Press-fit condylar design total knee arthroplasty. Fourteen to seventeen-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND The Press-Fit Condylar total knee arthroplasty implant design has been used by many orthopaedic surgeons over the last twenty years. The design has survived with relatively minor modifications and remains a popular implant system today. The present study represents the fourteen to seventeen-year results for our patients who were described in our previous report on the eight to ten-year results. METHODS The senior author performed 160 consecutive total knee arthroplasties with use of the Press-Fit Condylar cruciate-retaining device in 134 patients between 1986 and 1989. The mean age of the patients at the time of the index procedure was 70.5 years. Follow-up data were available for sixty-three of sixty-four surviving knees. Surviving patients were followed for a mean of 15.8 years. The knees were evaluated on the basis of Knee Society function and clinical scores, radiographs, and survivorship analysis. RESULTS The mean Knee Society function score was 65, and the mean clinical score was 89. The overall survival rate of the knee was 91.5% with revision for any reason as the end point and 97.2% with aseptic loosening as the end point. The rate of revision of the tibial insert because of wear-related aseptic loosening was 2.5%. We found no relationship between revision and the shelf life or method of sterilization of the polyethylene insert. Radiolucent lines were present in 62% (twenty-one) of thirty-four knees; all radiolucent lines were nonprogressive. None of the implants were loose according to the criteria of the Knee Society. CONCLUSIONS This long-term analysis indicates that the Press-Fit Condylar total knee implant is a successful implant system with excellent longevity.

[1]  S. Kelley,et al.  Results of knee arthroplasty using the cemented press-fit condylar prosthesis. Based on a preliminary report. , 1995, American journal of orthopedics.

[2]  F. C. Ewald The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  P. J. Gregg,et al.  A randomised, controlled trial of cemented versus cementless press-fit condylar total knee replacement , 2002 .

[4]  M. Pagnano,et al.  Total Knee Arthroplasty for Patients 90 Years of Age and Older , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  P J Gregg,et al.  A randomised controlled trial of cemented versus cementless press-fit condylar total knee replacement: 15-year survival analysis. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  G. Engh,et al.  Failure of the polyethylene bearing surface of a total knee replacement within four years. A case report. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  M. Stuart,et al.  Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients 55 Years Old or Younger: 10- to 17-Year Results , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  A. Hofmann,et al.  Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients 50 Years or Younger , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  C. G. Moran,et al.  Kinematic condylar total knee arthroplasty , 1996 .

[10]  M. Archibeck,et al.  What's new in adult reconstructive knee surgery. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  Chun‐Hsiung Huang,et al.  Long-term results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  Andrew McCaskie,et al.  Randomised, prospective study comparing cemented and cementless total knee replacement - Results of press-fit condylar total knee replacement at five years , 1998 .

[13]  D W Murray,et al.  Survival analysis of joint replacements. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  T. Thornhill,et al.  Total knee arthroplasty with the PFC system , 1998 .

[15]  Kenneth A. Egol,et al.  Controversies in Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures , 2003 .

[16]  José A. Rodriguez,et al.  The Press-Fit Condylar Modular Total Knee System. Four-to-Six-Year Results with a Posterior-Cruciate-Substituting Design* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  I. Pinder,et al.  Kinematic condylar total knee arthroplasty. 14-year survivorship analysis of 208 consecutive cases. , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[18]  O. Mahoney,et al.  Loosening and Osteolysis with the Press-Fit Condylar Posterior-Cruciate-Substituting Total Knee Replacement , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  C. Ranawat,et al.  Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty. A 15-year survivorship study. , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  L. Dorr,et al.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  C. Colwell,et al.  The press-fit condylar total knee system: 8- to 10-year results with a posterior cruciate-retaining design. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[22]  D. W. Roberts,et al.  Factors Influencing Wear and Osteolysis in Press-Fit Condylar Modular Total Knee Replacements , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  R. Scott,et al.  Twelve years' experience with posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  R. Scott,et al.  Failure of the metal-backed patellar component after total knee replacement. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  P. Gregg,et al.  Survival analysis of cemented Press-Fit Condylar total knee arthroplasty. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[26]  T. Thornhill,et al.  The fate of patients not returning for follow-up five years after total knee arthroplasty. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[27]  A. Lombardi,et al.  Fracture/dissociation of the polyethylene in metal-backed patellar components in total knee arthroplasty. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  G. Gill,et al.  Knee arthroplasty in octogenarians: results at 10 years. , 2003, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[29]  J. Insall,et al.  The total condylar prosthesis. 10- to 12-year results of a cemented knee replacement. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[30]  M. Ritter,et al.  Long-term deterioration of joint evaluation scores. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[31]  Rosalind J Wright,et al.  Two- to four-year results of posterior cruciate-sparing condylar total knee arthroplasty with an uncemented femoral component. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[32]  T. Thornhill,et al.  Press-fit condylar total knee arthroplasty. 5- to 9-year follow-up evaluation. , 1997, Journal of Arthroplasty.