Sensory factors limiting horizontal and vertical visual span for letter recognition.

Reading speed for English text is slower for text oriented vertically than horizontally. Yu, Park, Gerold, and Legge (2010) showed that slower reading of vertical text is associated with a smaller visual span (the number of letters recognized with high accuracy without moving the eyes). Three possible sensory determinants of the size of the visual span are: resolution (decreasing acuity at letter positions farther from the midline), mislocations (uncertainty about the relative position of letters in strings), and crowding (interference from flanking letters in recognizing the target letter). In the present study, we asked which of these factors is most important in determining the size of the visual span, and likely in turn in determining the horizontal/vertical difference in reading when letter size is above the critical print size for reading. We used a decomposition analysis to represent constraints due to resolution, mislocations, and crowding as losses in information transmitted (in bits) about letter recognition. Across vertical and horizontal conditions, crowding accounted for 75% of the loss in information, mislocations accounted for 19% of the loss, and declining acuity away from fixation accounted for only 6%. We conclude that crowding is the major factor limiting the size of the visual span, and that the horizontal/vertical difference in the size of the visual span is associated with stronger crowding along the vertical midline.

[1]  Endel Põder,et al.  Crowding, feature integration, and two kinds of "attention". , 2006, Journal of vision.

[2]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of Reading in Normal and Low Vision , 2006 .

[3]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[4]  H. Bedell,et al.  Contrast Sensitivity for Letter and Grating Targets under Various Stimulus Conditions , 1989, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[5]  H. BOUMA,et al.  Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition , 1970, Nature.

[6]  S. Klein,et al.  Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in peripheral vision: peripheral crowding is neither size invariant nor simple contrast masking. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[7]  David C Burr,et al.  Long-term effects of monocular deprivation revealed with binocular rivalry gratings modulated in luminance and in color. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[8]  S M Anstis,et al.  Letter: A chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position. , 1974, Vision research.

[9]  G. Legge,et al.  Mr. Chips: an ideal-observer model of reading. , 1997, Psychological review.

[10]  G. Legge,et al.  Mr. Chips 2002: new insights from an ideal-observer model of reading , 2002, Vision Research.

[11]  Gordon E Legge,et al.  Preneural limitations on letter identification in central and peripheral vision. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[12]  J. Norman,et al.  Why is word recognition impaired by disorientation while the identification of single letters is not? , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  D. J. Brown,et al.  Peripheral visual acuity. , 1966, Archives of ophthalmology.

[14]  Tracey D. Berger,et al.  Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[15]  H. Bouma Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. , 1973, Vision research.

[16]  D Whitaker,et al.  Relative roles of resolution and spatial interference in foveal and peripheral vision. , 1996, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[17]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness , 1996, Nature.

[18]  J. Norman,et al.  Reading rotated words. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Crowding in Peripheral Vision: Why Bigger Is Better , 2009, Current Biology.

[20]  D. Levi Crowding—An essential bottleneck for object recognition: A mini-review , 2008, Vision Research.

[21]  A Koriat,et al.  What is rotated in mental rotation? , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  Lei Liu,et al.  Whole report uncovers correctly identified but incorrectly placed target information under visual crowding. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[23]  D. Levi,et al.  The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea , 1992, Vision Research.

[24]  Sing-Hang Cheung,et al.  Effect of letter spacing on visual span and reading speed. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[25]  Barry B. Lee,et al.  Temporal frequency and chromatic processing in humans: an fMRI study of the cortical visual areas. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[26]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Precision of position signals for letters , 2009, Vision Research.

[27]  M C FLOM,et al.  VISUAL RESOLUTION AND CONTOUR INTERACTION. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[28]  Gordon E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision , 2001, Vision Research.

[29]  G. Legge,et al.  Comparing reading speed for horizontal and vertical English text. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[30]  I. Rentschler,et al.  Peripheral vision and pattern recognition: a review. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[31]  Daniel R. Coates,et al.  Factors Affecting Crowded Acuity: Eccentricity and Contrast , 2013, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[32]  Deyue Yu,et al.  Sensory and cognitive influences on the training-related improvement of reading speed in peripheral vision. , 2013, Journal of Vision.

[33]  D. Pelli,et al.  Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: distinguishing feature integration from detection. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[34]  Journal of the Optical Society of America , 1950, Nature.

[35]  T Wertheim,et al.  Peripheral visual acuity: Th. Wertheim. , 1980, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[36]  D. Levi,et al.  Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  Hongjing Lu,et al.  Two forms of aftereffects induced by transparent motion reveal multilevel adaptation. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[38]  Hans Strasburger,et al.  Source confusion is a major cause of crowding. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[39]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[40]  Sing-Hang Cheung,et al.  The case for the visual span as a sensory bottleneck in reading. , 2007, Journal of vision.