Effects of a saliva test pipeline procedure on adolescent self-reported alcohol use.

Self-reports on alcohol use collected via school-based questionnaires, telephone surveys, and household interviews are central measures in many studies in the alcohol field. The validity of such self-reports remains an issue. Use of biological pipeline procedures is one way in which the quality of self-reports might be improved. The current study tested the effectiveness of a saliva test pipeline procedure in increasing drinking disclosure rates among adolescents in the sixth and eighth grades. Two sixth-grade classes from each of 14 elementary schools (n = 828) and four eighth-grade classes from each of 8 middle schools (n = 754) were selected. Half of the classes in each school were assigned to the pipeline condition and half to the control condition. Each student in the pipeline condition was asked to provide a saliva sample via dental roll before completing a questionnaire that all students (pipeline and control) received. Pipeline students were told that "some of the saliva we collect today will be tested in a laboratory and will provide a biological measure of alcohol use." Sixth- and eighth-grade students exposed to the alcohol procedure reported 5 to 7% higher alcohol use prevalences than students in the control group. While the pattern of improved reporting under the pipeline condition held across four alcohol-use measures and two grade levels, the effect was statistically significant for only one measure. The pipeline procedures used here had small effects on adolescent self-reported alcohol use.

[1]  David M. Zucker,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Pitfall: The Fixed Effects Analysis in a Nested Design , 1990 .

[2]  P. Remington,et al.  A comparison of alcohol sales data with survey data on self-reported alcohol use in 21 states. , 1990, American journal of public health.

[3]  C. Werch,et al.  Bogus-pipeline effects on self-reported college student drug use, problems, and attitudes. , 1989, The International journal of the addictions.

[4]  I. Newman,et al.  Assessing the Validity of Self-Reported Adolescent Cigarette Smoking , 1988, Journal of drug education.

[5]  G A Marlatt,et al.  Verbal report methods in clinical research on alcoholism: response bias and its minimization. , 1987, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[6]  P. J. Marty,et al.  Effects of the bogus-pipeline on enhancing validity of self-reported adolescent drug use measures. , 1987, The Journal of school health.

[7]  B. Zuckerman,et al.  Maternal marijuana use and neonatal outcome: uncertainty posed by self-reports. , 1986, American journal of public health.

[8]  R. Windsor,et al.  Use of a bogus pipeline method to increase accuracy of self-reported alcohol consumption among pregnant women. , 1986, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[9]  C. Malotte,et al.  The bogus pipeline revisited: the use of the threat of detection as a means of increasing self-reports of tobacco use. , 1985, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  J. Graham,et al.  Agreement Between Retrospective Accounts of Substance Use and Earlier Reported Substance Use , 1985 .

[11]  J. Allegrante,et al.  Adolescents' Self-Reports of Tobacco, Alcohol, and Marijuana use: Examining the Comparability of Video Tape, Cartoon and Verbal Bogus-Pipeline Procedures , 1984, Psychological reports.

[12]  P. Gillies,et al.  Do we need objective measures to validate self-reported smoking? , 1984, Public health.

[13]  R. Akers,et al.  Are self-reports of adolescent deviance valid? Biochemical measures, randomized response, and the bogus pipeline in smoking behavior. , 1983 .

[14]  L. Johnston,et al.  Reliability and consistency in self-reports of drug use. , 1983, The International journal of the addictions.

[15]  L. Roos.  Supply, workload and utilization: a population-based analysis of surgery in rural Manitoba. , 1983, American journal of public health.

[16]  E. Church.  On the usefulness and ethics of chemical testing of children. , 1983, American journal of public health.

[17]  L. Midanik.  The validity of self-reported alcohol consumption and alcohol problems: a literature review. , 1982, British journal of addiction.

[18]  Karl E. Bauman,et al.  Influence of an objective measure on self-reports of behavior. , 1982, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  D. Reid,et al.  Use of objective measurement in the validation of self-reported smoking in children aged 10 and 11 years: saliva thiocyanate. , 1982, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[20]  R. Akers,et al.  Evaluation of cigarette smoking among adolescents: the Muscatine study. , 1982, Preventive medicine.

[21]  Patrick M. O'Malley,et al.  When Four Months Equal a Year: Inconsistencies in Student Reports of Drug Use , 1981 .

[22]  D. Jacobs,et al.  Saliva thiocyanate: a chemical indicator of cigarette smoking in adolescents. , 1981, American journal of public health.

[23]  M. Mittelmark,et al.  Increasing the validity of self-reports of behavior in a smoking in children investigation. , 1977 .

[24]  Bruce D. Johnson,et al.  The Reliability and Validity of Drug Use Responses in a Large Scale Longitudinal Survey , 1975 .

[25]  Harold Sigall,et al.  The bogus pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude. , 1971 .

[26]  C. Perry,et al.  The measurement of substance use among adolescents: when is the 'bogus pipeline' method needed? , 1987, Addictive behaviors.

[27]  C. Perry,et al.  The validity of smoking self-reports by adolescents: a reexamination of the bogus pipeline procedure. , 1987, Addictive behaviors.

[28]  W. B. Hansen.  Behavioral predictors of abstinence: early indicators of a dependence on tobacco among adolescents. , 1983, The International journal of the addictions.

[29]  G. Koch,et al.  Validity of self-reports of adolescent cigarette smoking. , 1982, The International journal of the addictions.

[30]  R. Smart,et al.  Validity and Reliahility of Self-Reported Drug Use , 1972 .