Explaining variations in hospital death rates. Randomness, severity of illness, quality of care.

We used administrative (Part A Medicare) data to identify a representative sample of 1126 patients with congestive heart failure and 1150 with acute myocardial infarction in hospitals with significant unexpectedly high inpatient, age-sex-race-disease-specific death rates ("targeted") vs all other ("untargeted") hospitals in four states. Although death rates in targeted hospitals were 5.0 to 10.9 higher per 100 admissions than in untargeted hospitals, 56% to 82% of the excess could result from purely random variation. Differences in the quality of the process of care (based on a medical record review) could not explain the remaining statistically significant differences in mortality. Comparing targeted hospitals with subsets of untargeted ones, eg, those with lower than expected death rates, did not affect this conclusion. Severity of illness explained up to 2.8 excess deaths per 100 admissions for patients with myocardial infarction. Identifying hospitals that provide poor-quality care based on administrative data and single-year death rates is unlikely; targeting based on time periods greater than 1 year may be better.

[1]  A. Flood,et al.  Does Practice Make Perfect?: Part II: The Relation Between Volume and and Outcomes and Other Hospital Characteristics , 1984, Medical care.

[2]  E. Yano,et al.  The Condition of the Literature on Differences in Hospital Mortality , 1989, Medical care.

[3]  A. Flood,et al.  Does Practice Make Perfect?: Part I: The Relation Between Hospital Volume and Outcomes for Selected Diagnostic Categories , 1984, Medical care.

[4]  W. Knaus,et al.  An evaluation of outcome from intensive care in major medical centers. , 1986, Annals of internal medicine.

[5]  U. Ruttimann,et al.  Accurate prediction of the outcome of pediatric intensive care. A new quantitative method. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  W. Knaus,et al.  The case for adjusting hospital death rates for severity of illness. , 1986, Health affairs.

[7]  D. Berwick,et al.  Hospital leaders' opinions of the HCFA mortality data. , 1990, JAMA.

[8]  K. Lohr,et al.  Differences among hospitals in Medicare patient mortality. , 1989, Health services research.

[9]  Edward L. Hannan,et al.  Investigation of the Relationship Between Volume and Mortality for Surgical Procedures Performed in New York State Hospitals , 1989 .

[10]  J. Lubitz,et al.  Outcomes of surgery among the Medicare aged: Surgical volume and mortality , 1985, Health care financing review.

[11]  D Draper,et al.  Interpreting hospital mortality data. The role of clinical risk adjustment. , 1988, JAMA.

[12]  R. Elashoff,et al.  Flaws in mortality data. The hazards of ignoring comorbid disease. , 1988, JAMA.

[13]  Ann Barry Flood,et al.  Hospital structure and performance , 1987 .

[14]  K. Kahn,et al.  Medical Record Abstraction Form and Guidelines for Assessing Quality of Care for Hospitalized Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1988 .

[15]  K. Kahn,et al.  Medical Record Abstraction Form and Guidelines for Assessing Quality of Care for Hospitalized Patients with Congestive Heart Failure , 1988 .

[16]  P Sharkey,et al.  The importance of severity of illness in assessing hospital mortality. , 1990, JAMA.

[17]  Blumberg Ms Comments on HCFA hospital death rate statistical outliers. Health Care Financing Administration. , 1987 .

[18]  Robert H. Brook,et al.  Hospital Inpatient Mortality , 1987 .