[29]  Glyn Hicks The Derivation of Anaphoric Relations , 2009 .

[30]  D. Buring,et al.  BINDING THEORY , 2003 .

[31]  M. Ronat,et al.  La Grammaire modulaire , 1986 .

[32]  Ken Safir,et al.  Person, context and perspective , 2004 .

[33]  Fredrik Heinat,et al.  Probes, pronouns and Binding in the Minimalist Program , 2008 .

[34]  A. Hestvik Reflexives and ellipsis , 1995 .

[35]  Zygmunt Frajzyngier,et al.  Reflexives. Forms and Functions , 2000 .

[36]  Stuart M. Shieber,et al.  Ellipsis and higher-order unification , 1991 .

[37]  Danny Fox,et al.  Economy and Semantic Interpretation , 1999 .

[38]  K. Safir Coconstrual and Narrow Syntax , 2008 .

[39]  Ž. Bošković Getting Really Edgy: On the Edge of the Edge , 2016, Linguistic Inquiry.

[40]  Nathan Salmon,et al.  Reflexivity , 1986, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[41]  A. Zaenen,et al.  Case and grammatical functions: The Icelandic passive , 1985 .

[42]  Östen Dahl,et al.  On so-called ‘sloppy identity’ , 2004, Synthese.

[43]  Sam Mchombo,et al.  The syntax of Chichewa , 2004 .

[44]  Pierre Pica,et al.  Atomism and Binding , 2000 .

[45]  Eric Reuland,et al.  Anaphora and Language Design , 2011 .

[46]  Volker Gast,et al.  The grammar of identity , 2006 .

[47]  Binding Local Person Pronouns Without Semantically Empty Features , 2005 .

[48]  Richard S. Kayne The Antisymmetry of Syntax , 1994 .

[49]  T. Reinhart,et al.  The innateness of binding and coreference , 1993 .

[50]  Tanya Reinhart,et al.  Interface Strategies : Optimal and Costly Computations , 2006 .

[51]  K. Safir The Syntax of (In)dependence , 2004 .