A scale-independent, site conservation planning framework in The Nature Conservancy

Abstract Site conservation planning in The Nature Conservancy is a scale-independent process that defines the landscape within which conservation targets (i.e., species and communities of concern) can persist. The process integrates more traditional preserve design and land acquisition activities with newer conservation biology and ecosystem management concepts into a single dynamic framework. Site conservation planning can be thought of as a series of questions, which if answered would constitute the major components of a plan. These questions are: (1) What are the significant conservation targets and long-term goals for those targets? (2) What biotic and abiotic attributes maintain those targets over the long term? (3) What are the basic characteristics of the human communities at the site? (4) What current and potential activities interfere with the survival of conservation targets and maintenance of ecological processes that sustain them? (5) Who are the organized groups and influential individuals at the site (i.e., stakeholders), what impacts will the goals have on them, and how might they help or hinder us in achieving those goals? (6) What can we do to prevent or mitigate threatening activities, and how can we influence important stakeholders? (7) What are the areas on the ground where we need to act? (8) What kinds of actions are necessary to accomplish our goals, who will do them, how long will they take, and how much will they cost? (9) Can we succeed in our goals, based on assessment of both ecological and human concerns and programmatic resources? (10) How will we know if we are making progress toward our goals and if our actions are bringing about desired results? Site conservation planning is best accomplished with an interdisciplinary team consisting of scientists, planners, and implementers. We recommend revisiting plans periodically to update and revise information, particularly threats to major ecological processes sustaining conservation targets and strategies that address those threats.

[1]  Sam H. Ham,et al.  A planning and decision-making framework for ecological restoration , 1995 .

[2]  Peggy L. Fiedler,et al.  Conservation biology : the theory and practice of nature conservation, preservation, and management , 1992 .

[3]  B. Walker.  Biodiversity and Ecological Redundancy , 1992 .

[4]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Ecological Dynamics at Broad ScalesEcosystems and landscapes , 1995 .

[5]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  Refuge Design and Island Biogeographic Theory: Effects of Fragmentation , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[6]  Paul Rookwood,et al.  Landscape planning for biodiversity , 1995 .

[7]  Lawrence W. Barnthouse,et al.  Ecology, Impact Assessment, and Environmental Planning , 1986 .

[8]  Kathryn A. Kohm.  Balancing on the brink of extinction : the Endangered Species Act and lessons for the future , 1991 .

[9]  Robert V. O'Neill,et al.  Relating Patterns of Land‐Use Change to Faunal Biodiversity in the Central Amazon , 1994 .

[10]  Dennis D. Murphy,et al.  Providing a Regional Context for Local Conservation ActionA natural community conservation plan for the southern California coastal sage scrub , 1995 .

[11]  R. Noss.  Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical Approach , 1990 .

[12]  E. Ranta,et al.  On Island biogeography and conservation. Reply , 1986 .

[13]  J. H. Giliomee.  Ecological planning: Method and evaluation , 1977 .

[14]  R. G. Wright,et al.  GAP ANALYSIS: A GEOGRAPHIC APPROACH TO PROTECTION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY , 1993 .

[15]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology , 1992 .

[16]  Reed F. Noss,et al.  From plant communities to landscapes in conservation inventories: A look at the nature conservancy (USA) , 1987 .

[17]  Barbara L. Marks,et al.  An Approach for Managing Vertebrate Diversity Across Multiple-Use Landscapes. , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[18]  Céline Boutin,et al.  A functional classification of wetland plants , 1993 .

[19]  C. Barrows.  An Ecological Model for the Protection of a Dune Ecosystem , 1996 .

[20]  Claude Amoros,et al.  Restoration ecology of riverine wetlands: I. A scientific base , 1995 .

[21]  M. Soulé,et al.  Land Use Planning and Wildlife Maintenance: Guidelines for Conserving Wildlife in an Urban Landscape , 1991 .

[22]  R. E. Grumbine.  What Is Ecosystem Management , 1994 .

[23]  William H. van der Schalie,et al.  A framework for ecological risk assessment at the EPA , 1992 .

[24]  A. G. Valk,et al.  Succession in Wetlands: A Gleasonian Appraoch , 1981 .

[25]  M. Brunson.  Integrating "Human Habitat" Requirements into Ecosystem Management Strategies: A Case Study , 1996 .

[26]  V. T. Parker,et al.  The New Paradigm in Ecology: Implications for Conservation Biology Above the Species Level , 1992 .

[27]  J. Marusic.  Conservation planning within a framework of landscape planning in Slovenia , 1993 .

[28]  James H. Brown,et al.  The Report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management , 1996 .

[29]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  Ecological Properties for the Evaluation, Management, and Restoration of Temperate Deciduous Forest Ecosystems , 1996 .

[30]  Carl Steinitz,et al.  A Framework for Theory Applicable to the Education of Landscape Architects (and Other Environmental Design Professionals) , 1990, Landscape Journal.