Factors Influencing Collaborative Activities between Non-Professional Disaster Volunteers and Victims of Earthquake Disasters

Background Assistance from non-professional disaster volunteers (hereinafter, volunteers) is essential for disaster victims to recover physically and rebuild their lives; however, disaster victims in some areas are reluctant to accept assistance from volunteers. This study explored factors that may influence collaborative activities between volunteers and victims of earthquake disasters. Methods From July to September 2008, a self-reporting questionnaire survey was conducted with all 302 leaders of neighborhood associations in a city within Niigata Prefecture at the time of the Niigataken Chuetsu-oki Earthquake in 2007. Each factor was determined based on the Health Belief Model. Multiple regression analysis was conducted, using collaborative activities as the objective variable. Results From 261 valid responses received (response rate 86.4%), 41.3% of leaders collaborated with volunteers, and 60.2% of associations had residents who collaborated with volunteers. Collaboration with volunteers was significantly and positively related to perceived severity of an earthquake disaster (standardized partial regression coefficient β = 0.224, p<0.001) and neighborhood association activities during the earthquake disaster (β = 0.539, p<0.001). A positive and marginally significant relation was found between such collaboration and sense of coherence within a community (β = 0.137, p = 0.06), social capital (β = 0.119, p = 0.08), and perceived benefits (β = 0.116, p = 0.09). Conclusion Collaboration between disaster victims and volunteers during the response to an earthquake may require the preemptive estimation of damage by residents during normal times and the enhancement of neighborhood association activities during a disaster. For residents to have such estimation abilities, public institutions should provide information related to anticipated disaster damage and appropriate disaster prevention training and education. In addition, residents should create a disaster prevention map with other residents. Lastly, promoting neighborhood association activities may require the participation of many residents in disaster drills and education as well as a preemptive discussion of neighborhood activities during a disaster.

[1]  Julian Baggini,et al.  SOCIAL animal. , 1953, Lancet.

[2]  J. Kirscht,et al.  A new approach to explaining sick-role behavior in low-income populations. , 1974, American journal of public health.

[3]  A. Antonovsky Unraveling the mystery of health: how people manage stress and stay well , 1987 .

[4]  Neil R. Britton,et al.  Permanent Disaster Volunteers: Where Do They Fit? , 1991 .

[5]  K. Glanz,et al.  Health behavior and health education : theory, research, and practice , 1991 .

[6]  R. Putnam,et al.  Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. , 1994 .

[7]  S. Osborne,et al.  The voluntary and non-profit sector in Japan: current trends and an agenda for the future , 2003 .

[8]  R. Croyle,et al.  Theory at a glance: a guide for health promotion practice (Second edition). , 2005 .

[9]  池田 三郎,et al.  A better integrated management of disaster risks : toward resilient society to emerging disaster risks in mega-cities , 2006 .

[10]  Angela L. Bies,et al.  The Role of Nonprofits in Disaster Response: An Expanded Model of Cross-Sector Collaboration , 2007 .

[11]  Isamu Suzuki Roles of Volunteers in Disaster Prevention : Implications of questionnaire and interview surveys , 2007 .

[12]  Y. Yamazaki,et al.  Development of a short version of the sense of coherence scale for population survey , 2007, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[13]  Keiko Hirata,et al.  Japan's Dual Civil Society: Members Without Advocates , 2008, Perspectives on Politics.

[14]  R. Mancoske Asset Building and Community Development (2nd ed.), by Green, G. P., & Haines, A. , 2011 .