论文信息 - Assessing the effectiveness of expert teams

Assessing the effectiveness of expert teams

The earliest literature concerning collective judgment consistently indicated that groupings of experts should be expected to outperform their average member, but there is little evidence available to suggest that the quality of collective judgment is substantially improved by any particular method of aggregation (Rohrbaugh, 1979, 1981). Fischer (1981) has concluded: From a practical standpoint it makes little or no difference how one aggregates the conflicting opinions of experts. Any reasonable approach is likely to be as good as any other.

John Rohrbaugh | J. Rohrbaugh

[1] Stuart L. Hart,et al. Toward quality criteria for collective judgments , 1985 .

[2] J. Rohrbaugh,et al. A Competing Values Approach to Organizational Effectiveness , 1981 .

[3] E. Boring,et al. The nature and history of experimental control. , 1954, The American journal of psychology.

[4] John Rohrbaugh,et al. Improving the quality of group judgment: Social judgment analysis and the Delphi technique. , 1979 .

[5] Peter Tryfos,et al. The Profitability of Wagering on NFL Games , 1984 .

[6] Robert K. Merton,et al. Sociology Today: Problems and Prospects , 1962 .

[7] John Rohrbaugh,et al. A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Towards a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis , 1983 .

[8] G. W. Fischer. When oracles fail—A comparison of four procedures for aggregating subjective probability forecasts , 1981 .

[9] John Rohrbaugh,et al. Improving the quality of group judgment: Social judgment analysis and the nominal group technique , 1981 .

[10] A. Lewin,et al. Determining organizational effectiveness: another look, and an agenda for research , 1986 .

[11] Dan Zakay,et al. The evaluation of managerial decisions' quality by managers , 1984 .

[12] M. Wittrock. Handbook of research on teaching , 1986 .