Conformance Analysis of the Execution of Clinical Guidelines with Basic Medical Knowledge and Clinical Terminology

Clinical Guidelines (CGs) are developed for specifying the “best” clinical procedures for specific clinical circumstances. However, a CG is executed on a specific patient, with her peculiarities, and in a specific context, with its limitations and constraints. Physicians have to use Basic Medical Knowledge (BMK) in order to adapt the general CG to each specific case, even if the interplay between CGs and the BMK can be very complex, and the BMK should rely on medical terminological knowledge. In this paper, we focus on a posteriori analysis of conformance, intended as the adherence of an observed execution trace to CG and BMK knowledge. A CG description in the GLARE language is mapped to Answer Set Programming (ASP); the BMK and conformance rules are also represented in ASP. The BMK relies on the SNOMED CT terminology and additional (post-coordinated) concepts. Conformance analysis is performed in Answer Set Programming and identifies non-adherence situations to the CG and/or BMK, pointing out, in particular, discrepancies from one knowledge source that could be justified by another source, and discrepancies that cannot be justified.

[1]  Erhard Rahm,et al.  AGENTWORK: a workflow system supporting rule-based workflow adaptation , 2004, Data Knowl. Eng..

[2]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Conformance checking of processes based on monitoring real behavior , 2008, Inf. Syst..

[3]  Marius Thomas Lindauer,et al.  Potassco: The Potsdam Answer Set Solving Collection , 2011, AI Commun..

[4]  Franz Baader,et al.  Pushing the EL Envelope , 2005, IJCAI.

[5]  Stefan Woltran,et al.  Special issue on answer set programming , 2011, AI Commun..

[6]  Paolo Terenziani,et al.  An ontological knowledge and multiple abstraction level decision support system in healthcare , 2014, Decis. Anal..

[7]  Hans Tompits,et al.  Combining answer set programming with description logics for the Semantic Web , 2004, Artif. Intell..

[8]  Paolo Terenziani,et al.  A modular approach for representing and executing clinical guidelines , 2001, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[9]  Boudewijn F. van Dongen,et al.  Towards Robust Conformance Checking , 2010, Business Process Management Workshops.

[10]  M A Kish,et al.  Guide to development of practice guidelines. , 2001, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[11]  Paola Mello,et al.  Conformance Checking of Executed Clinical Guidelines in Presence of Basic Medical Knowledge , 2011, Business Process Management Workshops.

[12]  M. Field,et al.  Guidelines for Clinical Practice: From Development to Use , 1992 .

[13]  Jorge Munoz-Gama,et al.  Enhancing precision in Process Conformance: Stability, confidence and severity , 2011, 2011 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM).

[14]  Laura Giordano,et al.  Adopting model checking techniques for clinical guidelines verification , 2010, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[15]  Betsy van Dijk,et al.  Medintel: Decision Support for General Practitioners: A Case Study , 2009, MIE.

[16]  Laura Giordano,et al.  Business process verification with constraint temporal answer set programming* , 2013, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming.

[17]  Silvana Quaglini,et al.  Compliance with Clinical Practice Guidelines , 2008, Computer-based Medical Guidelines and Protocols.

[18]  Peter J. F. Lucas Computer-based Medical Guidelines and Protocols: A Primer and Current Trends , 2008 .

[19]  Nicolette de Keizer,et al.  A survey of SNOMED CT implementations , 2012, Journal of Biomedical Informatics.

[20]  Alan L. Rector,et al.  MEDICAL INFORMATICS , 1990, The Lancet.

[21]  Markus Krötzsch,et al.  ELK Reasoner: Architecture and Evaluation , 2012, ORE.