Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Retrieving Qualitative Studies in PsycINFO

Researchers and practitioners have problems retrieving qualitative studies. Search strategies that can easily and effectively retrieve these studies from large databases such as PsycINFO are therefore important. To determine if search strategies can identify qualitative studies, 64 journals published in 2000 were hand searched using explicit methodological criteria to identify qualitative studies. The authors tested multiple search strategies using 4,985 potential search terms in PsycINFO (Ovid Technologies) and compared the results with the hand search data to calculate retrieval effectiveness. A total of 125 qualitative studies were identified. Single-term and multiple-term strategies had sensitivities (maximizing retrieval of qualitative studies) up to 94.4% and specificities (minimizing retrieval of nonqualitative studies and reports) up to 98.6% with ranges of precision and accuracy. Search strategies included terms that were variations of interview, qualitative, themes, and experience. Formal indexing terms performed poorly. Empirically derived search strategies combining textwords can effectively, but not perfectly, retrieve qualitative studies from PsycINFO.

[1]  David Evans,et al.  Database searches for qualitative research. , 2002, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[2]  R. Brian Haynes,et al.  Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound studies in MEDLINE. , 1994, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[3]  N L Wilczynski,et al.  Assessment of methodologic search filters in MEDLINE. , 1993, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[4]  Karen A Robinson,et al.  Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed. , 2002, International journal of epidemiology.

[5]  B. Hanna,et al.  The early detection of postpartum depression: midwives and nurses trial a checklist. , 2004, Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN.

[6]  K. Shojania,et al.  Taking advantage of the explosion of systematic reviews: an efficient MEDLINE search strategy. , 2001, Effective clinical practice : ECP.

[7]  Margarete Sandelowski,et al.  The Challenges of Searching for and Retrieving Qualitative Studies , 2003, Western journal of nursing research.

[8]  R Brian Haynes,et al.  EMBASE search strategies for identifying methodologically sound diagnostic studies for use by clinicians and researchers , 2005, BMC medicine.

[9]  H B Dumbrigue,et al.  Assessment of MEDLINE search strategies for randomized controlled trials in prosthodontics. , 2000, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[10]  R Brian Haynes,et al.  BMC Medicine BioMed Central , 2003 .

[11]  Khalid S. Khan,et al.  A Two‐Term MEDLINE Search Strategy for Identifying Randomized Trials in Obstetrics and Gynecology , 1998, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  Leslie A. Walters,et al.  Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Retrieving Clinically Relevant Qualitative Studies in EMBASE , 2006, Qualitative health research.

[13]  R. Haynes,et al.  Medline : analytical survey scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from Optimal search strategies for retrieving , 2004 .

[14]  A R Jadad,et al.  A high-yield strategy to identify randomized controlled trials for systematic reviews. , 1993, The Online journal of current clinical trials.

[15]  Jadad Ar,et al.  A high-yield strategy to identify randomized controlled trials for systematic reviews. , 1993 .

[16]  R. Brian Haynes,et al.  Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Sound Clinical Prediction Studies in MEDLINE , 2003, AMIA.

[17]  R. Brian Haynes,et al.  Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Causation Studies in MEDLINE , 2003, AMIA.

[18]  C. Adams,et al.  An investigation of the adequacy of MEDLINE searches for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the effects of mental health care , 1994, Psychological Medicine.

[19]  K. Ann McKibbon,et al.  A quantitative analysis of qualitative studies in clinical journals for the 2000 publishing year , 2004, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[20]  R. Haynes,et al.  Search Strategies for Identifying Qualitative Studies in CINAHL , 2007, Qualitative health research.

[21]  R. Brian Haynes,et al.  Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Relevant Qualitative Studies in MEDLINE , 2004, MedInfo.

[22]  K. A. McKibbon,et al.  Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of treatment from Medline: analytical survey , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[23]  K. A. McKibbon,et al.  What do evidence-based secondary journals tell us about the publication of clinically important articles in primary healthcare journals? , 2004, BMC medicine.

[24]  R. Brian Haynes,et al.  Enhancing Retrieval of Best Evidence for Health Care from Bibliographic Databases: Calibration of the Hand Search of the Literature , 2001, MedInfo.

[25]  A. Marson,et al.  How Easy are Randomized Controlled Trials in Epilepsy to Find on Medline? The Sensitivity and Precision of Two Medline Searches , 1996, Epilepsia.

[26]  D. Pravikoff,et al.  Readiness of U.S. Nurses for Evidence-Based Practice: Many don’t understand or value research and have had little or no training to help them find evidence on which to base their practice. , 2005, The American journal of nursing.

[27]  J. Fielden Grief as a transformative experience: weaving through different lifeworlds after a loved one has completed suicide. , 2003, International journal of mental health nursing.

[28]  M. Ebell,et al.  Obstacles to answering doctors' questions about patient care with evidence: qualitative study , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  Tina Miller,et al.  Finding qualitative research: an evaluation of search strategies , 2004, BMC medical research methodology.

[30]  Mark A. Spasser,et al.  Development and evaluation of evidence-based nursing (EBN) filters and related databases. , 2005, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[31]  Johanna I. Westbrook,et al.  Research Paper: Do clinicians use online evidence to support patient care? a study of 55, 000 clinicians , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..