Trigeminal perception is necessary to localize odors

The human ability to localize odorants has been examined in a number of studies, but the findings are contradictory. In the present study we investigated the human sensitivity and ability to localize hydrogen sulphide (H(2)S), which in low concentrations stimulates the olfactory system selectively, the olfactory-trigeminal substance isoamyl acetate (IAA), and the trigeminal substance carbon dioxide (CO(2)). A general requirement for testing of localization was the conscious perception of the applied stimuli by the participants. Using Signal Detection Theory, we determined the human sensitivity in response to stimulation with these substances. Then the subjects' ability to localize the three different substances was tested. We found that humans can detect H(2)S in low concentration (2 ppm) with moderate sensitivity, and possess a high sensitivity in response to stimulation with 8 ppm H(2)S, 17.5% IAA, 50% v/v CO(2). In the localization experiment, subjects could localize neither the low nor the high concentration of H(2)S. In contrast, subjects possessed the ability to localize IAA and CO(2) stimuli. These results clearly demonstrate that humans, in spite of the aware perception, are not able to localize substances which only activate the olfactory system independent of their concentration, but they possess an ability to localize odorants that additionally excite the trigeminal system.

[1]  C. Del Gratta,et al.  Trigeminal activation using chemical, electrical, and mechanical stimuli , 2008, PAIN.

[2]  C. Wysocki,et al.  Nasal trigeminal chemosensitivity across the adult life span , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  G Kobal,et al.  "Sniffin' sticks": screening of olfactory performance. , 1996, Rhinology.

[4]  T. Hummel,et al.  'Sniffin' sticks': olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. , 1997, Chemical senses.

[5]  L. Cahill,et al.  Hemispheric lateralization in the processing of odor pleasantness versus odor names. , 1999, Chemical senses.

[6]  J. Wild,et al.  Having the nerve to home: trigeminal magnetoreceptor versus olfactory mediation of homing in pigeons , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[7]  J. Pardo,et al.  Functional neuroimaging of the olfactory system in humans. , 2000, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[8]  Syngcuk Kim,et al.  Biologic properties of eugenol and zinc oxide-eugenol. A clinically oriented review. , 1992, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[9]  M. Wiesmann,et al.  Das olfaktorische System des Menschen , 2006, Der Nervenarzt.

[10]  G. Brand,et al.  Quality of odor and olfactory lateralization processes in humans , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[11]  S. Roth,et al.  Toxicology of hydrogen sulfide. , 1992 .

[12]  T. Hummel,et al.  The influence of stimulus duration on odor perception. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[13]  Upinder S Bhalla,et al.  Rats Smell in Stereo , 2006, Science.

[14]  P. Jurs,et al.  Intranasal trigeminal stimulation from odorous volatiles: Psychometric responses from anosmic and normal humans , 1978, Physiology & Behavior.

[15]  G Kobal,et al.  Cerebral chemosensory evoked potentials elicited by chemical stimulation of the human olfactory and respiratory nasal mucosa. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  Gerd Kobal,et al.  Pain-related electrical potentials of the human nasal mucosa elicited by chemical stimulation , 1985, Pain.

[17]  T. Hummel,et al.  Ortho- and Retronasal Presentation of Olfactory Stimuli Modulates Odor Percepts , 2008 .

[18]  Thomas Hummel,et al.  Cerebral activation to intranasal chemosensory trigeminal stimulation. , 2007, Chemical senses.

[19]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[20]  L. Klimek,et al.  Multicenter investigation of 1,036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds , 2000, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[21]  W. Cain,et al.  Trigeminal and olfactory sensitivity: comparison of modalities and methods of measurement , 1998, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[22]  Jae Hyun Kim,et al.  Activation of Vanilloid Receptor 1 (VR1) by Eugenol , 2003, Journal of dental research.

[23]  M. Wiesmann,et al.  [The human olfactory system. Anatomy and physiology]. , 2006, Der Nervenarzt.

[24]  C. J. Wysocki,et al.  Spatiotemporal Masking in Pure Olfaction a , 1998, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[25]  R. Schneider,et al.  Dependency of olfactory localization on non-olfactory cues , 1967 .

[26]  Donald A Wilson,et al.  Respiratory Airflow Pattern at the Rat’s Snout and an Hypothesis Regarding Its Role in Olfaction , 1999, Physiology & Behavior.

[27]  Georg v. Békésy,et al.  OLFACTORY ANALOGUE TO DIRECTIONAL HEARING. , 1964 .

[28]  M. Lloyd,et al.  Signal Detection Theory and the Psychophysics of Pain: An Introduction and Review , 1976, Psychosomatic medicine.

[29]  Franco Lepore,et al.  Odor localization and sniffing. , 2008, Chemical senses.

[30]  T. Hummel,et al.  Is there directional smelling? , 1989, Experientia.

[31]  G. Brand,et al.  Lateralization in human nasal chemoreception: differences in bilateral electrodermal responses related to olfactory and trigeminal stimuli , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[32]  G. Zagli,et al.  Hydrogen sulfide causes vanilloid receptor 1‐mediated neurogenic inflammation in the airways , 2005, British journal of pharmacology.

[33]  K. Hörmann,et al.  Arousal responses to olfactory or trigeminal stimulation during sleep. , 2007, Sleep.

[34]  G. Brand,et al.  Complexity of olfactory lateralization processes revealed by functional imaging: a review , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[35]  Thomas Hummel,et al.  The influence of training on chemosensory event-related potentials and interactions between the olfactory and trigeminal systems. , 2004, Chemical senses.

[36]  B. P. Halpern,et al.  No oral-cavity-only discrimination of purely olfactory odorants. , 2008, Chemical senses.

[37]  K. Hörmann,et al.  Chemosensory event-related potentials in relation to side of stimulation, age, sex, and stimulus concentration , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[38]  A. Mackay-Sim,et al.  Normative data for the “Sniffin’ Sticks” including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects , 2007, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[39]  M. Bensafi,et al.  Neural coding of stimulus concentration in the human olfactory and intranasal trigeminal systems , 2008, Neuroscience.

[40]  Dennis Stefani,et al.  Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and sour gas effects on the eye. A historical perspective. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[41]  Sanne Boesveldt,et al.  Signal-to-noise ratio of chemosensory event-related potentials , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[42]  Jessica Porter,et al.  Brain Mechanisms for Extracting Spatial Information from Smell , 2005, Neuron.

[43]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  Functional MR imaging of regional brain responses to pleasant and unpleasant odors. , 1998, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[44]  Martin Wiesmann,et al.  Eye closure in darkness animates olfactory and gustatory cortical areas , 2006, NeuroImage.

[45]  M J Brammer,et al.  Functional MR imaging during odor stimulation: preliminary data. , 1997, Radiology.